dark light

  • SOC

The R-27 family

Due to some recent talk about this weapon, here’s what I have to offer…

R-27R-“short burn” SARH variant. Range 43 NM. NATO ASCC AA-10 ALAMO-A.
R-27T-s.b. IR variant. Range 37.8 NM. ALAMO-B.
R-27ER-“long burn” SARH variant. Range 70 NM. ALAMO-C.
R-27ET-l.b. IR variant. Range 64.75 NM. ALAMO-D.
R-27EA-l.b. AR variant. Range 70 NM. Not in service.
R-27EM-second l.b. SARH variant, designed for increased performance at low altitude, against targets such as sea-skimming cruise missiles. Destined for Su-33 if it ever enters service. Range 92 NM.
R-27P/EP-s.b./l.b. A-A ARMs. Rumored to be in service but still classified systems.

One of the Swedish praises of the -ER might be due to its range, which certainly outclasses the 30 NM figure given for AMRAAM, ramjet versions notwithstanding. It looks theoretically possible to engage a target at long enough range to get an impact and turn away well before coming into range of the AIM-120, or its seeker head if a launch was made.

The missile certainly seems capable on paper, but again no definitive combat information is available.

All variants can be carried by the Su-27 or derivatives, but only the short-burn variants can be carried on the basic MiG-29. The MiG-29S and subsequent variants are compatible with the long-burn variants due to improvements in the FCS. There was also the issue of the flaps having to be adjusted to not smack into the longer missiles rear fins.

No replies yet.
Sign in to post a reply