UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015

Yemeni rebels claim they have shot down a US-made drone

http://m.startribune.com/yemeni-rebels-claim-they-have-shot-down-a-us-m…

General Atomics To Weaponize French MQ-9 Combat Drones  

Another Russian drone under development. I had known about Altair and Orion-E, but I’m not sure if anyone has heard of Sirus before. (The article stupidly claims it is powered by a turbojet when it is clearly a turboprop)

https://www.defenseworld.net/news/25385/Russia_Unveils_its_Biggest_Ever_Drone_to_Compete_with_US_Global_Hawk#.XXETAuR8CUk

Kratos Valkyrie pre-series models said to be delivered by the end of the year, 20-30 for the USAF, and another 10 for unspecified clients: https://www.defence24.pl/zamowienie-na-valkyrie-jeszcze-w-tym-roku

FJ33 turbofan is the possible engine (unit cost $44k).

Details are scarce, probably for reasons of security. But I expect hundreds of production series aircraft to be delivered by 2021.
It’s unclear if this is the non-stealthy UTAP-22 or the stealthy Valkyrie, but my guess is they’re basically the same aircraft, just one version is stealthy, which suggests a 70% production line commonality.
Seeing as the basic aircraft is very simple, basically a cruise missile, a single production facility could produce hundreds of aircraft per year, and then offer stealth as an upgrade for a small increase in delivery time and cost.
I imagine the non-stealthy UTAP-22 model could drop in price to as low as $1 million a piece.

The Valkyrie seems me a clever concept but with a caveat or two: given that it is supposed to be launched with a booster and to land on its own belly, why the Air Force and not the Army also?

Second, even a payload of 500lbs (i.e. a pair of SDB) is really too small for anything.
Not any word on sensors also: if it have to autonomously find its own targets, let’s forget about the 2-3 mls pricetag.

It is pretty cheap though, so there is that

Russia’s searching for the “bird’s eye view”

Snowy Owl drone
https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-disguised-drone-as-owl-for-deadly-purpose-2019-6

Iran unveils new version of armed stealth UAV

Two interesting videos about said item and many other UAV/UCAV used by Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag9Ri37Sagc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15mG0FUqlk4

What to say?

Certainly the capability of Pasdarans to think Out of the Box is 101% confirmed there.
Technicals now have their own Air Force and it can even be a 5 gen one!
No parachute either, as claimed by jane. just retractabile skids.

UAV/UCAV are taking back the capability of develop and introduce in service new models in a reasonable period of time that conventional planes seems to have lost, RQ-170 was downed in 2012, Saegheh -1 was presented in 2016, the more advanced and design refined Saegheh-2 is already out and fully operative in 2019.

The primary requisites of sorveillance and strike drones are different one another: just compare how out of place the weapons carried under the wings of the otherwise well designed Sahed-129 look when compared to the conformal carriages or even the inner bombs bays of the strike ones.

Using Autonomous Drones to Rescue Downed Aircrew

The aircraft should be “highly autonomous” and flown remotely via secure data connections, similar to today’s remotely piloted aircraft. The service wants an affordable aircraft that can carry between two to four people, including one in a liter, for 200 miles. The aircraft should be able to operate in a variety of theaters, including the desert, jungle, and maritime environments, and its “signatures should be minimalized to reduce detection where able, with focus on lowest acoustic audible signature when taking off and landing with a landing zone that is not presurveyed and measuring 50 feet by 50 feet, but no larger than 150 feet.”

Ideally, the aircraft could be airdropped from a C-130 or H-47, but it also must be fully contained and able to be launched by a ground crew within 30 minutes.

Source:
Airforce Mag.com

How male MALE UAV’s do European Air Forces have? Is there a breakdown of their inventories?

Turkey currently has 150 MALE UCAV platforms in its Police, Army, Navy and Air Force inventories and another 200 on order.

4 Reaper for Netherland

Notice that Belgium got exactly the same number what should help integrating the force if that was ever the plan.

The Turkish Aerospace Industries ANKA-2 (now named ANKA-AKSUNGUR) has made its maiden flight today.

40,000+ ft Service Ceiling
Endurance: 30 hours
Engines: 2 x TEI PD-220
Weapons Payload: 1 Ton
ISR/ELINT Payload

DOD orders second stealth aerial target drone to be built to simulate stealthy Russian and Chinese designs.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pentagon-orders-second-stealth-target-drone-to-be-bu-456793/

Yes its rapid experimentation and validation via production in small batches. The price point for the Valk. is $2 Million for a production batch in the double digits..The idea is to produce a few batches…experiment with them and provide a canvas for the sensor and payload manufacturers and designers to develop suitable products and then if that works move into buying in larger amounts. Same idea with Gremlins..They want a working air-vehicle that can be launched and recovered in air by a C-130 and is affordable enough when produced in small batches so that they can have enough of them to try out various operational concepts and let the operators determine where they go next…Kratos is doing well on these contracts and competitions because it has a lot of experience of developing and working with suppliers on small-medium sized targets which are produced in small batches and where the cost is a major determinant of program success. The larger OEMs have experience on other ends of the spectrum i.e. very exotic and expensive fighters or relatively cheap but non-reusable missiles and other munitions.

