By: wysiwyg - 26th May 2004 at 00:55
Everyone’s welcome to their own views but I think Monarch is a VERY good airline and would have been delighted to have worked for them.
By: SkyHIGH - 25th May 2004 at 23:32
TCX aren’t the only airline that fly to Cayo Coco, a number of airlines including Air Canada offer services there as does Cubana.
By: by738 - 25th May 2004 at 22:46
Why do you say that ? ( x3 )
http://www.carsurvey.org/air/review_1975.html
http://www.carsurvey.org/air/review_7801.html
Some people on long haul seem to like them 😉
By: topjet330 - 25th May 2004 at 21:43
monarch are much worse than thomas cook to start with
By: topjet330 - 25th May 2004 at 21:43
monarch are much worse than thomas cook to start with
By: topjet330 - 25th May 2004 at 21:42
monarch are much worse than thomas cook to start with
By: by738 - 25th May 2004 at 21:03
http://www.flymonarch.com/chartered/wherewefly/index.asp?r=1&cg=2
And Gatwick ! 😉
By: topjet330 - 24th May 2004 at 21:31
only from glasgow
By: by738 - 24th May 2004 at 21:05
Monarch fly there too.
By: T5 - 24th May 2004 at 20:52
Of course. I wasn’t suggesting that you even try searching for an alternative airline. It’s just that package holidays are extremely overpriced as it is, and charter airlines see it fit to add about £300 (??) on top of the price to treat you like any other airline would anyway.
By: topjet330 - 24th May 2004 at 20:28
but theres not much option with cayo coco, there is only thomas cook who fly there
By: T5 - 24th May 2004 at 20:06
It may sound a bit rude, but you’re paying the extra to get service that real airlines offer you anyway.
Rather than getting a few centimetres of legroom, you get what most airlines offer anyway.
Free drinks, again, are included in the price with other airlines.
etc etc
By: topjet330 - 24th May 2004 at 17:35
the thomas cook brochure says extra leg room, and wider seats, and i hope they offer more than this
Sign In
May 24, 2004 at 4:10 pm