dark light

  • ZRX61

The Chino guys need your help now! Urgent!

Yanks Air Museum is suing to stop the airshow…

https://www.change.org/p/planes-of-fame-air-museum-don-t-let-them-stop-our-air-show

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

562

Send private message

By: CADman - 26th April 2017 at 07:25

I wonder how much this pointless exercise has cost both Yanks and PoF ?
The only winner being the Lawyers. 😡

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 26th April 2017 at 00:40

Yanks just dropped the injunction……

https://yanksair.org/2017-air-show-chino-airport-will-go-planned-benefit-attendees-vendors-aviation-community/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 21st April 2017 at 11:51

You can sign something just to show a spirit of feeling ,legal or otherwise or you can do nothing.I do think that opinions sometimes can sway a balance ,same as people get swayed by advertising.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,130

Send private message

By: Zac Yates - 21st April 2017 at 04:05

I agree J, it’s hard to understand how a court – any court, besides that of public opinion – would take into account a petition like this.

That being said, I work in the justice system and signed it anyway :p

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 21st April 2017 at 02:17

I’m curious to see what impact the signatures (especially those from people outside the jurisdiction) have on the case.

Really, it’s fun to get worked up and sign a petition with sincere righteousness indignation, but I don’t think it has any legal standing.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 21st April 2017 at 00:35

Signed.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 20th April 2017 at 19:45

from wix:

Update: 20 April 2017 –The hearing has been moved to 28 April due to the judge, that was scheduled to hear the case, has had some dealings with the airport and county. The request was made by Yanks Air Museum. It is also rumors that SOCAL MRO and Zangeneh Aeronautics has withdrawn from the case.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 20th April 2017 at 02:27

Hearing is tomorrow, petition now has over 15,000 signatures.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 12th April 2017 at 07:44

PoF has filed their response. It appears their lawyers know what they are doing…

https://secure-hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/2/b/2/2b2f365d599f7efa/Yanks_v_PoF_DS1705434_Docs_Filed_2017-04-07.pdf?c_id=14869597&expiration=1491980181&hwt=f7473cf125090a4de194bd2fa549bef6

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 6th April 2017 at 13:55

Signed

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

625

Send private message

By: jbs - 6th April 2017 at 13:53

A cheeky ‘bump’ to get this topic back to the top of the forum once more.

If you have yet to sign the online petition, link below, or have not yet sent an email of support to Planes of Fame ([EMAIL=”letusfly@planesoffame.org“]letusfly@planesoffame.org[/EMAIL]) please take a few moments out of your day to do so.

If you have already done so then you have my hearty thanks, but do please spread the word and encourage others to do the same.

https://www.change.org/p/planes-of-fame-air-museum-don-t-let-them-stop-our-air-show

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 3rd April 2017 at 13:28

To be fair you are quite correct.

The begging for money only comes up after you sign, and then they do make clear the money is for the website and won’t help the petition.

I was totally wrong / out of date. Apologies.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

192

Send private message

By: Nige - 2nd April 2017 at 14:19

Moggy

The petition and the lawsuit appear to be seperate things…

And there’s no ‘Donate’ button on the Change web page.
It’s simply a publicity driver set up by a ‘fan’…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 1st April 2017 at 22:25

It seems an odd effort to stop a lawsuit by a petition…which has no legal standing.

“Change.org” is an internet business

They host or create meaningless petitions and append a donate button that says something like “If you want to help our work putting a stop to the torturing of fluffy kittens you can donate here” (or whatever the petition is about)

The terminally naive seeing this donate a few quid or a dollars. Of course the total ‘work’ that change.org or 38degrees or the others do is to host petitions.

Stupid waste of time signing, stupid waste of money donating.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

684

Send private message

By: Rob68 - 1st April 2017 at 22:20

Did exactly the same as John, and on show day I drove in and out without issue. Nothing like Duxford Cosford Fairford etc

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

376

Send private message

By: JohnTerrell - 1st April 2017 at 20:16

Ironically, the only times I’ve ever been to Yanks is during the day or two prior to the Planes of Fame airshow, right within the 8 or 9 day span of time that they claim a lack of/prevention of business, and I’ve only ever been to Yanks because of traveling to Chino for the Planes of Fame airshow. Judging from what I’ve read on FB, many others just the same.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

321

Send private message

By: minimans - 1st April 2017 at 19:58

Sitting here typing this I have some sympathy for the tenants and business’s affected by the air show. I run a vintage restoration shop at Sonoma Raceway in the bay area of San Fransisco and have to close my shop for four event’s a year for a total of 12 days, plus severe disruption for the extra 8 days of setup and strike down time. for this period my customers lose all access to my business. The difference is when I signed my lease this was made quite clear and I signed in full knowledge of this. Perhaps if as sounds like the case at Chino this was not part of the lease agreement? Now I love Chino and am a regular visitor to the airport and museum, when I lived in SOCAL I was a paid member of Planes of Fame and even went for a flight in the Mustang. It sounds to me reading the complaint that personality problems have occurred that may well be unsolvable by the party’s involved and court is the only way to deal with it. I don’t think that they have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the law suit but maybe it will change things for the better for the plaintiffs because of it? It just seems such a shame that this has to be resolved in this manner and not by cooler minds in private. I have no affiliation with Yanks museum at all In fact I had a very poor experience there when they were first starting out! These opinions are based purely on a businessman’s take in not dissimilar circumstance. Mainly because this weekend is one of those weekends and I have a customer who wants to pick up his car and cannot!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

532

Send private message

By: me109g4 - 1st April 2017 at 19:03

Looks like the “internal” page at Flying pussies is turned off at this time for some mysterious reason,,,

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 1st April 2017 at 18:11

Reading through the compaint throws up several examples of outright fiction. They claim that airport tenants are caught up in traffic backed up for miles during the airshow. Truth is that the tenants get to use a separate gate & don’t face any traffic at all. I’ve used that gate during the show several times & there is absolutely no delay in getting into the airport. In fact it’s actually faster as they have a guy on the gate & it’s open when you get to it so you don’t have to stop to enter the code or RFID doodad at the sensor.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,675

Send private message

By: Sabrejet - 1st April 2017 at 15:56

I suppose the scanned document at Dropbox at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l6crfjlsutwqqtw/271299.pdf?dl=0
says it all.

Hard to believe the first few pages came from a serious attorney/legal professional. A lot of prejudicial and biased statements in there and a few typos too. On that basis alone I’d bet on it being thrown out. Let’s hope so. Not sure about the other businesses, but I’d think that Yanks will suffer some backlash.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply