November 2, 2005 at 7:49 pm
Got the latest edition of FP today and noted the serial of Spitfire BL655 among the survivors. Judging by the pics this is a very substantial wreck but what was the story of it’s crash and subsequent recovery?
Cheers
Cees
By: Rich Woods - 3rd November 2005 at 19:01
I saw BL655 at East Kirkby earlier this year. It captivated me and I’m still not sure why.
The best reason I can come up with is I know what a beautiful machine it was (and to some extent still is), yet it represents such a violent end to a young man’s life and to the machine itself.
All I kept thinking of while I was looking at it were the words to “High Flight”.
All in all a very poigniant display of the remains.
Regards,
Richard
By: JonathanF - 3rd November 2005 at 17:53
The show Most Haunted had coverage of this crash and the death of its unfortunate pilot.
How very tasteful and appropriate of them.
By: Mark12 - 3rd November 2005 at 17:31
Cees, David.
When belts are being tightened I think it is policy to do work ‘in house’ rather than sub contract it out to people like me.
This is ‘list of lists’ researching.
The two that stuck out most to me were the HFL Burmese Mk IX listed as PV270, which of course is located in New Zealand and hasn’t been anywhere near the UK in 60 odd years and I see the myth of ‘ML411’/G-CBNU, the infamous ‘Turkish Spitfire’, is still being perpetuated.
Mark
By: David Burke - 3rd November 2005 at 17:08
Mark 12 – I was waiting for some comments on the list! It’s a little stray on some!
By: HP57 - 3rd November 2005 at 16:58
Cees
The list in the current Flypast doesn’t do anybody any favours.
I noted about 20 errors without even referring to files. 🙁
Mark
Mark,
I also noticed that the list was compiled by others than yourself. Has this something to do with the previous listing?
Just curious
Cees
By: Mark12 - 3rd November 2005 at 16:47
UK Spitfire survivors.
I agree, but it’s strange to read that it is counted as a potential survior (meaning complete airframe in my book)
Cees
Cees
The list in the current Flypast doesn’t do anybody any favours.
I noted about 20 errors without even referring to files. 🙁
Mark
By: HP57 - 3rd November 2005 at 16:33
Because it’s a beautiful piece of wreckology .I cannot see any reason to scrap all the airframe parts and build a brand new Spitfire round the various parts that are servicable. It’s about preservation not profit.
I agree, but it’s strange to read that it is counted as a potential survior (meaning complete airframe in my book)
Cees
By: Peter - 3rd November 2005 at 14:54
The show Most Haunted had coverage of this crash and the death of its unfortunate pilot.
By: David Burke - 3rd November 2005 at 12:44
Because it’s a beautiful piece of wreckology .I cannot see any reason to scrap all the airframe parts and build a brand new Spitfire round the various parts that are servicable. It’s about preservation not profit.
By: Flat 12x2 - 3rd November 2005 at 12:13
……… is this the one at East Kirkby? A very powerful display I have always thought.
Yes I believe it is, saw it during the forum East Kirkby/BBMF visit earlier this year, I did wonder at the time why it isn’t being restored to fly seeing as it is relatively complete compared to other Spit restorations 😉
By: Hatton - 3rd November 2005 at 11:45
Cees, Im afraid I have nothing to add except another question, is this the one at East Kirkby? A very powerful display I have always thought.
By: Bruce - 3rd November 2005 at 11:42
No, I’ll give you an answer.
BL655 was as I recall the subject of a fairly extensive dig, which ended up with the usual broken wreckage being brought to the surface. What you see here is the result of a convincing reconstruction of the wreckage. It is really very good. I was very impressed when I saw it some years ago.
Bruce
By: Robbo_ - 3rd November 2005 at 11:29
This post has been edited and the content deleted.
It was a malicious post from Robbo (space) not Robbo of “Pain Talk”, who has asked me to remove it immediately and track the IP address.
Funny old world. 🙂
Mark