dark light

'Spitfires Over Berlin' magazine – Warning

I hope Key Publishing are ok with this thread, as the topic is a competitors magazine. If the thread disappears, I understand why.

Just a heads up, chaps/chapesses, about this publication, and a word of caution. During a perusal of the news stand while stocking up on holiday stuff, I scanned the title, ‘Spitfires Over Berlin’ and quickly moved on. Seeing the ‘S’ word, with an ok painting of a Mk XIV confirmed to me that, love it though I do, I did not want to buy a Spitfire Special.

However, I had the chance to scan through a copy on holiday, and realised that the Spitfire heading was there to pull in the punters…the actual content of this magazine comprises of 20 mostly high quality examinations of specific aspects of the late air war in Europe, many of which I had not seen before. In fairness to the publisher, the sub-heading of the mag is ‘The air war in Europe 1945’. My favourite articles so far (there’s a lot to get through) examine test flying the Natter, and the best single seaters of 1945…I never knew that the D-9 was only made because of the shortage of the BMW 801 powerplant; the TA 152 was Tank’s intended replacement for the 190. This ‘best fighter’ article is interesting in that it mostly steers away from fastest speed, longest range etc and, heaven forbid, is actually critical of the P-51, a rare read indeed! There are usually holes in a technical narrative, but I’ve only spotted one major omission so far. So well done Dan Sharp and contributors, and Mortons, I’m impressed!

Key, may I just also say that the September Flypast is also CHOKKA with good articles.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,097

Send private message

By: Seafuryfan - 9th August 2015 at 19:49

Oldgit, sorry it wasn’t your cup of tea. Steve, you’re intuition is uncanny! Actually I was rather pleased as the XIV has always been a favourite of mine. I remember how, according to Clostermann, the Tempest V and Spitfire pilots verbally gave each other stick, tongue in cheek mind. And, of course, know, it’s all academic. They were all brave men and the attrition rate right to the end was terrible.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 9th August 2015 at 18:23

Yes John, it was vulnerable to enemy fire which was not good during strafing runs, and in a turning fight it had a larger radius of turn. I suspect this was due to the laminar wing design. Mark 12, you’ll be pleased with the ‘winner’ of the 20 compared types 🙂

Seafuryfan,

Many thanks for the info.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

520

Send private message

By: oldgit158 - 9th August 2015 at 11:59

I also saw this in my local WH Smith’s..waste of good money

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

853

Send private message

By: RAFRochford - 9th August 2015 at 11:29

Well, Eric Brown has often said that he thought the Spitfire XIV was the best…was that the articles conclusion?

….Or maybe I should just buy a copy!

Regards;
Steve

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,162

Send private message

By: Mike J - 9th August 2015 at 11:26

An oft-repeated myth. Statistically as many P-47s and P-38s were lost to ground fire as P-51s.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,097

Send private message

By: Seafuryfan - 9th August 2015 at 08:49

Yes John, it was vulnerable to enemy fire which was not good during strafing runs, and in a turning fight it had a larger radius of turn. I suspect this was due to the laminar wing design. Mark 12, you’ll be pleased with the ‘winner’ of the 20 compared types 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 8th August 2015 at 19:50

Seafuryfan

Can you expand on the criticism of the P51 ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 8th August 2015 at 11:38

I’ve heard it said that ‘Britain at War’ is pretty good this month, too! 😉

Sign in to post a reply