dark light

  • Moggy C

Tricky landing / take off?

Posted elsewhere by my chum ‘African Eagle’

http://www.havasreti.com/images/goose.wmv

No comment really necessary from me.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

457

Send private message

By: Chad Veich - 3rd January 2006 at 22:36

Hmmm, maybe this is not THE “Hoot” Gibson but just a “Hoot” Gibson. I must have skimmed over the part about Costa Rica without really reading it. Had THE “Hoot” Gibson had his license pulled we probably would have heard more about it on this board and others come to think of it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

843

Send private message

By: Kenneth - 3rd January 2006 at 20:57

“Hoot” Gibson, who had spent several years obtaining his commercial license in Costa Rica.

I shouldn’t think the “Hoot” Gibson did so or ever needed to…

Otherwise, I agree 100% with JDK’s opinion.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

543

Send private message

By: Eric Mc - 2nd January 2006 at 22:17

I thought it might be him too – although I think “Hoot” is a common prefix for chaps called Gibson in the US (a bit like “Nobby” Clarke in the UK).

I would like to think it was a different Hoot Gibson really – as the NASA one is a well respected test and Shuttle pilot.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

457

Send private message

By: Chad Veich - 2nd January 2006 at 21:47

Well, unless there is another I’m unaware of it would be this one:
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/gibson.html

Combat pilot, shuttle commander, and pilot of 3350 powered racing Fury “Riff Raff” among many other credits.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

373

Send private message

By: willy.henderick - 2nd January 2006 at 20:47

Would you please tell us who is “Hoot” Gibson?

Thks in advance

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

457

Send private message

By: Chad Veich - 2nd January 2006 at 04:08

[QUOTE=Roger Cain]As a result, Gibson’s license, obtained over several years, was withdrawn after one brief flight. [QUOTE]

That’s funny. Obviously the reporter who wrote this is unaware of just who “Hoot” Gibson is!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

805

Send private message

By: markstringer - 1st January 2006 at 17:53

i know accidents happen but that looked remarkbly clumsey to say the least.
as delboy would say, what a plonker.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1

Send private message

By: Roger Cain - 31st December 2005 at 20:16

Here’s the whole story on the Goose incident, from www.supercub.org

Rather long account of what happened to cause the accident and it’s outcome.

WILD GOOSE
Back in the “olden days”, when Tamarindo was a small village and everyone knew everyone else, filmmaker Bruce Brown chose the town to shoot a segment for his new movie “Endless Summer II”. The sequel to the famous surfing movie “Endless Summer” came a generation later than the original, and, of course, featured new stars: Wingnut and Pat O’Connor, together with one of the originals, Robert August.

Living in Flamingo at that time was a pilot, “Hoot” Gibson, who had spent several years obtaining his commercial license in Costa Rica. Hoot owned a vintage Grumman Goose seaplane, relic of World War II, and intended to charter it for tours. Given the state of the roads then – and not much improved since – a seaplane seemed the way to go to explore a country surrounded by sea.

Robert August had a fine idea: To charter the Goose to fly the film crew and its surfers around the coasts of Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Panama, looking for unknown or little-known surf spots to shoot their sequences. Apart from being much faster to cover more area, the aircraft was highly superior to a boat, which could only examine the waves from the “back”, or ocean, side whereas a ‘plane could approach from the landward side, too. “Endless Summer II” was Hoot’s first charter in Costa Rica, and was to last two weeks.

On the first day, the Goose took off from the airport. The plan was to fly out to Cabo Velas, return along Playa Grande and land in the bay near Tamarindo estuary, where the crew would board, then to take off on their adventures.

The camera crew set up on Tamarindo Beach, ready to shoot the approach and landing for the movie. But instead of flying from Cabo Velas, approaching Tamarindo from the west along the Playa Grande coastline, the big Grumman twin came roaring down the river from the north, putting on a show for the camera. On board were the pilot, “Hoot” Gibson, and local resident and California board shaper, the late Mike “Doc” Diffenderfer.

Approaching Tamarindo, the pilot started a right turn to follow the estuary, but his height was insufficient. Presumably he suddenly became aware of the power lines which cross the river at that point, and was forced to fly below them. The right pontoon caught the water, and jerked the aircraft to the right. Overcorrecting, the pilot put the left float into the water, and the aircraft swerved to that side.

