November 3, 2007 at 7:20 pm
Anyone know of the progress of this aircraft? Anyone think it wil be airworthy for next years season?
thanks alot
Ross
By: markstringer - 12th November 2007 at 19:52
i beleive it went to chino to have the 2nd seat removed and the cockpit put back to stock condition,
By: The Freshest - 12th November 2007 at 19:39
I saw ‘Little Demon’ in a photograph over on WIX forum in the summer and it was being restored in the same hanger as TFCs’ new P40b. The hangar is in Chino and would assume it is still being restored there.
Here is a video that I found of the very same P47 ‘Little Demon’ flying a good few years ago.
http://www.pozefilm.de/video/p-47g.wmv
Hope this helps
By: DIGBY - 12th November 2007 at 18:53
ah ah the mystery deepens as to where the P47 has gone maybee it is on e-bay and there again maybee it isn’t
By: Pete Truman - 12th November 2007 at 14:26
While sniffing around DX yesterday I found very little of the P-47, a few photographs, bits in boxes and some highly polished areas of wing and engine canopy, so where’s the rest of it then, in the USA or lurking in the covers behind Sally B, which was a hive of activity on it’s blackened port outer.
On another note, I had a walk along the outbuildings and noticed through the windows, the yellow Blenheim in large pieces, various wings and fuselages, the cockpit of the Mk1 Blenheim looking quite advanced and the Hawker Hind.
The Hind obviously hasn’t been touched for a while, what’s it’s situation, I know it’s for sale, no takers I presume.
By: mike currill - 12th November 2007 at 12:58
Oh well that’s me well and truly wrong again (nothing new there then).:) The reason is I thought that they all had blister canpoies from the D onwards, didn’t know there were any razorback Gs
Thanks for clearing up my mis-understanding. A bit like the difference between a Mk IX Spitfire and a Mk XVI in that case then.
By: Norman D Lands - 6th November 2007 at 20:34
You know, that is one of the most amusing elements of fora such as these. There are people who frequent these fora, who are, not to overegg the pudding, some of the finest engineers around. It is largely thanks to their efforts that we have the opportunity to see some of the most magnificent aircraft in existence. Now, some of these members are, understandably and necessarily “in the know” and for some unknown reason they absolutely revel in flaunting that they know more than the average enthusiast. This is why James, you get crass answers to perfectly civil questions. It amuses them to think they can assume an air of superiority.
I’ve found it best not to question them because unless you are deemed to be of a similar status in life to them your question will be treated with contempt. The overwhelming air of superiority they assume may give them comfort and security, you know, rather like a child’s dummy.
In essence, most of the answers you will receive will be patronising, confusing, amusing and occasionally very enlightening or any or all of the above to some degree.
As for Legends? It is apparently not the done thing to speculate what will be there until after the event.
All joking aside, we really do owe them a huge vote of thanks for their efforts.
Regards,
kev35
Nothing wrong in replying in mono syllables.
By: Boghopper - 6th November 2007 at 20:04
Thought you’d agree.
And on another note, just to avoid double posting, was the Watch Office at Prees Heath?
Regards,
kev35
Affraid not, think of Norfolk
Martyn
By: DCK - 6th November 2007 at 19:42
Who cares?
Well, I do. 😮 😀
By: kev35 - 6th November 2007 at 19:42
Yep!!!!!
Thought you’d agree.
And on another note, just to avoid double posting, was the Watch Office at Prees Heath?
Regards,
kev35
By: Boghopper - 6th November 2007 at 19:38
kev35 You know, that is one of the most amusing elements of fora such as these. There are people who frequent these fora, who are, not to overegg the pudding, some of the finest engineers around. It is largely thanks to their efforts that we have the opportunity to see some of the most magnificent aircraft in existence. Now, some of these members are, understandably and necessarily “in the know” and for some unknown reason they absolutely revel in flaunting that they know more than the average enthusiast. This is why James, you get crass answers to perfectly civil questions. It amuses them to think they can assume an air of superiority.
I’ve found it best not to question them because unless you are deemed to be of a similar status in life to them your question will be treated with contempt. The overwhelming air of superiority they assume may give them comfort and security, you know, rather like a child’s dummy.
In essence, most of the answers you will receive will be patronising, confusing, amusing and occasionally very enlightening or any or all of the above to some degree.
Regards,
kev35
Yep!!!!!
By: kev35 - 6th November 2007 at 19:33
You know, that is one of the most amusing elements of fora such as these. There are people who frequent these fora, who are, not to overegg the pudding, some of the finest engineers around. It is largely thanks to their efforts that we have the opportunity to see some of the most magnificent aircraft in existence. Now, some of these members are, understandably and necessarily “in the know” and for some unknown reason they absolutely revel in flaunting that they know more than the average enthusiast. This is why James, you get crass answers to perfectly civil questions. It amuses them to think they can assume an air of superiority.
I’ve found it best not to question them because unless you are deemed to be of a similar status in life to them your question will be treated with contempt. The overwhelming air of superiority they assume may give them comfort and security, you know, rather like a child’s dummy.
In essence, most of the answers you will receive will be patronising, confusing, amusing and occasionally very enlightening or any or all of the above to some degree.
As for Legends? It is apparently not the done thing to speculate what will be there until after the event.
All joking aside, we really do owe them a huge vote of thanks for their efforts.
Regards,
kev35
By: DIGBY - 6th November 2007 at 18:56
Off topic but about theTFC
Will the TFC Gladiator be flying next year or around about Legends 08?
James
Who cares?
By: Manston Airport - 5th November 2007 at 22:54
Bit early to speculate about L*****s 2008 don’t you think??? Off with that mans head:D
Thank you 😀 what I mean is will it be flying around Legends 08 time? so June/July
James
By: spade grip - 5th November 2007 at 17:10
Bit early to speculate about L*****s 2008 don’t you think??? Off with that mans head:D
By: Manston Airport - 5th November 2007 at 15:10
Off topic but about theTFC
Will the TFC Gladiator be flying next year or around about Legends 08?
James
By: rossistb - 4th November 2007 at 19:29
Thanks for the help guys:)
By: markstringer - 4th November 2007 at 17:20
I would imagine its still at chino receiving some attention.
Whats the state of play on the fiat cr.42? Have all 4,8, 12 or how many wings returned to duxford yet?;)
By: Ant.H - 4th November 2007 at 15:58
Mike, your confusion is understandable. The G is basically an early D model (later D’s had the ‘bubbletop’), it’s just that it was built by Curtiss, hence the different letter. Likewise, the P51B and P51C are essentially the same, except that one was built at the plant in California and the latter were built at a plant in Texas.
So, a P47G is a Curtiss-built Razorback P47D.
By: mike currill - 4th November 2007 at 14:32
Oh well that’s me well and truly wrong again (nothing new there then).:) The reason is I thought that they all had blister canpoies from the D onwards, didn’t know there were any razorback Gs
By: Mark V - 4th November 2007 at 13:37
Really? I was under the impression it was a C not a G
Its a G model Mike.