April 18, 2004 at 11:57 pm
Some one has logged as Anna – I am on the phone to her!
Flood.
By: Mark9 - 20th April 2004 at 15:35
Thankyou so do I;) 😉 Anna;) 😀
By: duxfordhawk - 20th April 2004 at 00:27
Glad you are back Anna i hope the crap that has gone on has ended for good now.
By: Snapper - 20th April 2004 at 00:13
Howdy Anna.
By: Mark9 - 19th April 2004 at 22:42
Thanks for the support guys, XX Anna I would have never sent out that sort of rubbish:eek: Anna:eek: 😉 😉 Anna;) 🙂
By: Flood - 19th April 2004 at 20:46
She hopes to be here…today! (I Love Her!)
Flood.
By: EN830 - 19th April 2004 at 20:30
Hope to see Anna as herself here tonight,:D 😀 😀 🙂 🙂 🙂 😉 😉 😉 or at least this week.
By: Flood - 19th April 2004 at 20:28
Originally posted by NCLRULES
How would he get Anna’s password!?:rolleyes: :confused:
A lesson for us all – her password was very easy to guess. I don’t feel that Anna was deliberately targetted, just that she was the unlucky one on this occasion.
Flood.
By: plawolf - 19th April 2004 at 19:31
:confused:
maybe i didnt word myself properly, but i what i meant to say was that, i think kids aged 10 or thereabouts should not be allowed to post here (a bit irrelevent if this age 13 parent supervison thing is ture). but the minimum age limite should not be set as high as 18 or 20.;)
back on topic.
well this Skylinerworld has gotten what he deserved, so lets not get too caught up with it and move on.
anyone want to see a film?:)
By: A380!! - 19th April 2004 at 17:02
I strongly oppose against that proposal/view.
People under thirteen are already required to have parental permision beofre posting. Its innappropriate to have age eighteen as the min joining age permitted. That would lead to MANY pre-teens and teens being untruthful about their age. A dishonest forum is as good as no forum.
By: plawolf - 19th April 2004 at 16:59
well i was thinking more of 10 year olds when i said that (cos thats the age group i expected this kind of behaviour from) as opposed imposing an 18,20 minimum age.
By: Jeanske_SN - 19th April 2004 at 16:56
Plawolf, this certainly isn’t! I find it necessairy to have younger members on this forum. I have nothing against being banned of course. But why ban younger members from the forum if they also post useful stuff (I hope)?
By: A380!! - 19th April 2004 at 16:56
Originally posted by plawolf
if this isnt a reason to impose a minimum age limite, then nothing is! 😡well at least everything is sorted out.
I disagree. We have many teens here who give feedback in threads constructivley – green320, wannabe pilot just to name a remote amount. An age restiction would just narrow the variety of opinion we get here and make the forum rather dull.
By: plawolf - 19th April 2004 at 16:50
if this isnt a reason to impose a minimum age limite, then nothing is! 😡
well at least everything is sorted out.
By: A380!! - 19th April 2004 at 16:49
Whats happened? not another fiasco…is it true that Troll-linerworld has been banned?
By: duxfordhawk - 19th April 2004 at 15:56
Glad Webmaster has put a stop to this person and his sad acts.
This is a great forum and we should not let a few idiots ruin it.
By: LBARULES - 19th April 2004 at 15:37
Thank god… finally hes been banned. What a sick little boy.
By: EN830 - 19th April 2004 at 12:32
Originally posted by Flood
Got a message from the Webmaster – you can guess the result.Flood.
He’s taken the boy by the horns and banned him.
Hopefully his cohorts will be processed in the same manner.
Thank you to the Webmaster.
By: Flood - 19th April 2004 at 09:22
Got a message from the Webmaster – you can guess the result.
Flood.
By: Ashley - 19th April 2004 at 09:17
What an ***hole 😡
Sounds like a silly little boy who has got nothing better to do with his time…go off and play with your action figures whoever you are, and leave Anna and her friends alone.
By: Flood - 19th April 2004 at 09:13
Yes, I did…
Flood.