Gibson applied full take-off power to get the aircraft back into the air, but it careered from the river onto the beach, where it ground-looped and came to a stop. The whole incident was filmed, and eventually became part of the movie.

“At this point,” said August, “we saw fuel spraying from the aircraft onto the sand, and there was a distinct danger of a fire or explosion. As we approached the ‘plane, the doors opened and Hoot and Doc jumped out, fortunately both unhurt. From a nearby beach house, a resident came running, carrying a big club and shouting at the pilot that he was in a national park, and polluting the beach. We managed to calm him down, and the incident ended at that point.”

Eyewitness Dean Butterfield adds: “I was up the hill looking over the estuary, watching Hoot Gibson fly the plane through it. He was doing touch and go’s in the estuary, I was wondering why he felt he had to do that in there. As he came out to the mouth I think he saw the cable stretched across at the last minute and tried to duck under it. He caught the wing tip and stuffed it into the sand.

By the time I got down to it, there were a lot of people around. I took pictures and made a T-shirt from one.”

Officials of Minae also attended the site very shortly after the accident, and charged the pilot with flying in a protected zone (Parque Marina las Baulas). As a result, Gibson’s license, obtained over several years, was withdrawn after one brief flight.

“As it happened, the club-bearing resident did quite well out of the crash.” August continues. “The plane suffered damage to a wing and one of the propellers, and parts for a vintage seaplane are not procured at your local NAPA store, so the aircraft had to sit for a year or so while repairs were made. During this time the aircraft was parked in the resident’s back garden, he and his family being paid for caretaker duty against theft or vandalism. I believe someone of the family slept in their garden ornament every night.”

The day after the accident, filming continued with a scene where supposed crash passengers August, Wingnut and Pat O’Connor climb cheerfully from the Goose, carrying their boards, and run off to the surf.

Seriously concerned that accident investigators or other officials might confiscate the film shot up to that point, Director Bruce Brown hired a friend to hop a Sansa flight to San José, thence to Los Angeles for processing. Fortunately, the film escaped customs examination but, arriving in Los Angeles, it was delayed a couple of days en route for the processing studio by the Rodney King riots, which occurred in the vicinity of the studio.

The Goose was eventually repaired and flown out of Tamarindo.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 31st December 2005 at 16:30

Is that from Bela Havrasreti Moggy? SNJ rebuild in the states? Nice chap -lovely project…?

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 31st December 2005 at 11:24

Ow.

No way to treat a rare and valuable vintage aircraft.

I’d guess there’s a lot less Grumman Gooses flying than there are this forum’s beloved Spitfire – I don’t think the responses here would be so relaxed if it was a Spitfire’s groundloop we were being shown.

Awful.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 31st December 2005 at 10:21

Judging by the attitude of the people on the beach it must be a normal common occurance,”oh look,theres another one LOL”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,541

Send private message

By: Rlangham - 30th December 2005 at 17:22

Whoa crikey, can’t believe the people on the beach though!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,381

Send private message

By: Bradburger - 30th December 2005 at 16:19

Oooo, now that looked rather expensive! 😮

Cheers

Paul

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,847

Send private message

By: Dave Homewood - 30th December 2005 at 13:09

Lummy, looks like Lt. Phillips from the Navy Lark must have been at the helm!

Actually looked a lot like the Kiwi sport of jet sprint racing, except we do that in boats!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

797

Send private message

By: Lamps - 30th December 2005 at 13:08

😮 an expensive mishap. Those people on the beach certainly did not turn an eye 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 30th December 2005 at 12:47

You using Windows Media Player?

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,604

Send private message

By: Pete Truman - 30th December 2005 at 12:42

OK, so why won’t it run on my computer, broadband and all.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 30th December 2005 at 12:41

Bloody hell! 😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 30th December 2005 at 12:33

Hmm, more likely a take-off indeed. Thread title edited 🙂

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,048

Send private message

By: wessex boy - 30th December 2005 at 12:16

That’s one way to abort a take-off!

I love the nonchalence of (some of) the people standing around!

1 2
Sign in to post a reply