dark light

Things under aircraft

Ok just for a laugh. What is it? What’s it under? and most importantly Why?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

147

Send private message

By: Aeronut - 12th June 2007 at 22:02

The ‘Upturned brolley’ is the crash pan, designed to absorbe the shock of landing by deforming. The supply containers had a similar device called a crash head on one end. 50 years later the motor industry ‘invented’ crumple zones that use the same idea. Talking of the motor industry the crash pan was replaced by air bags in the early 1950s long before they appeared on cars.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,010

Send private message

By: pogno - 12th June 2007 at 20:51

So we have the answer, but why have an upturned brolly underneath the gun, was it to catch something, hide something or is it not a brolly.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

147

Send private message

By: Aeronut - 12th June 2007 at 16:42

The inability of the Wellington to carry enough ammunition (onions or otherwise) was one reason why the idea wasn’t taken any further. Another was the fact that the parachute bags left in the bomb bay would strike the aircarft so hard that the wooden stringers on the fuselarge would be broken.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,986

Send private message

By: stuart gowans - 12th June 2007 at 15:39

No sign of mr Hodges onions though…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

147

Send private message

By: Aeronut - 12th June 2007 at 15:25

We have the answer.
Wellington MkIII with the 4000 lb cookie bomb bay.
The Smith Gun with one wheel removed and stowed side on, also no evidence of the gun shield – no doubt removed to save weight.
Photgraph is from the Airborne Forces Experimental Establishment Report P66 published in May 43. At this time the Airborne Forces were trying anything as for the Smith Gun sense prevailed and it was handed down to the Home Guard, although a picture of a crashed Hamilcar at Tarrent Rushton shows a number stored around the building the Hamilcar landed on!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

566

Send private message

By: CSheppardholedi - 12th June 2007 at 14:09

Definatley Smith Gun. Now for the questions unanswered, what bomber (now we have a sence of scale), and what is a home defense (questionable artillary piece) doing in a bomb bay? Potential firepower for airbourne troops? Better than the Piat?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 12th June 2007 at 13:58

It’s a ‘Smith Gun’!!!

That’s it. Good pic link. The Smith Gun was next to the Davis recoiless guns in the Purnell ‘Allied Secret Weapons’ (i.e. odd things we din’t use…)

Corking quiz.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,010

Send private message

By: pogno - 12th June 2007 at 13:36

Could it be the inflight refueling hose drum unit on a Harrow, it looks too light a structure to be a target/glider winch, or possibly a trailing aerial drum.
Is that a upturned brolly at the bottom of the picture, to catch spilt fuel perhaps.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 12th June 2007 at 13:35

It’s a ‘Smith Gun’!!!

I knew I’d seen that ‘wheel’ arrangement somewhere before!

For towing it has two cone shaped wheels (one detached at the side in the picture) but for firing it was tipped on its side and used the lower wheel as a turntable.

The curved gun-shield the spanned the gap between the wheels is missing though (which would have made identification much easier).

Very ‘Home Guard’, in fact I think the first time I ever saw one was during an episode of ‘Dads Army’!

There is a good photo here:

http://www.national-army-museum.ac.uk/exhibitions/shortVisits/iconic/page17.shtml

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 12th June 2007 at 13:31

Could it be a Wellington?

It’s big with a big ‘bomb-bay’, no geodetics but the nose ladder looks right.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

596

Send private message

By: steve_p - 12th June 2007 at 13:04

Either the tail is propped up or its got a nosewheel. I’ll go for an Albemarle.

Best wishes
Steve P

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

147

Send private message

By: Aeronut - 12th June 2007 at 11:25

Not Whitley. Muzzle does have a towing ring.
Possible weapon for Airborne Forces – Spot on

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 12th June 2007 at 11:10

I saw the prop blade in the photo so realised the ‘weapon’ is pointing backwards.

Clearly this thing is rigged for transport not firing so possibly intended to support airborne forces.

Maybe a lightweight ‘recoilless’ piece of artillery?

Aircraft, possibly Whitley?

I reckon CDs the closest. I vaguely recall a recoiless type gun with a muzzle with the towing lanyard, but the memory’s a bit fuzzy. It also could be a mortar with the baseplate. Given the absence of any visible rifling, that’s my bid…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

386

Send private message

By: JagRigger - 12th June 2007 at 10:40

The round bit looks like a winch to me.

I know there were trials at various times of trailing weapons, and the ‘barrel’ could be a feed tube for the wire…………..

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 12th June 2007 at 09:55

Crude Anti-Tank Gun

I saw the prop blade in the photo so realised the ‘weapon’ is pointing backwards.

Clearly this thing is rigged for transport not firing so possibly intended to support airborne forces.

Maybe a lightweight ‘recoilless’ piece of artillery?

Aircraft, possibly Whitley?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 12th June 2007 at 09:11

Bristol Beaufort

Smoke (chemical) device?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,986

Send private message

By: stuart gowans - 12th June 2007 at 08:58

Whatever it is we are looking at the back of it ,you can see a prop blade up front to the right, and what looks like a crew access ladder behind the, er, device?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

147

Send private message

By: Aeronut - 12th June 2007 at 08:49

Not a Beau but the right country.
‘Crude Anti-tank gun’ Close but no cigar.
Hint (of little help) The photo was taken in 1942.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

252

Send private message

By: Kenbo - 12th June 2007 at 01:04

I like the ‘Beau’ idea too, but, the ‘Beau’ also had the ‘double-ended’ door attached to the ladder – half of which would be visible here.

True… door could be off due to the ‘mods’ on the underside tho…….
Some-one put us out of our misery and tell us what it is…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,053

Send private message

By: contrailjj - 12th June 2007 at 00:55

I like the ‘Beau’ idea too, but, the ‘Beau’ also had the ‘double-ended’ door attached to the ladder – half of which would be visible here.

this looks almost like it might have been designed to be retractable, but not with those sway braces…

1 2
Sign in to post a reply