August 17, 2004 at 2:58 pm
All,
I am trying to work out whether anything of this one actually remains as there are conflicting reports,
[INDENT]Spitfire International
Aung Sang Park of Royal Lakes, Yangon (Rangoon). Displayed
Wrecked in storm (1968)
Defence Services Museum, Yangon (Rangoon). Fuselage remains into a diorama of Sea Fury UB466
Warbirds Directory Vol.4
(to Union of Burma AF as UB431) .56
Aung San Park, Royal Lakes, Rangoon, Burma 60/75
dam. by storm, scrapped c75[/INDENT]
Can anyone help (paging Mark12 :D)
By: Mark12 - 18th August 2004 at 14:39
This one must be it.
Cheers Paul,
“15 February 1961 A Republic of China Air Force PB4Y was shot down by Burmese fighter aircraft, near the Thai-Burmese border, killing the crew of five. “
A very informative site and one to bookmark.
Mark
By: Whitley_Project - 18th August 2004 at 14:31
Elliott,
I am 99% sure it was a ‘Privateer’.
That would account why I thought it was a B-24, similar and family and you thought it was four engines, a tall single fin and looked like a Warwick.
What say you?
Mark
That would be more like it!
By: paulmcmillan - 18th August 2004 at 14:28
PB4Y-2 Privateer
http://home.sprynet.com/~anneled/ColdWar.html
Also see:
http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_346.shtml
http://www.heroinflight.com/planes.html
and
The latter 3 all say B-24 but I reckon Privateer (definately Consolidateed not Vickers!)
By: Mark12 - 18th August 2004 at 13:53
It came to me over lunch.
Elliott,
I am 99% sure it was a ‘Privateer’.
That would account why I thought it was a B-24, similar and family and you thought it was four engines, a tall single fin and looked like a Warwick.
What say you?
Mark
By: Whitley_Project - 18th August 2004 at 12:54
Elliott
http://www.drugtext.org/library/books/McCoy/book/29.htm
The above will be a bit heavy for most but if the CIA were funding the KMT through Taiwan I think a B-24 would be more probable than a Warwick.
The pilot of the Seafury was either P/O or F/O Peters who would be I guess Anglo-Burmese. He shot the ‘aircraft’ down before crashing landing one side or the other of the Burma/Thai border. He is their greatest Air Force hero.
Mark
Yes, that’s right it was Peters and very proud of him they were too. I don’t suppose the Burmese Air Force have many kills to their credit after all 😉
Well, just remember the many exotic types that ended up in China (Curtis Condors, Demons etc., Gloster biplane types to name a few) and the fact that Wellingtons were used against the Japanese it’s not impossible.
More likely it is a B-24 but you never know – the aircraft in the painting DID look like a Wellington/Warwick.
By: Mark12 - 18th August 2004 at 12:48
‘Spooky’
Hello Mark
I visited the diorama a few weeks after you and I recall (i may be wrong as it seemed EXTREMELY exotic for that part of the world) that the smoking aircraft was a vickers warwick! This was a fair while ago and there were so many wonderful distractions in myanmar I wouldn’t put any money on it, but it did stick in my mind.Elliott
Elliott
http://www.drugtext.org/library/books/McCoy/book/29.htm
The above will be a bit heavy for most but if the CIA were funding the KMT through Taiwan I think a B-24 would be more probable than a Warwick.
The pilot of the Seafury was either P/O or F/O Peters who would be I guess Anglo-Burmese. He shot the ‘aircraft’ down before crashing landing one side or the other of the Burma/Thai border. He is their greatest Air Force hero.
Mark
By: Whitley_Project - 18th August 2004 at 12:13
Bruising from the storm in the 1970’s would be my guess.
Mark
Hello Mark
I visited the diorama a few weeks after you and I recall (i may be wrong as it seemed EXTREMELY exotic for that part of the world) that the smoking aircraft was a vickers warwick! This was a fair while ago and there were so many wonderful distractions in myanmar I wouldn’t put any money on it, but it did stick in my mind.
Elliott
By: Mark12 - 18th August 2004 at 11:57
The damage to the l/edge of the tailplane is interesting. Deliberate for the display, or a witness mark for other ‘work’?
Bruising from the storm in the 1970’s would be my guess.
Mark
By: JDK - 18th August 2004 at 11:49
The damage to the l/edge of the tailplane is interesting. Deliberate for the display, or a witness mark for other ‘work’?
By: jbs - 18th August 2004 at 11:37
Mark,
Great information, thanks for clearing that one up
It does make you wonder as you say where the rest of it is (or went to) though…
Thanks again
By: Mark12 - 18th August 2004 at 10:49
UB431 – Rangoon
JBS
UB431 was on display at the Royal Lakes in Aung Sang Park, Rangoon until damaged by a storm in the early 1970’s. It was reported as scrapped but I believe it was removed and dumped in an ‘Army compound’ and forgotten, as happens in Myanmar.
To commemorate a glorious military action in Burmese history, when the new Defence Services museum was opened in 1995/6 a crash scene diorama was created of this action between the UBAF Seafury UB466 and from memory a Taiwanese B-24. Replicating a posted press photo of the time, a reduced scale Centaurus was placed in perspective and the Seafury tail group and rear fuselage was represented using a section cut from a Mk IX Spitfire.
After much pressing and asking I was told that the section came from the ‘Army Compound’ and was from the former display machine. It is logical, but I would only put 95% certainty on it. It begs the question – what happened to the rest of it – and this is in hand but it is hard work in Myanmar with all their troubles.
Mark
UB431 photo by George Errington – taken in 1956