dark light

Talk about irony…VB cries foul!!

Virgin Blue has lashed out at politicians and others backing a Singapore Airlines bid to fly between Australia and the US, warning they could undermine its $1 billion plan to launch a new international carrier.
The airline says comments by backbenchers and other commentators that Australia’s aviation policy should be reviewed if a private equity takeover of Qantas is successful show little understanding of the international aviation system which was “a political quagmire full of self-interest”.
Several coalition backbenchers have argued that Qantas should no longer be protected on the trans-Pacific route if the $11.1 billion deal goes ahead. A target’s statement is due to be released today.

Virgin says the comments fail to acknowledge that its new carrier, to be launched next year, will create more Australian jobs, bring tourists and provide choice and vigorous competition on the trans-Pacific route.

“Virgin believes strongly in competition as long as it’s fair,” Virgin chief executive Brett Godfrey says in an opinion piece published in The Australian today. “What would not be fair, nor clever, would be to openly invite these privileged international airlines to cherry pick and compete with Australian startup carriers without considering the findings of the 2006 aviation review.”

But Singapore Airlines’ Stephen Forshaw dismissed Virgin’s warning as the same arguments used by Qantas to keep competition out of “one of the world’s most protected air routes”. “Continued protection costs Australia and Australians. Australians want to see competitors challenge the protection club, not join it,” he said.

Mr Forshaw said passengers flying the route knew the lack of competition had pushed up prices and kept them high, deterring tourists and depriving Australia of more than $110 million a year in direct tourism expenditure.

“Virgin Blue appeals to keep protection in place so it can benefit: an irony for the airline which started by campaigning to ‘keep the air fair’,” he said.

Mr Godfrey’s warning came as Singapore-backed Tiger Airways said yesterday it would be prepared to add more planes if the launch of its domestic carrier this year proved successful.

Tiger announced on Friday that it had applied for regulatory approval to launch an Australian domestic carrier with five Airbus A320 aircraft in what Mr Godfrey argues is an example of the unfairness of the bilateral aviation system.

He says Australian airlines are unable to do the same in other countries without taking a local partner, although Mr Forshaw said that in Singapore’s case this was only because the island was too small for a domestic market.

Tiger is promising to use its no-frills Ryanair-based model to significantly undercut fares and could prove an increasingly painful thorn in Virgin’s side.

Tiger chief executive Tony Davis told ABC television yesterday that the airline would be spending up $10 million launching the airline, and that it would be prepared to add aircraft if the venture proved successful.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 19th February 2007 at 07:24

NZ ceased to operate LAX-SYD flights around the 2nd half of 2002, around the same time UA ceased to operate LAX-AKL flights. So yeah, they haven’t done that in a while. Hawaiian operates into SYD, by the way.

ah thanks for the corrections.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

14,422

Send private message

By: steve rowell - 19th February 2007 at 04:51

And if you want to take the scenic route you can get there from Cairns via Guam and Honolulu with Continental Micronesia

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: greekdude1 - 18th February 2007 at 18:52

The Australian market is not THAT big, passengers do also have choices of UA, SQ for flights into US. If i remember correctly even Air NewZealand offers LA flights via SYD?

NZ ceased to operate LAX-SYD flights around the 2nd half of 2002, around the same time UA ceased to operate LAX-AKL flights. So yeah, they haven’t done that in a while. Hawaiian operates into SYD, by the way.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 18th February 2007 at 10:43

And not forgetting Hawaiian airlines via Honolulu

ahh didnt know that… into SYD or MEL?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

14,422

Send private message

By: steve rowell - 17th February 2007 at 23:13

The Australian market is not THAT big, passengers do also have choices of UA, SQ for flights into US. If i remember correctly even Air NewZealand offers LA flights via SYD?
.

And not forgetting Hawaiian airlines via Honolulu

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 17th February 2007 at 17:08

Not surprising at all, and its not just VB, with the passengers that Australia offers into US and the big stronghold that VB has to break which is with QF at the moment, am not surprised one bit that they are crying over this. This will be a double blow to them with SQ and the proposed LOCO Tiger coming into play. Not to mention domestically QF offers as good fares as both JetStar and VB.

The Australian market is not THAT big, passengers do also have choices of UA, SQ for flights into US. If i remember correctly even Air NewZealand offers LA flights via SYD?

VB will have a big competition to break.

Sign in to post a reply