dark light

Spotted – SNAFU air to air

I thought i’d like to join the I want to post it first brigade and tell everyone that I have just seen SNAFU leave the east of Newmarket area over Kennett and Kentford heading home after what has seemed to be a half hour air to air with a single engined piper or beechcraft type that was obviously acting as camera ship and even managed to get a photo of the occasion on my little point and shoot.
Looking at them afterwards, I now notice that SNAFU has a star & bar under both wings?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

66

Send private message

By: The Big Picture - 30th May 2012 at 20:42

They may have done ‘LOTS’ of research but the B&W photos of the original Snafu don’t show the invasion stripes going right round the fuselage….

http://media.photobucket.com/image/snafu%20p47/Bomber_12th/P-47DSnafu.jpg

Photos of the original aircraft show it at Duxford Pre D Day without stripes and the shot you mention.

So it must of had the full stripes at some stage.

Its a bit like TFCs Mk 14 Spitfire , at the time it was painted it was with the best Knowledge at the time, as JE-J then a few weeks later someone shows up with an original wartime shot showing the code letters as JEJ.

Ok it may not please everyone but at least they are flying for us to enjoy.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

456

Send private message

By: Dobbins - 30th May 2012 at 14:13

Just read on another forum that one of the stars and bars under the wings should be bigger than the other. Has this been replicated?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

870

Send private message

By: Graham Boak - 30th May 2012 at 13:36

On a old B&W photo of a well worn painted aircraft at the angles it is, I don’t know how you can determine that? I can look all along that wing and see the same tone/light shading differences.
I just can’t see the definitive differences that you have drawn the conclusion from.

I can see a change of tone on the fuselage in the precise position where the stripes will have been painted over. You should indeed see a similar effect on the wing, for the stripes will have been overpainted there too. The progression of the stripes from the full over and under wings and fuselage from June 5th, to undersides only in July, then underfuselage only in September, has been well described and thoroughly documented in photographs – though the date of the overpainting of the uppersurfaces does vary from type to type.

If SNAFU was in service for D-Day, as I believe is the case, then it will have carried a full set of stripes, which will have been partially overpainted to produce the effect seen. How anyone prefers to have her represented is a matter of taste not historical accuracy.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

853

Send private message

By: RAFRochford - 30th May 2012 at 13:14

…So does that mean that the original SNAFU was exempt from the directive issued for the application of invasion stripes before D-Day then?

Regards;
Steve

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

456

Send private message

By: Dobbins - 30th May 2012 at 13:01

There are plenty of original photos of Snafu and none of them show the stripes extending above the star and bars. Most of these photos are of her after she bellylanded and was then scrapped so it would make more sense to recreate her as she ended her life, so to speak. Plus, as a matter of simple aesthetics the full invasion stripes look very over the top.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

853

Send private message

By: RAFRochford - 30th May 2012 at 12:31

I was always of the understanding that the original orders for the painting of invasion stripes dictated that the stripes were to be painted all around the fuselage and above and below the wings. As time went on post D-Day, many units camouflaged over the stripes on the upper sufaces of the wings and upper portions of the fuselage. This is backed up by many photographs.

Surely, as Graham says, this is purely a question of dates, as I would imagine that TFC have gone for a period in SNAFU’s career nearer June 1944.

Regards;
Steve

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

784

Send private message

By: Bomberboy - 30th May 2012 at 12:14

The photo does however show a change of tone where the stripes have been overpainted, so it becomes a matter of dates. Both are correct, at different times.

On a old B&W photo of a well worn painted aircraft at the angles it is, I don’t know how you can determine that? I can look all along that wing and see the same tone/light shading differences.
I just can’t see the definitive differences that you have drawn the conclusion from.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

870

Send private message

By: Graham Boak - 30th May 2012 at 11:51

They may have done ‘LOTS’ of research but the B&W photos of the original Snafu don’t show the invasion stripes going right round the fuselage….

http://media.photobucket.com/image/snafu%20p47/Bomber_12th/P-47DSnafu.jpg

The photo does however show a change of tone where the stripes have been overpainted, so it becomes a matter of dates. Both are correct, at different times.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

784

Send private message

By: Bomberboy - 30th May 2012 at 10:45

Can you upload that picture you took of the air to air?

Unfortunately, I am not able to do that with my work system. there are many things that it won’t allow me to connect to.
Mike J, perhaps you could help me out here?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

456

Send private message

By: Dobbins - 30th May 2012 at 08:58

They may have done ‘LOTS’ of research but the B&W photos of the original Snafu don’t show the invasion stripes going right round the fuselage….

http://media.photobucket.com/image/snafu%20p47/Bomber_12th/P-47DSnafu.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

717

Send private message

By: CIRCUS 6 - 30th May 2012 at 05:25

Star and Bar under both wings is correct, I think they are 63″ diameter. The TFC guys will tell you more, they did LOTS of research into it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,162

Send private message

By: Mike J - 28th May 2012 at 20:25

It was the Matadors, being shot from an RV-8. Dibbs again!

Then he jumped into a Bonanza with the door off and went up again to shoot the P-47

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

720

Send private message

By: darrenharbar - 28th May 2012 at 19:53

A certain Mr J Dibbs was noted at Duxford today. I wonder if he was involved? 😀

I would say that’s a fair 2+2 = 4 assumption Mike 🙂 Looking forward to seeing the results. There was another air-to-air taking place over Cambridge earlier today at quite some hieght with a pair of aerobatic aircraft. Far to high to see what they were, but they had smoke! 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,162

Send private message

By: Mike J - 28th May 2012 at 19:06

A certain Mr J Dibbs was noted at Duxford today. I wonder if he was involved? 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

969

Send private message

By: 8674planes - 28th May 2012 at 17:47

Can you upload that picture you took of the air to air?

Sign in to post a reply