March 26, 2007 at 10:12 pm
A question was asked at work today which Spitfire flying has the most flying hours. PM631 has over 2600 is there any other Spitfire that has flown more than this?
By: Mark V - 2nd April 2007 at 18:21
Try 100 landings!
Pintlel bolts out and off for crack testing and alignment check – as with all things Spitfire not a cheap operation.
Yes – you are right (but you can’t spell pintle) 😀
By: proplover - 2nd April 2007 at 12:03
Try 100 landings!
Pintlel bolts out and off for crack testing and alignment check – as with all things Spitfire not a cheap operation.
By: Mark V - 2nd April 2007 at 09:01
Good point Cees – there have been incidents of failures caused by ‘fatigue’, ‘stress’. etc. There is now a mandatory check which has to be undertaken on the pintle studs (the long bolts that secure the pintle to the wing spar) on all CAA registered after a certain number of landings (250 I think). However the point remains that the Spitfire airframe does not have an overall fatigue life in the way more modern types do.
By: Cees Broere - 2nd April 2007 at 08:50
IIRC there was an accident with one of the Schreiner target tug Spitfires at Texel during 1957 where an undercarriage pintle sheared due to fatigue. Ever since the Dutch RLD considered the Spitfire to be an “unsafe” type.
The airframe was tired by this time having been flown for over a decade.
This was one of the reasons that MK732 was first registered in the UK.
Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Cheers
Cees
By: Tony Kearns - 1st April 2007 at 15:30
It isnt.
Bex you are thinking about later RAF aircraft. No Spitfires were retired through ‘fatigue’ as this was not a recognised problem in WWII and no fatigue measuring process was in place for this type.
You make an interesting point Mark V, do you know what the position was with Spitfires operating with other Air Forces into the fifties and sixties, excluding shortage of spares of course?
Tony K
By: Mark V - 1st April 2007 at 11:07
So if Spitfires dont have fatigue index, how is fatigue measured? Especially I was under the impression that part of the reason for an aircrafts retirement was down to fatigue? Bex
It isnt.
Bex you are thinking about later RAF aircraft. No Spitfires were retired through ‘fatigue’ as this was not a recognised problem in WWII and no fatigue measuring process was in place for this type.
By: bexWH773 - 1st April 2007 at 10:25
So if Spitfires dont have fatigue index, how is fatigue measured? Especially I was under the impression that part of the reason for an aircrafts retirement was down to fatigue? Bex
By: Mark V - 1st April 2007 at 09:05
Just out of interest, do Spits have a Fatigue Index as per Chippys/Bullodgs?
No.
By: BlueRobin - 31st March 2007 at 19:41
Just out of interest, do Spits have a Fatigue Index as per Chippys/Bullodgs?
By: Ontario-Warbird - 31st March 2007 at 15:01
Even with it being grounded since 2000, I would think MK923 would have quite a few hours on it. I know Jerry B racked up alot of hours when it was in his care.
Dave C
By: Flying High - 29th March 2007 at 20:01
Grace Spitfire hours
Had a conversation with Carolyn grace last year, in which I think she said her spitfire was limited to a max of 50 hours and this was connected with the plane’s insurance policy. If that helps.
She also said it takes her over 40 hrs of paperwork each week to keep it in the air, every week outside of the display times, something which is worth knowing and appreciating.
By: ollieholmes - 29th March 2007 at 19:30
I was privilaged to be shown around G-RRGN two years ago. I spent about 2-3 hours at East Midlands taking detailed pics of the aircraft for a modelling project.
According to the guy who showed me around (sorry his name eludes me at the moment but a top chap) she is the most original flying Spitfire having never gone through a major restoration.
In places you can still see the original wartime paint, which is a very differant blue to that which she wears now.
Either way though she is a stunning Spitfire.
That does not suprise me as she was one of the origional BBMF fleet. But from what ive herd from a freind who flys from the same place as she is based she does not seem to fly often.
By: Phantom Phixer - 29th March 2007 at 13:42
I was privilaged to be shown around G-RRGN two years ago. I spent about 2-3 hours at East Midlands taking detailed pics of the aircraft for a modelling project.
According to the guy who showed me around (sorry his name eludes me at the moment but a top chap) she is the most original flying Spitfire having never gone through a major restoration.
In places you can still see the original wartime paint, which is a very differant blue to that which she wears now.
Either way though she is a stunning Spitfire.
By: cas - 29th March 2007 at 01:00
G-RRGN rolls royce 1263
By: DazDaMan - 28th March 2007 at 12:20
Didn,t she have a couple of “off” seasons due to engine gremlins?
I can only think of one in the past few years… anyone else?
By: QldSpitty - 28th March 2007 at 09:09
IIRC
Didn,t she have a couple of “off” seasons due to engine gremlins?
By: Mark V - 27th March 2007 at 20:14
113 hours in the past 20 years???? :confused:
Hmm – something seems not quite right there. I would have expected more like 600 + hours in her current post restoration life, but then I am only guessing.
By: Mark V - 27th March 2007 at 20:10
Thats why I asked!
Tony K
Ah – you want to know how many hours she flew last year! 🙂
Not many UK warbirds doing more than 50 so it will be interesting to find out.
By: Tony Kearns - 27th March 2007 at 20:01
1195 as at the end of 2005 (see post 10).
Thats why I asked!
Tony K
By: Mark V - 27th March 2007 at 19:33
Perhaps Carolyn could tell us the present number of hours.
1195 as at the end of 2005 (see post 10).