October 24, 2013 at 6:08 pm
Am surprised no-one has posted anything about this so far…
By: Matt-100 - 25th October 2013 at 18:49
There are certain things to do with our industrial and technological heritage that simply must be preserved, and the Concorde is one of them. Shame on BA.
I could be wrong here, but was it not EADS that pulled Concorde from service as they stopped producing the spares? I believe BA would have happily continued flying them for several more years.
That said, even if she had survived past 2003 – she probably wouldn’t have seen past 2009/1010 when the recession was biting heavily into BA’s heels.
A revolutionary aircraft lost forever and even if tomorrow a new supersonic aircraft were announced it wouldn’t be anywhere near as graceful and iconic as Concorde was.
By: Arabella-Cox - 25th October 2013 at 14:22
I quite agree.
There are certain things to do with our industrial and technological heritage that simply must be preserved, and the Concorde is one of them. Shame on BA.
I was trying to describe the sight and sound of a Concorde passing over our school (which is on one of Heathrow’s approach paths) to my class of ten-year-old boys recently, thinking it was such a shame that they weren’t alive to witness the spectacle.
By: Culpano - 24th October 2013 at 19:59
A national disgrace that beauty is no longer flying. The most elegant aircraft ever built IMHO.