dark light

  • Cking

U.S. Sea Harrier up date

Seem like the Americans are getting close to having their Sea Harrier in the sky

http://www.nallsaviation.com/

Good luck to them. I bet the paperwork mountain for this is impressive!

Rgds Cking

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,360

Send private message

By: Bager1968 - 27th July 2007 at 01:04

“We located a repair facility in North Carolina “

MCAS Cherry Point?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

448

Send private message

By: Vulcan903 - 26th July 2007 at 20:30

If it’s anything like normal America just pull up in your pick-up and watch to your heart’s content!

Agreed! I watch the RAF Odiham Family Day yesterday from a small country pub south of the airfield.
I got the whole pub out into the car park in rain to watch the flat display – even the owners left the pub and my mate looked after the place!

The RA ‘s were turning over us, which was nice, but at the end en route on the circuit Red 5, headed straight for us in the car park, bast of smoke as he went past and a wing wave.

Made us very proud!
See … it still can be done!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 26th July 2007 at 20:23

If it’s anything like normal America just pull up in your pick-up and watch to your heart’s content!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

448

Send private message

By: Vulcan903 - 26th July 2007 at 20:20

Ouch.

Art can certainly write in an entertaining fashion though!

Yes Damien, I though it amusing considering the setbacks. Nice to see a team on a worth while project with a sence of humour.

Wonder if the first flight will be a non public event or maybe it will be down to a $50 raffle;)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 26th July 2007 at 20:03

You certainly need humour or humor to operate:D an antique (?) plane!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 26th July 2007 at 19:58

There should be quite a few bits of GTS lying around in the U.K . From memory it uses the same GTS as a GR.3 . I would be interested to know how well the water pressure tests went on the reaction system.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

448

Send private message

By: Vulcan903 - 26th July 2007 at 16:40

It caught on fire!

Just had this from Art:

This really is UPDATE 12. All of the previous Updates are posted on our website, in chronological order. Apparently, my math leaves something to be desired and a college education hasn’t helped.

For the past six months, we’ve been two weeks away from flying. Two weekends ago, we made up one of those weeks. Last weekend, we lost a couple of weeks. If anyone can do the math for me and tell me where we are, please do. My best guess is we don’t exactly know where we are.

First, the good news: Two weekends ago we convened a quorum of Marines, our usual volunteers, an avionics guru, our dedicated maintainers, cooks and dishwashers and worked straight through the weekend. All anticipated supplies were on hand. We attempted to do a marathon work session and take the SHAR as far as possible. We accomplished quite a bit.

The radio installation is now complete. The GPS is installed and works – we know EXACTLY where the airplane is positioned on the ground. The pitot-static system is nearly complete, a camera system has been developed and nearly complete, new circuit breakers and wiring installed to support all this new equipment and new antennae located and installed. None of this was easy. To further complicate matters, we even installed an intercom (in a single-seat jet???) to the port wing tip so the pilot can communicate directly with the ground crew for post-start checks, etc. Actually, the intercom was part of the original Sea Harrier design. We just tapped into existing wiring for civilian communications and it works just fine. It even has active noise cancellation incorporated, which is good and bad. More on that later. Except for a very small punch-out list, by the end of the weekend, we were again ready to run the engine. But, we ran out of weekend and people had to return to their day jobs.

The following weekend, our intentions were to service all the systems, fuel the airplane and continue with ground runs. With a much smaller crew, we intended to do functional checks on all the systems, ensure that we have top-end RPM’s, time the engine accelerations and verify that alternating current is now generating. We had a significant test card to accomplish, but were continuing to take all this systematically, one step at a time, ad seriatum. Just when it looked like we were making significant progress, all Hell broke loose.

Now the bad news: On start up, the Gas Turbine Starter (GTS) initially performed as advertised. The engine start, temperatures and RPM’s were completely normal. I then noticed some degree of concern on the faces of the expert ground crew. I quickly determined this look of concern was completely justified because the airplane was on fire.

Sometime late in the start cycle, the GTS made a loud “pop” and spit a handful of turbine blades through its exhaust port all over the ramp, followed shortly by a large , orange flame. Quite dramatic, I assure you. This was all completely unnoticed by me, since the active noise cancellation was actually working pretty well. Hurray for modern technology – – but, I could have been a toasted biscuit and not known it. Anyway, the expert ground crew gave me the universally-accepted signal for FIRE by running frantically in various directions, giving the appearance of disorganization. It’s amazing how universally-accepted this signal really is. Ray Charles could have understood it. Fortunately, we had just procured an extremely large, one-each, fire extinguisher that was positioned adjacent to the airplane. The GTS, engine, batteries, cockpit, and FIRE were all secured in a matter of seconds, and the the SHAR looked like it was covered in snow. No visible damage, beyond the small handful of turbine blades litering the ramp. Visual inspection indicated the GTS will need some serious orthodonture…..

