dark light

  • Austin

SCORPENE SSK [ Technical Merits & Demerits ]

No Flames Please , Pure Technical Merits & Discussion , Comparisons with contemprories would be fine 🙂

[COLOR=Red]Scorpene Once More[/COLOR]
FORCE September-2005 [http://www.forceindia.net]

By Prasun K. Sengupta

The Indian Navy’s longstanding plans to acquire a fleet of an initial six Scorpene diesel-electric submarines (SSK) worth Euros2.2 billion is now undergoing a makeover, both technically and financially, in order to realise their projected delivery schedules in the 2009-2015 period. The ministry of defence (MoD) is now reworking the offer first made in mid-2002 by Armaris (formerly DCN International) of France under which the first two SSKs will be built in Armaris’ Cherbourg-based shipyard and delivered by 2009, while the remaining four vessels will be licence-built by

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/scorpene/images/scorpene1.jpg
Scorpene SSK

Of the first six Scorpene SSKs, the first three vessels will be the CM-2000 variant and will have a conventional diesel-electric 12 PA4 V 200 SMDS propulsion system built by S.E.M.T. Pielstick, while the last three, known as the AM-2000 variant, will incorporate the diesel-engines as well as the MESMA (Module d’Energie Sous-Marine Autonome) air-independent propulsion (AIP) system. If the MoD decides to exercise the option to acquire another four Scorpenes, these will be AM-2000s. The performance parameters of both variants will remain the same, except that the length of the AM-2000 model will increase to 70 metres and its submerged displacement will be 1,870 tonnes, against the 61.7 metres and the 1,565 tonnes of the CM-2000. Both SSK variants will have a crew complement of 31 (with a standard watch team of nine) and endurance of 50 days. The hull will be built with HLES-80 high-yield stress-specific steel, which will allow the SSK to reach diving depths of up to 300m (1,150ft) and achieve an average of 240 days at sea per year per submarine. The Indian Scorpenes will also feature a connection point for allowing a Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle (that the navy will procure from either the US or Sweden) to dock during collective crew rescue operations.

http://www.subnetitalia.it/newsscorpene.jpg
Scorpene CutAway

All six Scorpene SSKs will be equipped with Underwater Defence Systems’ SUBTICS (SUBmarine Tactical Integrated Combat Systems) combat management system (CMS), S-Cube integrated long-range sonar suite (comprising bow, cylindrical, conformal arrays, towed-arrays, flank/distributed arrays, and a high-resolution sonar for mine and obstacle avoidance) and CMO-10 non-hull-penetrating optronic mast (containing a thermal imager, high-definition colour TV sensor and wide-band RF sensors); Glasgow-based THALES Optronic Systems’ combined CKO-48/CHO-98 search-attack periscopes ; and Elbit Systems-built combined SATCOM/VLS communications system and an electronic warfare/direction-finding suite; all of which will be acquired off-the-shelf. The navy will also acquire a shore-based integrated simulation facility called SUBTRAC that will contain separate modules replicating the Scorpene’s tactical command-and-control station housing the CMS, integrated platform management system, communications suite, weapons loading/fire-control suite, EW Suite, and propulsion system. SUBTRAC will provide Combat System Operator or Team Training, plus Combat System or Submarine Tactical Training.

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/scorpene/images/scorpene3.jpg
SUBTICS
Scorpene sonar suite includes a long range passive cylindrical array, an intercept sonar, active sonar, distributed array, flank array, a high resolution sonar for mine and obstacle avoidance and a towed array.

The primary armaments package for each Indian Scorpene SSK will now comprise up to four MBDA-built Exocet MM-40 Block 3 subsonic anti-ship cruise missiles and up to 16 533mm heavyweight electric tor*pedoes that can be launched from the six bow-located 21-inch torpedo tubes. The MM-40 Block 3 will have a range in excess of 180km and be equipped with a jam-resistant J-band active radar seeker with adaptive search patterns, plus GPS-based targeting avionics for engaging both warships and land-based targets. The wire-guided heavyweight torpedoes now on offer include Whitehead Alenia Sistemi Subacqua’s (WASS) BlackShark/IF21 (already ordered by Pakistan and Malaysia for their Agosta 90B and Scorpene SSKs), A184 and F17 Mod 2 family of torpedoes; BAE Systems’ Spearfish Mod 1; Alliant TechSystems’ Mk48 ADCAP; Atlas Elektronik of Germany’s Sea Hake; and Bofors Underwater System’s Tp 2000.

http://www.defense-update.com/images/EXOCET-b3.gif
EXOCET AntiShip Missile

http://www.chez.com/sousmarin/rubis3.jpg
EXOCET SM-39 In Action

http://www.dcn.fr/us/offre/img/blackshark.jpg
Heavy Weight Black Shark Torpedo

http://www.chez.com/sousmarin/torpille_files/image004.jpg
Bofors Underwater System’s Tp 2000

The open-architecture SUBTICS CMS, (using TMS 320 C30 processors on a speed-ring network) dual redundant Ethernet databus, will include six multi-function consoles each equipped with two high-definition 19-inch colour AMLCD monitors. The S-Cube sonar suite will handle simultaneous surface/submerged target classification, identification and track management (among a set of 100 recorded tracks) using broadband, narrowband, demon and pulse (passive interception and ranging) processing channels. Mounted on the SSK’s pressure hull will be launchers for the WASS-built C303/S anti-torpedo countermeasures system.

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/scorpene/images/scorpene7.jpg
Open-Architecture SUBTICS CMS

The Scorpene’s MESMA AIP system has been designed to increase the SSK’s submerged endurance from three or four days to two or three weeks. Developed jointly by a consortium comprising Bertin, Armaris, Framatome-Thermodyn, Technicatome and Air Liquide of France and Izar, it will comprise a conventional steam turbine receiving high-pressure steam from a combustion chamber burning a gaseous mixture of ethanol and oxygen. Heat energy will be converted into electrical energy using a conventional Rankine cycle comprising a steam generator, turbo-alternators and a condenser.

http://www.denizaltici.com/images/DH3-Mesma%20AIP.JPG
MESMA AIP

After inking the contract with Armaris, India will become the Scorpene SSK’s third export customer. The Chilean Navy has already taken delivery of its two Scorpene CM-2000s, the ‘Carrera’ and ‘O Higgins’, while the Royal Malaysian Navy, which ordered two Scorpene CM-2000s on 5 June 2002 under a Euros1.04 billion contract, will receive the SSKs in 2008 and 2009. The Scorpene family of SSKs has been jointly developed by Armaris and Spanish shipbuilder Navantia (formerly Bazan, then Izar) of Spain.

From DCN Websites

SCORPENE

MESMA AIP

Heavy Weight Black Shark Torpedo

Submarine Air Defence

Courtesy : FORCE [http://www.forceindia.net]

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

545

Send private message

By: danrh - 9th December 2005 at 01:11

from JDW 30 Nov 2005

Spain orders DM2A4 heavyweight torpedoes
Richard Scott Jane’s Naval Consultant
London
Spain’s Ministry of Defence has placed an order with BAE Systems’ up-for-sale German subsidiary Atlas Elektronik for the supply of DM2A4 heavyweight torpedoes to equip the Spanish Navy’s four new S-80A submarines.
Originally developed for the German Navy’s new U-212A submarines, the DM2A4 is itself an evolution of the earlier DM2A3 weapon, featuring a high-energy electrical propulsion system, an upgraded guidance system (using fibre-optic rather than copper wire to provide for the weapon’s extended range) and improved navigation (replacing mechanical gyroscopes with strapdown fibre-optic gyros).
Other changes comprise a wake sensor – an upward-looking high-frequency sonar – and an electronics upgrade (notably the conversion of the analogue processing in the acoustic homing head to digital signal processing). Elsewhere, existing DM2A3 subsystems are retained, including the conformal acoustic sensor array.
Warshot battery technology for the DM2A4 is based on Friemann & Wolf zinc silver oxide technology. Atlas has adapted a modular battery concept that enables torpedoes to be configured with between one and four ‘energy packages’ depending on user requirements.
Spain, the second overseas customer for the DM2A4 after Turkey, originally signed a government-to-government agreement for the acquisition of the DM2A4 with Germany in November 2004 following a favourable technical evaluation.
According to Atlas Elektronik, Spanish industry “will be involved in the production of the torpedoes to a significant extent”.
The first S-80A submarine is scheduled to enter service in 2011, with further boats following at yearly intervals thereafter.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

