December 28, 2017 at 10:51 am
This is what popped up on my FaceBook feed this morning. Made me smile, anyway.
Seeing as the Air Force One VC-25s are coming up to 30 years old, I’ve put it into Historical, but mods, feel free to move if necessary.
By: R4118 - 31st December 2017 at 05:55
I personally never was interested in the vulcan! Lightnings are alright but i prefer props so its the P38 lightning for me! They look better and sound a hell of a lot better in MY opinion!
By: Sabrejet - 29th December 2017 at 22:51
Oh you’re so right: those Vulcans on rapid reaction alert were soooo tedious and I just couldn’t get excited by the sight of a Lightning standing on its tail and going straight up.
By: R4118 - 29th December 2017 at 19:22
Well i can safely say i wouldnt be able to tell you what the hell it was! Anything after 1945 i start to lose interest
By: Sabrejet - 29th December 2017 at 17:27
It wasn’t Air Force 1: it was a Belgian AF A330.
By: TonyT - 29th December 2017 at 17:20
I’m confused: Air Force One is an A330?
What does that photo show exactly?
Airforce one is ANY aircraft the President is flying on, from Gulfstream to 747 to Cessna 152.
By: Scouse - 29th December 2017 at 14:17
And yet more in the same vein, plus, I suspect, a bit of Photoshoppery. Anyone want a job with History in Orbit as a professional aircraft recogniser?
By: Ian Hunt - 29th December 2017 at 09:53
Yep. Spitfire Mk 25.
By: John Green - 28th December 2017 at 20:45
The most recognisable aircraft in the world?
I plainly recognise it as a four engine, swept wing Spitfire – to do justice to the thread title it can be nothing else!
By: Arabella-Cox - 28th December 2017 at 18:10
Remember that some of the publicity photos may be taken while POTUS was not on board. I highly doubt 8 escort fighters would be that close- and that photo looks shopped perhaps?
The most infamous photo-op had the VC-25 low over new York city being chased by a F-16, much to the panic to some on the ground- whoever approved that photo-shoot was not thinking clearly.
By: Sabrejet - 28th December 2017 at 17:42
Found it – Belgian Air Force: photo taken at Koksijde airshow.
By: Scouse - 28th December 2017 at 16:51
I see they’ve finally got their act together, at least as far as identifying the aircraft. The spelling penny appears not to have dropped, yet, and the escorts still look a tad close,
By: J Boyle - 28th December 2017 at 16:06
Hampden98
I know the E-6 fleet (some of the last 707-320s built) had such an antenna arrangement for LF communications with ballistic missile submarines.
What’s the logo on the tail? It looks like a circle of stars.
Also, I’ve never seen the real AF1 with escorts that close.
The USAF has pretty strict rules on formation flying and I doubt if they’d be flying that close. In short, the danger of a midair is greater than some unknown or unsubstantiated threat.
A film perhaps?
By: Sabrejet - 28th December 2017 at 15:40
I’m confused: Air Force One is an A330?
What does that photo show exactly?
By: trumper - 28th December 2017 at 14:13
Is it the same security as secuirty :dev2:
By: hampden98 - 28th December 2017 at 13:58
I read somewhere that Airforce 1 has an aerial in the back that it can pay-out a bit like fishing line.
It’s 3 miles long and can transmit on ultra low frequencies, encrypted and in very small bursts.
So an hour of comms can be burst transmitted in a few seconds.
Not sure if that’s true though?
By: Arabella-Cox - 28th December 2017 at 13:54
I thought in these parts it was supposed to be …..”” THE SPITFIRE “” !!!!!
By: viscount - 28th December 2017 at 11:42
Surely that should be a suggestion to the Mods that they move it to the Hysterical section!
There are those on here who think that the aircraft knowledge of the ‘Daily Mail’ is weak, clearly the Americans are afflicted too.