Very few words were spoken, since we all understood the significance of the event. We spent the next several hours washing the SHAR, removing panels, and cleaning up the mess. One of the biggest messes was trying to put the fully-fueled SHAR back into the hangar with a small garden tractor. Our little lawn tractor just wouldn’t do it. After all, we anticipated that the airplane would have been empty when it returned to the hangar. So we substituted a Chevy pickup, driven by Jack Shultz, one of our “eldest” volunteers. I don’t want to make an issue of his age and extremely valuable experience. The SHAR eventually made it back into the hangar safley, but it took 45 minutes and he had his left turn signal on the entire time. Seriously, Jack did a good job when tempers were getting short.

As one would imagine, the GTS failure dampened our spirits a bit, especially since we were so close to flying. We anticipated flying the first week in August. Now, we’re out for a GTS. But all is certainly not lost. Actually, a GTS failure is quite common and the nature of the beast. The GTS is notorious for this failure mode, similar to a lightbulb. It will work hundreds of times flawlessly, then fail without warning, in spectacular fashion. We are quite fortunate that it happened on our own ground. We can replace it on our own terms and conditions, rather than in East Sweatsock, Iowa. We will also have spares readily available for the next time, because with Harriers there WILL be a next time.

We’ve had e:mails and phone calls quite litterally all over the world serching for a replacement and/or repair. Lowes and Home Depot were fresh out of stock. We located a repair facility in North Carolina and are now quite certain our GTS can be repaired and that has been set in place. Cost and schedule – to be determined, but it is repairable. Additionally, we’ve located several potential spares and those are being procured as well. We may even develope the repair capability in-house.

This is just an unfortunate speed bump on the road to first flight, but we will still get there.

Even with all this, we are still not that far away from our first flight. I won’t predict when that will be, but it could still be very soon.

Sincerely,
Art Nalls, Jr.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 11th July 2007 at 21:49

Harrier T.52 G-VTOL for example with British Aerospace . In purely civil hands in the U.K – no chance!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,400

Send private message

By: Nashio966 - 11th July 2007 at 21:35

Caa allow one to fly here?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

448

Send private message

By: Vulcan903 - 11th July 2007 at 20:59

Just had an e mail from Art , after subscribing to his newsletters. The project sounds interesting and it will fly!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

281

Send private message

By: Phixer - 10th July 2007 at 17:50

Seem like the Americans are getting close to having their Sea Harrier in the sky

http://www.nallsaviation.com/

Good luck to them. I bet the paperwork mountain for this is impressive!

Rgds Cking

Interesting to see that this aircraft XZ439 was only the second SHAR built as an FRS.1, first flown in March 1979, and previously shipped to the US (and Elgin AFB) in Atlantic Conveyor for AMRAAM trials in January 1993. In October 1989 it went to BAe at Dunsfold as the second FRS.2 development conversion.

Sorry if you knew all that folks, but this would make it an interesting airframe from the detail perspective if my past experience with various Phantoms, Sea Vixens, Hunters and Canberras is anything to go by.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 10th July 2007 at 13:57

Two other cases spring to mind including a T.4 glided into Boscombe Down after engine failure. The earlier machines has a ram air turbine which would give you limited hydraulic control after engine failure . Later machines dispensed with it and gave you the option of the seat after the accumulators had been used up.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,488

Send private message

By: RPSmith - 10th July 2007 at 12:31

Harrier dead-stick landing.

Just browsing through Nalls Aviation’s website the biographical details of Art Nalls says
“While on a training mission attached to VMA-231, Art’s “Harrier” suffered a catastrophic engine failure near Richmond, Virginia. With little time to react, he essentially landed the Harrier engine-out at a civilian airfield. This was an extremely precise and risky landing, not normally attempted. The emergency procedures recommend an ejection. Art made a dead stick landing and he was consequently awarded an Air Medal, with gold numeral one for the act”

How many (if any) other pilots have successfully landed a Harrier without engine power? I thought the aircraft had the glide-rate of the proverbial brick.

Roger Smith.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,488

Send private message

By: RPSmith - 10th July 2007 at 12:19

This was news to me.
Pity they appear to be turning it into an AV-8 but, I suppose, “needs must”.
The project appears to be benefitting uk’s exports 😀

Roger Smith.

Sign in to post a reply