Thank, Bring_it_on: so they are basically exploring different options to discover what is the most operatively suitable?

The Valkyrie seems me a clever concept but with a caveat or two: given that it is supposed to be launched with a booster and to land on its own belly, why the Air Force and not the Army also?

Why not the Army? It is supposed to partner and “sync” with the fighter fleet so yeah there is nothing stopping the Army from the service that works with the Air Force on deployment concept. The US Army has its own MUM-T focused on its attack helicopter fleet. Also the Navy since this thing is supposed to be able to land on water, be-recoverable, and offer a rapid turn around option. It is just that this current project is contracted by the US Air Force Research Lab..nothing is stopping from it being spun off into other service’s requirements just like MALD-N is a spinoff of the USAF MALD air vehicle with a USN specific EW payload.

Second, even a payload of 500lbs (i.e. a pair of SDB) is really too small for anything.

It has been envisioned as more of a sensor carrier as opposed to a pure bomb truck. Weapons carriage definitely seems to be secondary to other support (ISR, EW, SIGINT etc etc). There is also nothing stopping this concept from being expanded and this is precisely where Kratos is working as it is currently working on 2 acknowledged but classified UCAV programs (Project F, and Thanatos) under contract from the US Air Force or other US DOD customer. Perhaps it is a scaling effort or it could be something completely different.

The size is very much dictated by finding the right production partners, suppliers, production techniques (rapid prototyping, 3D printing etc) and propulsion for a vehicle with a price target of $2 Million for a production batch of 100 or less. I bet the size is probably the largest they thought they could build at that price point and with the ability to manufacturer at that scale. Perhaps when each of those independent cost elements are validated by the first few production lots (Kratos expects production orders this year) which will be used for additional experimentation then the USAF could consider scaling..But the upper limit of Price is a key specification on this program since being attritable is not an option but a requirement and you want to still keep the vehicle cost at single digit $ MM with the payload because if not then you can’t build the inventory required for an attritable concept to work.

Between MALD (non re-usable), GREMLINS (reusable), UTAP-22 and the Valkyrie (reusable) there seems to be different price and size points emerging for supporting different missions. Those are likely to expand further on both ends of the size and cost spectrum..

Not any word on sensors also: if it have to autonomously find its own targets, let’s forget about the 2-3 mls pricetag.

The average $2 Million price tag (for production b/w 0-100 vehicles) is the price target for the Air-Vehicle on contract with Kratos. The CNI and sensor suite is being developed through various other programs being worked by industry (Lockheed Martin and Boeing) and US Government agencies (DARPA and AFRL) and that is over and above the host platform cost, depending upon the mission set. DARPA has an entire program focusing on sensor convergence and affordable RF sensors (Radar, Comms, and EW/EA) meant for low-cost attritable platforms. The program is called CONCERTO:

https://www.darpa.mil/program/conver…ask-operations

The autonomy demonstrations have occurred on various platforms under various AFRL, DARPA and other USAF and USN led efforts but most notable of them is Lockheed’s Have Raider demonstrations – https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us…ider-demo.html

https://www.c4isrnet.com/air/2019/03/14/introducing-skyborg-your-new-ai-wingman/

Good point! Also the inherent simplification in systems design would obviously help keeping the cost down.

Regarding the Neuron, I did wrote years ago that this mad push for a full blown UCAV airframe as an attritable could only have been born in the mind of the greediest industry leader. It seems today madness is contagious.

*pronounce “MadnessEU” à la French.

The Valkyrie seems me a clever concept but with a caveat or two: given that it is supposed to be launched with a booster and to land on its own belly, why the Air Force and not the Army also?

Second, even a payload of 500lbs (i.e. a pair of SDB) is really too small for anything.
Not any word on sensors also: if it have to autonomously find its own targets, let’s forget about the 2-3 mls pricetag.

this thing doesn’t have a landing gear so it could have a much larger bay than a similarly sized vehicle with a landing gear.

Good point! Also the inherent simplification in systems design would obviously help keeping the cost down.

Regarding the Neuron, I did wrote years ago that this mad push for a full blown UCAV airframe as an attritable could only have been born in the mind of the greediest industry leader. It seems today madness is contagious.

*pronounce “MadnessEU” à la French.

LCAA is a loyal wingman, or an attritable AI enabled companion for manned aircraft. nEUron is a full blown UCAV and is most definitly not going to be attritable and won’t be at a price point that can allow one to buy hundreds to thousands to use alongside the manned fighter/bomber fleet.

DJC, the requirement was for a 500 lb payload. I don’t they ever specified what that payload could be in terms of specific weapon types. Also, this thing doesn’t have a landing gear so it could have a much larger bay than a similarly sized vehicle with a landing gear.

The principle of Barracuda is not dropped. Simply expect something looking more like a nEUROn.

it won’t make it attritable. What is 90% of LCAA intends…

[USER=”1724″]djcross[/USER] : Barracuda had a similar “payload” (what might however have to include sensor and weapon).

And notice how funny is the fact that EADS had twice to put aside what seems that could look today winning projects (Barracuda / Mako).

LCAA requirements include a mission package of 500 lbs, which could include a JDAM. The current Valkyrie is probably to small for that.