By: AlanR - 18th April 2015 at 23:18
If you look at at the reviews (on Amazon for instance), a lot of owner seem quite happy with them.
When you look at some of the magazine reviews, they seem somewhat less impressed.
It’s all very confusing. I’m still hanging on to my money.
By: Rob68 - 18th April 2015 at 22:45
Thinking of the Nikkor 18-300 ,myself, anyone had experience?
By: AlanR - 4th April 2015 at 17:15
I didn’t realize that Nikon do a similar lens, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR Lens
I was very tempted, but I think I may stick with my Nikon 55-300mm for now. The superzoom has a lot of very good
reviews, although the photographic purists aren’t impressed.
I may just save my money, and carry on having to swap lenses.
By: AlanR - 13th March 2015 at 12:30
Only just noticed this reply, thanks.
By: Pen Pusher - 9th March 2015 at 22:09
I used the full frame version of the Tamron (28-300mm) lens, for the Northolt Night Shoot photos. I’m quite impressed with the image quality from it, don’t know what the cropped sensor version is like though.
Brian
By: AlanR - 2nd March 2015 at 15:51
No I hadn’t seen that, cheers
I’ve read a few reviews, and not seen two the same.
By: Arabella-Cox - 2nd March 2015 at 12:31
You may have already seen this. I find their reviews to be balanced and useful.
http://www.lenstip.com/405.11-Lens_review-Tamron_16-300_mm_f_3.5-6.3_Di_II_VC_PZD_MACRO_Summary.html
By: AlanR - 1st March 2015 at 10:26
As this is a relatively new lens out, perhaps nobody here has experience of it yet ?
How about Tamron lenses in general, what do people think ?
Sign In
February 28, 2015 at 4:02 pm