209

Send private message

By: radar - 7th October 2005 at 19:17

Scorpene is the best non-nuclear sub out there

it’s interessting that some sources claim that. until now there is no scorpene with mesma. how do they compare it to u-212 or a-19 or other subs?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 7th October 2005 at 18:15

Yeah, Mazagon SY acquires the ability to make submarines 🙂

LOL. Even thailand pays all chickens for buying the fighter… why cant India.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,377

Send private message

By: Victor - 7th October 2005 at 17:57

Is there an economic offset for this deal ??? anybody.

Yeah, Mazagon SY acquires the ability to make submarines 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 7th October 2005 at 14:35

Is there an economic offset for this deal ??? anybody.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 7th October 2005 at 12:49

The outlook article says that the plan is to carry more lethal weapons including missiles after first two subs. It seems like a typo, should mean bigger missiles like Brahmos perhaps. It is possible that India may change the design of the sub after first two to put in AIP and bigger missiles like Storm Shadow/Brahmos.

The deal is for 6 with option for another 9. The first 6 also seem to be split into 2 and then 4. Seems like 2, 4, 9 which would make additional line less likely.

On the other hand it seems like Amur is being offered at US$150-200 per sub which means it is much easier to afford.

I think absorbing the scorp tech would be tall order. Sub tech is way more than the hull welding techniques.

Also I hope the second line of subs is of heavier variety like 2500-4000 tons which would give India a fall back in case, ATV is delayed

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 7th October 2005 at 11:59

AIP would be necessary when you go on a long patrol out in the Blue water or if u require longer submerged endurance , Typical for Navy who dosent aspire or have Nuclear subs,

India would definatly aspires and would have few N subs so AIP is not a very urgent requirement for her , India can take time and decide on the AIP which suits her well or for that matter if Scorpene requires AIP.

The contract says and has an option of fitting AIP from 3rd sub onwards enough time to deliberate about it.

India Definately will go for Amur as Russia has offered a variant which is capable of firing 8 VLS Brahmos

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

122

Send private message

By: Ravula - 7th October 2005 at 07:32

IMO, This Scorpene is a waste of purchase. I agree with SATAN regarding Amur. Scorpene purchase doesnt give any advantage except some money for the french. India should have chosen AMUR

Plan has always been to get two different lines of classic subs. Scorp and Amur. Now that HDW has been de-blacklisted, 214 may be in the running.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

646

Send private message

By: WisePanda - 7th October 2005 at 06:16

for a non-strategic coastal patrol sub, operating under the protection of a strong surface navy (vs potential enemies), why is AIP so important ?

indian ports and waters are under little threat from the two potential enemies.

-vs- a hypothetical fight with USN, we are going to lose badly, AIP or no AIP so that’d
be the least of my worries 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 7th October 2005 at 03:44

Scorpene is the best non-nuclear sub out there , Diving depth hardly matters to non nuclear subs , since they require power to sustain and make use of it.The contract clause is tow subs to be built at MDL and from 3rd sub onwards there is an option to opt for AIP system which i believe is the right approach.

