Spitfire porn……(sorry)

Fence sitter:p

well not realy !! cammo and tone cannot be a guide as they were painted with the same cammo schemes and would be lit with the samelight from the same angle also a lot of old cameras gave severeley short depths of field

aero cameras have much larger apertures than our standard cameras for starters fine for photographing the ground at a set distance as the huge apertures gave fast exposure speeds

but as for photographing anything else i’d presume a very shallow depth of field would result

there was no dout it was a real aircraft , models are good ( but nowhere near that standard )

definateley good photoshopping though

Damn! Her “Mae West” has been inspected….. 🙁

agreed there is a likeleyhood of photoshopping but there’s also the chance of it being genuine

i take nothing as first seems with images there is the good chance it can be either !!

Fence sitter:p

good spot

Well done Daz and Mark12:D

BM597 visiting Plymouth Sept 2006.

This is the original photo I took on the day (boring and miles away), when trying to make it ‘better’ I got a bit carried away. This is about 20 minutes on photoshop, thought at the time cam was a bit ‘samey’ for all three, however, it was never meant to be published and it didn’t take long for you guys to become suspicious. Good work.

I’ll dig out more later!

Baz

*cough* BM597 *cough*

😉

Amazing similarity of the camouflage tone and style on all ‘three’ Spitfires. 🙂

Mark

You’re right Mark12. Going even further, it’s pretty clear to me that it’s actually a model kit. Look at the photo full size, and you will see clear indications in the way the aircraft has been “weathered”. Also, the smoke staining from the guns looks way too defined and too long as well. There are other obvious giveaways too. Nicely done regardless though.

Cheers,
Richard

Wrong!

Pete

Okay, I stand corrected, You came up with an interesting spitfire photo!

Where is that norty Spitfireman to confirm or deny these speculations?

Richard

don’t let depth of feild guide you i have sean old photo’s with increadibly shallow depth of feild

i have seen shots of early vehicles where the background a couple of feet behind is blurred

agreed there is a likeleyhood of photoshopping but there’s also the chance of it being genuine

i take nothing as first seems with images there is the good chance it can be either !!

Amazing similarity of the camouflage tone and style on all ‘three’ Spitfires. 🙂

Mark

:rolleyes:

. I’m dubious of the depth of field putting the other two spits so far out of focus. They are all in the same camo scheme too, with the same shadows

Richard

Let’s wait and see

don’t let depth of feild guide you i have sean old photo’s with increadibly shallow depth of feild

i have seen shots of early vehicles where the background a couple of feet behind is blurred

agreed there is a likeleyhood of photoshopping but there’s also the chance of it being genuine

i take nothing as first seems with images there is the good chance it can be either !!

Blimey Daz, anything with a pulse!:rolleyes:

Female, human, alive.
Yep, worthy of a punt.

She’s lovely.
Does she Spit?

Fazackerly!

Richard

I’m sure there’s some photoshopping there. The cut off around the edges is odd. I’m dubious of the depth of field putting the other two spits so far out of focus.Richard

What other two Spits?

Surely they are all the same aircraft. 🙂

Mark

😮 More Spitfires.?… nooooooooooooooooooooo

unless of course it is modern photoshopping !!

I’m sure there’s some photoshopping there. The cut off around the edges is odd. I’m dubious of the depth of field putting the other two spits so far out of focus. They are all in the same camo scheme too, with the same shadows

I’m still not convinced by the front Spit. The lighting says yes, the detail says no…

Richard

Let’s wait and see

She is a real looker Pete………….girl looks nice too.:)

she’s rank !! she has horrible hands !! probably older than the photo gives first impressions of ….:diablo:

a superb shooting oppertunity of a spitfire ruined

She shouldnt be using that life jacket its out of date.

Richard

Wrong!

Pete

Oh look, an inflatable woman to go with Baz’s inflatable Spitfire…. :diablo::rolleyes:;)