December 13, 2009 at 1:21 am
No, I’m not joking.
The world of warbirds just got a whole lot more up to date- Pride Aircraft’s first Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker, N131SU, was succesfully test flown on Dec 10th. Link below:
By: Rob Mears - 18th December 2009 at 00:15
Allow me to vent green….
uuugh. :rolleyes:
Trendy political projects are already vying for the demise of general aviation without warbird enthusiasts jumping on board. There is obviously no green purpose behind flying any warbird…so maybe they should all be grounded to save the human race from dying some hot horrible death? Methinks humanity is far too full of itself!
…or were you being facetious? 😀
By: WJ244 - 17th December 2009 at 18:11
However it is pronounced it is still an amazing acheivement to get this one back in the air but would anyone other than a modern military pilot ever be able to fly it.
If you had the money and inclination to buy a WW2 warbird like a Mustang or Spitfire it is possible, with the right approach and tuition, to work up from a PPL to the point where you can fly new pride and joy.
I appreciate that with a pilot with the appropriate experience on board an owner could go along for the ride in a SU-27 and may get a bit of stick time but, even assuming the owner had a bottomless pit of money for fuel, maintenance etc, I would have thought that graduating from a PPL to fly this unaided must be impossible.
I wouldn’t like to pick up the fuel, maintenance or insurance bills either!
By: AdlerTag - 17th December 2009 at 18:08
But it is preceded by ‘An’ rather than ‘A’…….
So it reads ‘An Ess-you’ rather than ‘A Soo’.
You can’t say ‘An Soo’ – at least not where I come from.
Anyway, its all a bit pedantic…….
Merry Christmas
Ken
Ah, very true Ken! Apologies. I must admit I have a habit of saying ‘Ess-You’, even if it is written correctly! You’ve found me out… 🙂
A Merry Christmas to you too!
By: Flanker_man - 17th December 2009 at 17:42
Hmmm I’d have thought ‘SU’ would have looked more like ‘Ess-You’. It’s typed as ‘Su’ in the title and first post…
But it is preceded by ‘An’ rather than ‘A’…….
So it reads ‘An Ess-you’ rather than ‘A Soo’.
You can’t say ‘An Soo’ – at least not where I come from.
Anyway, its all a bit pedantic…….
Merry Christmas
Ken
By: AdlerTag - 17th December 2009 at 15:26
Hmmm I’d have thought ‘SU’ would have looked more like ‘Ess-You’. It’s typed as ‘Su’ in the title and first post…
By: Oxcart - 16th December 2009 at 01:21
It’s in the thread title ‘The world’s latest warbird – an Su-27’
That reads ‘AN Ess-you 27′ rather than ‘A Soo-27’.
Sorry for being so anal …… it’s just a pet peeve.
Ken
Most of us have got pet peeves i expect -mine happens to be those aircraft models made out of mahogany:(!
By: Flanker_man - 15th December 2009 at 22:44
Am I missing something?- I’ve only ever seen it written as Su-er… from … Sukhoi
It’s in the thread title ‘The world’s latest warbird – an Su-27’
That reads ‘AN Ess-you 27′ rather than ‘A Soo-27’.
Sorry for being so anal …… it’s just a pet peeve.
Ken
By: Nashio966 - 15th December 2009 at 21:39
to be honest my friend, if you have the money to pay for it, i cant see the problem
By: J Boyle - 15th December 2009 at 21:34
Allow me to vent green….
Seems like a bloody waste of jet fuel…along with the Vulcan (sorry) and most business jet flights.
I don’t mind fuel being used for good reasons, but making noise and allowing minor celebrities the ability to fly without being bothered by “normal” people are silly.
By: Oxcart - 15th December 2009 at 21:09
Am I missing something?- I’ve only ever seen it written as Su-er… from … Sukhoi
By: Flanker_man - 15th December 2009 at 20:50
Can we please stop calling it ‘AN ESS-YOU 27’……. :confused:
It’s a SOO 27 – Su from the OKB creator’s last name – Pavel Osipovich Sukhoi
Soo khoi – Soo 27.
Back to the normal programme now…….
Ken
By: Flygirl - 15th December 2009 at 20:19
Any offers yet ??
By: Oxcart - 15th December 2009 at 19:25
I did a trouser shame:o
LOL!!-and some more LOL!!
By: AdlerTag - 15th December 2009 at 14:35
At the risk of going off-topic, does anyone remember that the MiG-29 that first appeared at Farnborough in 1988 was placarded in English? Anyone know why, apart from a Russian sense of humour? There was a theory going the rounds that the placarding was bog-standard Nato stuff, and had the Cold War had suddenly got hot the Russians could have rolled up at any Nato base and “persuaded” the local ground crews to do the necessaries. Or was that just paranoid gossip?
I’ve got a negative somewhere I’ll get scanned in.
This may have been a MiG-29S (Fulcrum-C) or an export -29SE, the English language cockpit being more marketable.
By: Scouse - 15th December 2009 at 13:07
The aircraft have been restored and relabeled (Russian placards don’t help English-reading pilots)
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/1532-full.html#201675
At the risk of going off-topic, does anyone remember that the MiG-29 that first appeared at Farnborough in 1988 was placarded in English? Anyone know why, apart from a Russian sense of humour? There was a theory going the rounds that the placarding was bog-standard Nato stuff, and had the Cold War had suddenly got hot the Russians could have rolled up at any Nato base and “persuaded” the local ground crews to do the necessaries. Or was that just paranoid gossip?
I’ve got a negative somewhere I’ll get scanned in.
By: pagen01 - 15th December 2009 at 13:02
Purely for arguments sake, what is to prevent a millionaire in this country from buying and operating an Su-27 here?
I’m assuming that the type is still heavily supported by manufacturers Sukhoi, so the example is very different to true warbird types such as Lightnings etc.
And no, I haven’t won the Euromillions!
By: lotus72 - 15th December 2009 at 12:54
FAB!
By: Merlin Madness - 15th December 2009 at 01:53
I did a trouser shame:o
By: minimans - 15th December 2009 at 01:37
A Hair under 5 million is what there asking!! Cheap if you ask me but then I don’t have the dosh or the sphere’s to fly it anyway!!
By: Flygirl - 14th December 2009 at 09:13