Sorry about the photos. Today a TCX took the wrong taxi-way at NCL, things got a bit a messed up. The Islandflug that had just landed had to wait at the top end of the taxi-way for the TCX then they both had to wait for a MYT to land then the TCX could enter the runway backtrack and take off runway 25. :rolleyes:
By: Jeanske_SN - 13th July 2004 at 20:15
Oh well, I tought they didn’t use the 146 to Newcastle.
Sorry about that what I said, was a bit frustrated. Forget about it.
By: Bmused55 - 13th July 2004 at 15:37
LOL, Line of the day 😀
*bows*
By: frankvw - 13th July 2004 at 15:34
Well, you CAN externally distinguish a BAe 146 from an Avro RJ: The BAe has a little trapezoidal bumper under the tail, which was discarded on the ARJ.
AND Janske, I can assure you that SN also uses BAe 146. I flew in one some months ago.
By: Mark L - 13th July 2004 at 15:28
SN Brussels send the A319, 146-200, and RJ85 to Newcastle, so they easily could have seen a 146 and not an RJ85. The 2 are indistinguishable from each other anyway, unless of course you can see the registrations.
Jeanske gets it wrong…again :rolleyes:
By: LBARULES - 13th July 2004 at 15:16
Jeanske, your a fine one to talk about getting facts right.
Mr. Fiction that you are 😉
LOL, Line of the day 😀
By: Bmused55 - 13th July 2004 at 07:36
SN ARJ!! 😉
A
R
J
DONT FORGET!!! AVRO REGIONAL JET! NO 146!
Why don’t people learn the difference!
Why sorry for the pictures? It’s better than none at all 😀
Jeanske, your a fine one to talk about getting facts right.
Mr. Fiction that you are 😉
By: dc10fan - 12th July 2004 at 23:14
More to the point, SN Brussels operate both types hence a/c seen could be either 146 or ARJ.
By: Johnny - 12th July 2004 at 22:34
Sorry about my mistake Jeanske, although I still fail to see any major difference between the arj and the BAe146, thus I get the two mixed up often.
By: Skymonster - 12th July 2004 at 22:33
SN ARJ!! 😉
A
R
J
DONT FORGET!!! AVRO REGIONAL JET! NO 146!
Why don’t people learn the difference!
I bet you’re the sort who says “hey, look, here comes a Boeing DC-3” now that Seattle has bought out Long Beach! 😮
Andy
By: RIPConcorde - 12th July 2004 at 22:30
Isn’t an Avro RJ an updated 146?? :confused:
Nice pics by the way! 🙂
By: Grey Area - 12th July 2004 at 22:13
It’s a 146!!!!!
It was made at Woodford on the 146 production line like all the other 146s…..
By: Jeanske_SN - 12th July 2004 at 22:06
SN ARJ!! 😉
A
R
J
DONT FORGET!!! AVRO REGIONAL JET! NO 146!
Why don’t people learn the difference!
Why sorry for the pictures? It’s better than none at all 😀
By: Johnny - 11th July 2004 at 21:33
The same thing happened yesterday at NCL as well. 25 was in use, but the SN 146 and the flybe 146 took off from 07.
By: Britannia - 11th July 2004 at 20:53
Why was the TCX 757 using r/w 25 for take-off when the Isl 737 and Myt 320 had both landed on r/w 07??
The tower said the TCX could use 25 insted of backtracking all the way back down the runway
By: T5 - 11th July 2004 at 20:36
Looks like Thomas Cook just doesn’t run as smooth as it did with WYSIWYG!
By: dc10fan - 11th July 2004 at 19:36
Why was the TCX 757 using r/w 25 for take-off when the Isl 737 and Myt 320 had both landed on r/w 07??
Sign In
July 11, 2004 at 7:21 pm