dark light

Time to renovate some Shackletons ?

At a time when we’ve just been told that the search for the four missing yachtsmen in the North Atlantic has been called off, it is worth reminding ourselves that we donate around ten billion a year to foreign aid and yet can’t afford one single, properly equipped maritime patrol aircraft to assist the search.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 28th May 2014 at 17:37

That being said, there will be countless future situations where a Nimrod would be invaluable.Just need to farm out RAF SAR now and that’s just about the final nail in the coffin.

It’s already happening or hadn’t you heard? It’s been ongoing for 12 – 18 months now.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 28th May 2014 at 17:36

Actually, I thought there was nothing wrong with the 1950s airframe…

…it was the ‘systems’ that caused all the problems.

The thing that really shocked me about the search for the missing yacht crew was that once the search aircraft were in the approximate area of the Atlantic Ocean the ‘search’ seemed to consist entirely of the crew looking out of the windows!

Funny that’s the take I got on the demise of the MR4.
I guess that the looking out of the window would be because een with a radar reflector a yacht made of composite materials would be hard to pick out from surface clutter giving spurious returns

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 28th May 2014 at 17:08

all of the equipment in the Nimrod R1s must have still been in good nick?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,085

Send private message

By: John Green - 28th May 2014 at 12:47

Re 19

I’m sure that there is a variety of locator beacon that can be attached to a floating vessel and when that vessel sinks is automatically detached and broadcasts on 121.5 and 406 MHz. I believe that submarines are so equipped. The beacon is fitted with a drogue to slow down drift.

I haven’t heard of them attached to aircraft.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

373

Send private message

By: GrahamF - 27th May 2014 at 20:02

No, the only thought that has occurred to me is only if I could come up with a device that sends out a distress call, can still do it in great depths of water and doesn’t run out of battery just before possible rescue/or finding of ones mortal remains.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

178

Send private message

By: Sealand Tower - 27th May 2014 at 19:36

Of course the stylish way to go with maritime reconnaissance is the Kawasaki PX !

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,414

Send private message

By: mmitch - 27th May 2014 at 19:18

Or we could buy an airframe which is still in production after 60 years. LM are pushing it under the MODs nose.
The Canadians and US Coast Guard use them..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtGM9ldHcgM
mmitch.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 27th May 2014 at 18:57

My thinking is that the RJ was still in production. Modification would have been far easier than the redesign of an aircraft that was already a redesign of a Comet. Couple that with a wide fuselage that is far more accomodating and you have an aircraft that is exportable and affordable.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

790

Send private message

By: VX927 - 27th May 2014 at 12:45

New build would have been using an airframe design that was still 1950’s in its origin ! There was nothing wrong with the systems -it needed to go in a new design airframe or something that was a littler newer – the AVRO RJ for example !

I’m interested to know why the Avro RJ would have made a better platform than new build Nimrods? What is your thinking behind that? (seriuous question)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

702

Send private message

By: ErrolC - 27th May 2014 at 11:50

During the MH370 search, the primary difference between the MPAs and the bizjets with trained civvy volunteers appeared to be that the MPAs had the optics to evaluate possible ‘raw’ debris sightings more quickly and easily. If you have a expected search target with a detectable radar reflection, the approach changes somewhat.

Note that the oldest airframes in the MH370 Indian Ocean search (the RNZAF Orions from the early 1960’s) had some of the best equipment, having received two major avionics updates (the second having just being completed).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

86

Send private message

By: sCOTT bROOKES - 27th May 2014 at 11:37

That being said, there will be countless future situations where a Nimrod would be invaluable.Just need to farm out RAF SAR now and that’s just about the final nail in the coffin.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,720

Send private message

By: D1566 - 27th May 2014 at 09:43

The thing that really shocked me about the search for the missing yacht crew was that once the search aircraft were in the approximate area of the Atlantic Ocean the ‘search’ seemed to consist entirely of the crew looking out of the windows!

I guess that if there are no locator beacons working, then there is not much else you can do?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 27th May 2014 at 09:14

Actually, I thought there was nothing wrong with the 1950s airframe…

…it was the ‘systems’ that caused all the problems.

The thing that really shocked me about the search for the missing yacht crew was that once the search aircraft were in the approximate area of the Atlantic Ocean the ‘search’ seemed to consist entirely of the crew looking out of the windows!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 27th May 2014 at 00:49

New build would have been using an airframe design that was still 1950’s in its origin ! There was nothing wrong with the systems -it needed to go in a new design airframe or something that was a littler newer – the AVRO RJ for example !

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,163

Send private message

By: benyboy - 27th May 2014 at 00:05

New build MRA4, like it should have been in the first place would be better.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

32

Send private message

By: spadegrip - 26th May 2014 at 23:46

Another US aircraft when we cancel our own then shut the flaming factory (Woodford) We haven’t come very far since the TSR2 debacle have we ? Take an envious look at the US aerospace industry.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 26th May 2014 at 18:43

In fairness without recovering the boat the chain of events is speculation regarding the boat loss . I believe a P.8 will be at Waddington and Farnborough -I forsee RAF examples in the near future.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,800

Send private message

By: Oxcart - 26th May 2014 at 18:36

From what I’ve see and read, those people didn’t last long at all. Even a supersonic search plane wouldn’t have helped. R.I.P.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 26th May 2014 at 17:43

Those Nimrods they scrapped with undue haste would have done nicely.

Anon.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 26th May 2014 at 17:40

How are the two Shackletons in Cyprus? 😀

1 2
Sign in to post a reply