January 27, 2004 at 1:43 am
Hello chaps,
I was just wondering why modern restorations of warbirds don’t seem to ever have tropical filters fitted. Is this purely because it might restrict there operation under non-tropic/desert conditions or some thing else?
An example of this would be TFC’s newly restored Mk.IV Hurricane which technically should have a volkes (sp?) filter fitted. Am i right?
Can anyone shed any light on this?
TIA
By: Yak 11 Fan - 31st January 2004 at 23:48
Originally posted by DazDaMan
Has the Hurricane gone back yet?
Yep, the Hurricane left the UK during late July / early August 2002. It was a lovely looking aircraft when once it was finished, way better than what they sent over.
By: Dan Johnson - 31st January 2004 at 18:50
Earlier photo of EE853 that I got from 79 Squadron pilot Hugh Kennare, back in the mid 80s. He’d flown with Barney Newman who had been a Spit XII pilot with 41 Squadron before joining 79 where he was killed flying VIIIs in August 45. Hugh also knew Don Smith who’d flown XIIs with 41.
Note the tropical filter under the nose, not yet attached. And Mark12, the pilot of MB882 in your avatar is standing to that left behind the right wing. That’s Don Smith.
Now if at some time I could have a Spitfire in my back yard like Langdon Badger did 🙂
Dan
By: DazDaMan - 31st January 2004 at 15:35
That picture is a bit old, I think. Has the Hurricane gone back yet? If so, the Spit would probably have been repainted by now.
By: Warhawk - 31st January 2004 at 13:59
Yes, I realize that. I was hoping that by putting up the link that it would clear up the situation a little bit. However it seems that I’ve muddied up the waters even more. Pardon me while I go shoot myself.:( 😉
By: Mark12 - 31st January 2004 at 08:52
Warhawk,
This suggests that it is still in the Eagle Squadron livery.
Mark
By: Warhawk - 31st January 2004 at 01:21
Yup, I gotcha. I went back and sure enough they have two Spits in the USAF museum. Now that everyone has looked at the wrong page, try this one:
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/early_years/ey24.htm
Does that look a little better everyone?
By: Ant.H - 31st January 2004 at 01:09
I think you’ve got the wrong Spit there Warhawk,the one you mention is a PR.XI (11),an unarmed Photo Recce model.The aircraft in question here is a Mk.V (5) fighter.
By: Warhawk - 31st January 2004 at 01:03
Originally posted by Mark12
Quote from Daz:
—————————————————————————–
‘Spitfire Vc MA863, currently residing in the USAF museum, and now repainted in a USAAF colour scheme…’
—————————————————————————–Can anybody please support this with a photo?
Mark
According to the USAF museum website it has been painted to represent an aircraft from the 14th photographic squadron based at mount farm. There is a picture with the text at:
By: jbs - 30th January 2004 at 22:29
Mark,
I thought she was still in Eagle sqn markings
Could be wrong though
By: Mark12 - 30th January 2004 at 22:06
Quote from Daz:
—————————————————————————–
‘Spitfire Vc MA863, currently residing in the USAF museum, and now repainted in a USAAF colour scheme…’
—————————————————————————–
Can anybody please support this with a photo?
Mark
By: jbs - 30th January 2004 at 20:06
Mark,
By all means 😉
By: Mark12 - 30th January 2004 at 19:55
JBS
May I………..?
Here is a shot of MH592 taken at Belgrade on 19 March 1990.
There is a lot of controversy over the identity of this Mk V.
On the basis that the ‘new’ museum register of 1961 listed this aircraft as ‘9489’ of the Yugoslav Air Force it was duly restored in the late 1980’s and repainted as ‘JK808/B’. All fairly reasonable considering the aircraft was for many years without any serial at all and latterly painted as ‘JK448/W’.
Period photos however at the museum storage facility at Kalamagdon Park taken in April 1961 clearly show the original military serial as 9486 and for me that will make it MH592.
I have suggested a simple transcription error was made in the register. The Yugoslavs however suggest a mispaint of the military serial in the 1950’s. :rolleyes:
Mark
By: jbs - 27th January 2004 at 12:35
The Mk.Vc Spitfire MH592 at the Yugoslav Aeronautical Museum in Belgrade has a Vokes filter fitted
I have a picture, but its not mine so I can’t post it
By: DazDaMan - 27th January 2004 at 12:07
EE853 (J Burford photo)
By: david brown - 27th January 2004 at 11:49
What about the Spit Vc at the South Australia Aircraft Museum and the Hurricane on display in Belgrade a few years ago?
By: Firebird - 27th January 2004 at 10:51
The one exception to this must have been Black-6, as didn’t the team refit the trop filter to her part way through her display life. I seem to remember it was fabricated using the original trop filter from the SAAF Museum 109F Trop. as a pattern…?
And hasn’t he SAAF Museum Hurricane got a trop filter on it as well…???
By: DazDaMan - 27th January 2004 at 09:00
Spitfire Vc MA863, currently residing in the USAF museum, and now repainted in a USAAF colour scheme (it wore Eagle Squadron markings while the Hurricane was over here being restored).
(photo: Dean Alexander)
By: Jagan - 27th January 2004 at 08:14
Do any of the static Hurricanes or Spitfires have the Volks filter?
By: mike currill - 27th January 2004 at 07:37
May mean a restoration not being totally correct historically speaking but a sensible enough decision to my way of thinking
By: Mark V - 27th January 2004 at 03:54
Re: Tropical filters ommited – why?
Originally posted by Chris Broad
Hello chaps,
I was just wondering why modern restorations of warbirds don’t seem to ever have tropical filters fitted.
TIA
Very simple – its because they are very ugly and do nothing for performance. Coupled with the fact that they would have to be specially fabricated means that they are just never done.
These factors have overuled the historic accuracy factor.