dark light

  • Fluffy

TE311 Update

Here’s a few piccies to show the progress we are making on TE311

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,108

Send private message

By: Tin Triangle - 24th November 2010 at 00:53

She look sumptious, well done to all concerned. Hope to see her on the circuit in the not-too distant future!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

377

Send private message

By: Jur - 23rd November 2010 at 18:55

A picture of this bird, which I took when visiting the BBMF on 2 September this year. In my view the superb craftsmanship gone into this restoration was already clearly visible.

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/Engeland2010_1385.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,002

Send private message

By: GliderSpit - 23rd November 2010 at 18:12

Great job!! She looks almost ready for her first flight.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,647

Send private message

By: jeepman - 23rd November 2010 at 18:04

That roundel blue sure does look “iffy” and the red is pretty suspect too on my screen… 😮

Instead of blues and twos, the roundel police have blues and reds…..

Nice touch with the sky fuselage band overpainted in Ocean Grey on the MSG underside – that’s attention to detail

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,800

Send private message

By: Oxcart - 23rd November 2010 at 12:59

Personally, I couldn’t care less what shade it’s painted in-I think it looks great! well done to you and your team, Paul

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

720

Send private message

By: darrenharbar - 23rd November 2010 at 11:07

Well done Paul – she is looking superb. Can’t wait to see this old girl fly, as i spent a lot of time with her at RAF Abingdon in the 1980’s. First Spitfire I ever sat in. 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,275

Send private message

By: Bluebird Mike - 23rd November 2010 at 06:39

Fluffy and Co, I do believe you’ve gone and built an aeroplane there!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 23rd November 2010 at 06:37

This is the second time in a week I’ve had to use this pic!

http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/drool-for-sale.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 22nd November 2010 at 22:51

The X-Factor

that has made my day! – just stunning to see something so lovingly restored! BBMF you have the x factor!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

519

Send private message

By: Fluffy - 22nd November 2010 at 22:21

Both colours used by yourself on our a/c:), the red is iffy as it is semi gloss where as the rest is matt. Red will be matt when rear fillets are fitted and painted

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,070

Send private message

By: Roobarb - 22nd November 2010 at 22:16

That roundel blue sure does look “iffy” and the red is pretty suspect too on my screen… 😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

519

Send private message

By: Fluffy - 22nd November 2010 at 21:52

Outside in the sun picture by Karl Bacon

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

561

Send private message

By: mackerel - 18th September 2010 at 22:41

Thanks for the correction Peter ! It still has a large 9 on lower portion of firewall.

Steve.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 18th September 2010 at 22:34

RW 382 started out as low back IX but subsequently had a packard engine fitted.

Steve.

The firewall has/had the large ‘9’ on the lower firewall…as had most XVI’s.

The movement card, before it was stolen, said Mk XVI and initially fitted with a Merlin 266 (Packard).

“It’ll all be in the book” Vol II next year. (Vol I…next month)
Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

561

Send private message

By: mackerel - 18th September 2010 at 22:19

RW 382 started out as low back IX but subsequently had a packard engine fitted.

Steve.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

253

Send private message

By: woodbridge10 - 18th September 2010 at 17:33

funny !
well you ask a simple question…………….
OK going on what ‘Bruce’ states earlier
MK9 = RR Merlin
Mk16 = Packard

therefore should’nt PT462 & SM520 be
XVI(T) or Tr.16

“DISCUSS”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 18th September 2010 at 15:20

OK then, what are PT462 & SM520 as both have Packards ???

Spitfires…?? :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,768

Send private message

By: Mark V - 18th September 2010 at 14:23

Will TE311 have a RR merlin engine or a packard verison??

It looks like it has an engine now, appears to be a Packard Merlin (probably a 266) as there is no seperate inter-cooler header tank.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

253

Send private message

By: woodbridge10 - 18th September 2010 at 13:33

OK then, what are PT462 & SM520 as both have Packards ???

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,370

Send private message

By: Bruce - 18th September 2010 at 11:30

Broadly, and there are also minor detail differences,

Mk 9 – Rolls Merlin

Mk 16 – Packard Merlin.

Bruce

1 2 3 5
Sign in to post a reply