dark light

Singapore Airlines

Hi….. I have flown from Mumbai to LAX 3 times in last 365 days through Singapore airlines.. flying in 777-300 from BOM->SIN then 747-400 SIN-NRT-LAX…

Experiencing the 747 AFTER a 777 is like a disaster.. can anyone tell me what better airline options I can have to avoid the claustrophobic experience of the 747 on this route.. or when are these 747’s gonna get out…

On shorter routes.. I have travelled only A320 from the airbus till date.. and that too with IA.. and it WAS noisy.. will never fly IA again.. have also flown with Jet on 737… and in US … 738 on AA..

What is the most comfortable from the Airbus stable comparable to the 777’s out there..

btw.. I fly only economy class…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 10th March 2005 at 02:48

Yes i have heard about how cramped normally all EK planes are in cattle class…. just thinking what they would do to the A380.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 10th March 2005 at 02:48

Yes i have heard about how cramped normally all EK planes are in cattle class…. just thinking what they would do to the A380.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 9th March 2005 at 22:21

The 777’s are better inside than the 747’s I will admit. The best single way to go from the UK to Australia for instance, is from MAN with Singapore. They put on the 777, and if you go to (for instance) Melbourne you get a 777 the whole way for the most part. I love the 777 experience, they’re a comfortable and quite ride.

But not all airlines are like that.

On Emirates, you should avoid the 777 like the plague.

I flew MAN-DXB-MEL last summer and also the return leg. We refuelled in SIN. Their 777’s are so unbelievably cramped you’d be plain surprised! They have 10 abreast, like in a 747 but in a narrower fuselage. The rows are staggered to improve things, but it is really uncomfortable flying. The A330 we got MAN-DXB was so much more comfortable, even though it had a smaller PTV and the same legroon. They stuck to the standard 8 abreast on the A330 and it was a lot better as a result.

I had tried an EK 777 before this, but my trip was originally MAN-DXB on the A330 and DXB-MEL nonstop on the A340. But they cancelled my flights and shunted me on the 777 much to my disgust.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 9th March 2005 at 22:21

The 777’s are better inside than the 747’s I will admit. The best single way to go from the UK to Australia for instance, is from MAN with Singapore. They put on the 777, and if you go to (for instance) Melbourne you get a 777 the whole way for the most part. I love the 777 experience, they’re a comfortable and quite ride.

But not all airlines are like that.

On Emirates, you should avoid the 777 like the plague.

I flew MAN-DXB-MEL last summer and also the return leg. We refuelled in SIN. Their 777’s are so unbelievably cramped you’d be plain surprised! They have 10 abreast, like in a 747 but in a narrower fuselage. The rows are staggered to improve things, but it is really uncomfortable flying. The A330 we got MAN-DXB was so much more comfortable, even though it had a smaller PTV and the same legroon. They stuck to the standard 8 abreast on the A330 and it was a lot better as a result.

I had tried an EK 777 before this, but my trip was originally MAN-DXB on the A330 and DXB-MEL nonstop on the A340. But they cancelled my flights and shunted me on the 777 much to my disgust.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,810

Send private message

By: wannabe pilot - 9th March 2005 at 22:13

What’s LH?

Lufthansa.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,810

Send private message

By: wannabe pilot - 9th March 2005 at 22:13

What’s LH?

Lufthansa.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

525

Send private message

By: Himanshu - 9th March 2005 at 21:36

What’s LH?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

525

Send private message

By: Himanshu - 9th March 2005 at 21:36

What’s LH?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 9th March 2005 at 02:20

SQ B747s are not modernised enough… unlike the 777s, the 777s have great leg and arm room unlike SQ 747s. Himanshu, try Virgin, BA, LH or if you like daring experiences..AI.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 9th March 2005 at 02:20

SQ B747s are not modernised enough… unlike the 777s, the 777s have great leg and arm room unlike SQ 747s. Himanshu, try Virgin, BA, LH or if you like daring experiences..AI.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 8th March 2005 at 23:45

You’ve not exactly experienced the 747 at its best.

British Airways or Virgin Atlantic rank far higher that Singapore when it comes to Economy, I beleive.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 8th March 2005 at 23:45

You’ve not exactly experienced the 747 at its best.

British Airways or Virgin Atlantic rank far higher that Singapore when it comes to Economy, I beleive.

Sign in to post a reply