September 17, 2015 at 12:14 am
LINK – http://www.axis-and-allies-paintworks.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?11011
By: TempestV - 21st September 2015 at 10:19
Mosquito TT Mk39 nose glazing.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]240661[/ATTACH]
Yes, not pretty but it has a story to tell for the Fleet Air Arm training. I seem to recall there is another one of these flotating around in another UK museum. It would be good to see one of them built into a nose section for museum display. This could be a slice of wooden airframe forward of the pilots instrument panels.
Well done to Andrew for saving this.
By: Graham Boak - 21st September 2015 at 10:05
I think that the answer lies in the large number of optically perfect flat panes. This suggests a specification requiring accurate vision over a wide range of angles, rather than just one for a bombsight, so perhaps towing the target was only part of the intended duties of the type?
By: Supermarine305 - 20th September 2015 at 22:54
I am quite pleased that any part of TT.39 still survives let alone the most distinctive part.
But one thing does puzzle me? Why design such a complex nose with all the heavy framing and not just re-use the plexiglass nose like the Bomber variants had? Especially for a target tug where all the action should be happening behind it.
P.S. If the Peoples’ Mosquite ever does become a real thing, we have the first part right there.
By: H.M.S Vulture - 20th September 2015 at 22:09
Regardless of aesthetics each type has a story to tell, whether its air or ground crew related.
Very nice item Andrew.
Rob
Thanks.
By: Wyvernfan - 20th September 2015 at 12:58
Regardless of aesthetics each type has a story to tell, whether its air or ground crew related.
Very nice item Andrew.
Rob
By: Junk Collector - 20th September 2015 at 11:45
Gross
By: H.M.S Vulture - 20th September 2015 at 11:22
Mosquito TT Mk39 nose glazing.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]240661[/ATTACH]
By: Rosevidney1 - 20th September 2015 at 11:15
Worry not, Wyvernfan you are not entirely alone! For admirers of real ugliness in that period how about the Short’s Sturgeon?
By: Wyvernfan - 20th September 2015 at 11:01
Visually challenged it may be, but I find them fascinating.
Guess I’m on my own on that score!
Rob
By: Junk Collector - 20th September 2015 at 10:22
I was offered one of the nose glazings once, it was even uglier in real life
By: Flying_Pencil - 20th September 2015 at 00:26
You jest!
John
Dornier engineers successfully transplanted Do-317 nose to Mossy???
By: dhfan - 18th September 2015 at 00:48
No, it’s just ugly!
With three links or pictures in seven posts for the TT.39, (and one in agreement) we appear to have a runaway winner.
By: baj - 18th September 2015 at 00:25
John Aeroclub….that Mosquito is sooooo ugly its beautiful
By: John Aeroclub - 18th September 2015 at 00:15
You jest!

John
By: DC Page - 17th September 2015 at 04:47
This one looks like Bullwinkle.
http://1y2gm.foroactivo.com/t3026p10-reviendo-al-de-havilland-dh-98-mosquito
By: Zac Yates - 17th September 2015 at 04:22
My vote is definitely for the TT.39. The “bull-nose” variants are nasty, but nothing quite ruins the Mossie’s lines like that!
By: me109g4 - 17th September 2015 at 02:43
That is some serious ugly,, both pics.
By: dhfan - 17th September 2015 at 02:35
I disagree, the TT.39 was a fully-fledged eyesore.
There are a only few others readily found, fortunately, with a search but here’s one
http://1000aircraftphotos.com/Contributions/KleinBernhard/8581L.jpg