MDL is starting its sun construction line after more than a decade , There is a steep learning curve to be met so its better to take one thing at a time and build upon it.

http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=73&id=327269

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

21

Send private message

By: hermes - 6th October 2005 at 18:58

deal finally through: though at what cost????????

saw on the telly that the sub deal was through the political stage and was for the engineers to complete…also heard the defence analyst raja menon say on the NDTV channel that the first 3 subs come without MESMA..with options for the rest.. 😡 ..so what is the need for the sub?could someone enlighten moi? :mad:mazagaon docks are made a fool of by the govt. again 😮
are the first 3 off the shelf?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

606

Send private message

By: Neptune - 5th October 2005 at 18:08

It seems that U212 (and hence possibly U214) is using a weapon called Barracuda… Supercavitation with an ingenious steering system and a speed of 360km/h (approx same as Shkval). Developed by Diehl and Atlas Elektronik. Although it should be said that no answers are officially given to the question whether U212 has this weapon.
Nonetheless U212 is a better submarine with the heavy new torpedo (and possibly this supercavitation weapon). I think they could negotiate to receive these weapons as India doesn’t directly pose a threat to Germany.
And also the offer with the Russian Klub incorporated sounds appealing, much better than the Scorpene.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 5th October 2005 at 18:03

My personal opinion is that the indian navy should have gone for the AMUR subs that Russia was offering with full transfer of technology. but keeping in mind, that these Scorpenes are going to be used primarily for coastal defense and facing off againt Pakistan’s AgostaB90s……the U-214 would have been a better choice. The diving depth alone is 400m against the scorpenes 300m.

IMO, This Scorpene is a waste of purchase. I agree with SATAN regarding Amur. Scorpene purchase doesnt give any advantage except some money for the french. India should have chosen AMUR

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3

Send private message

By: SATAN - 5th October 2005 at 17:15

My personal opinion is that the indian navy should have gone for the AMUR subs that Russia was offering with full transfer of technology. but keeping in mind, that these Scorpenes are going to be used primarily for coastal defense and facing off againt Pakistan’s AgostaB90s……the U-214 would have been a better choice. The diving depth alone is 400m against the scorpenes 300m.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

606

Send private message

By: Neptune - 5th October 2005 at 16:26

So, what exactly is the advantage of a stupid nuclear reactor when you don’t have the space to carry food or weapons for long range deployments? Nuclear propulsion is not economical, the only advantage are long-time deployments, that require much food and other stuff, and high power tech that can be installed, something this sub isn’t planned to have either, or at least nothing more consuming than the conventional version carries.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 4th October 2005 at 07:50

Well Scorpene has a great deal gained from French N-sub program , The French keeps on claiming that its a virtual Nuclear sub , Minus the Reactor , But It would require a small Nuke reactor to fit in , India still has to demonstrate this , Perhaps when ATV come out which by all indication is going to be very soon we will come to know about it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 3rd October 2005 at 14:03

Well, according to DCN, the good thing about Scorpene’s design is that it can be fitted with a small nuclear reactor. Amaris has been sharing some of the technology for the Triomphant SSBN with the IN.

Any links to prove this ? :confused:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3

Send private message

By: SATAN - 3rd October 2005 at 12:40

Well so far about the deal which has come to light is 6 to be built at Maz Docks , with an option for 9 more and India has the freedom to export it to third country if she feels so.

Nothing on N-reactor on Scorpene , Its just a thinking that a small reactor could be fitted in to it.

Well, according to DCN, the good thing about Scorpene’s design is that it can be fitted with a small nuclear reactor. Amaris has been sharing some of the technology for the Triomphant SSBN with the IN.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 3rd October 2005 at 10:05

Is 6 the final number of scorpenes? or more are likely to be built with nuclear reactors instead of AIP.
Reply With Quote

Well so far about the deal which has come to light is 6 to be built at Maz Docks , with an option for 9 more and India has the freedom to export it to third country if she feels so.

Nothing on N-reactor on Scorpene , Its just a thinking that a small reactor could be fitted in to it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3

Send private message

By: SATAN - 3rd October 2005 at 09:26

Is 6 the final number of scorpenes? or more are likely to be built with nuclear reactors instead of AIP.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply