dark light

  • TonyT

Slight thread drift RAF Tucano 2013 scheme based on 72 Sqn North Africa

Looks sweet

http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/506621-2013-raf-tucano-display-scheme-revealed.html

http://www.globalaviationresource.com/reports/2013/airshows-uk-2013-raf-tucano-display-scheme-revealed/images/4.jpg

Should work better than the previous Hawk scheme, they had probs seeing each other at low level I believe.

Sorry not totally historical, but one day it will be 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

480

Send private message

By: Cherry Ripe - 1st February 2013 at 15:27

What about in a 1 on 1 engagement? Is the Tucano more powerfull, engine wise, speedwise than the Spit?

I was trying to cheat 🙂

Dynamic

Don’t have data to hand but I would expect a late-war single seater to eat the Tucano in the horizontal plane. It’s not designed for instantaneous turning and I don’t recall any requirements in the AST spec.

But in the vertical plane. Tucano initial climb-rate is from the mid-2000 to mid-3000 fps in “standard” trim ( 2.5 tonnes, training mission, two crew ). That’s late-1930s fighter performance and on-par with this for a Mk IIA Spit. AST spec was 6 minutes to 15,000 feet and this was achieved.

Power-loading actually favours the Tucano against early-model Spits, particularly at altitude, with 1,110 shp from the TPE331. But I expect that advantage to drop-off as installed power increased in later Marks.

Structural

The Belfast Tucano is stressed to sustain +6 / -3 G every day for its 12,000 hour service life ( at training weights ).

The Spitfire, from what I can see, was specified in the original F7 / 30 for 9 G ultimate load, i.e. structure will likely fail beyond that. Probably still has the edge on paper and no-one really paid attention to G-loadings during wartime unless it came back bent. They didn’t have G-meters fitted… so I don’t know how hard they actually pushed them in combat.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,685

Send private message

By: hampden98 - 1st February 2013 at 12:34

A fully-fueled Tucano has a cruising endurance of a little over six hours. I think it could probably dawdle around at, say, 28,000 feet, and wait for the Spit to return to base 🙂

What about in a 1 on 1 engagement? Is the Tucano more powerfull, engine wise, speedwise than the Spit?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

480

Send private message

By: Cherry Ripe - 30th January 2013 at 16:40

So, in a dogfight which would win, Tucano or Spitfire? Assuming you fitted some guns to the Tucano of course!

A fully-fueled Tucano has a cruising endurance of a little over six hours. I think it could probably dawdle around at, say, 28,000 feet, and wait for the Spit to return to base 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,685

Send private message

By: hampden98 - 30th January 2013 at 16:32

So, in a dogfight which would win, Tucano or Spitfire? Assuming you fitted some guns to the Tucano of course!

Sign in to post a reply