July 26, 2006 at 12:10 pm
I have been thinking long and hard about this UK USA relationship for sometime now and i can see how it benefits the USA but for the life of me i can not see how it does the UK as a whole any favours and its certainly not done Tony Blair and his government any favours, I am guessing we are mainly involved so if times of war the USA would protect us but do we need that in the Day and age of the Terrorist as to apposed to threat from another nearby Country?. Maybe it for trade, But surely we should trade more with our partners in Europe rather than USA, After all we are but of the EU not another US state.
Clearly the US does better from this deal as the UK is a great little outpost to base its Aircraft etc and in the case of Israel situation its a great refueling stop to deliver bombs to attack Lebanon, A great stopping point before going to the Middle East, Also our UK Armed forces are a good Ally to have as they are well trained and more than capable of most tasks required from them.
But whats the UK getting in return?, Why is it that every Government we have had has when America has asked us to Jump we have Asked “How High?”, We have been driven into Crisis after crisis with this so called relationship is it worth it?.
Maybe i am being over political or over sensitive here but i really don’t feel we have benefited at all, Whats your views?.
By: Paul Rix - 30th July 2006 at 13:27
Personally I think the UK has a lot more in common with the USA than it does with Europe. Moving over here was not that much of a culture shock (although there are obviously cultural differences). If we look back over the last 100 years it is obvious who our friends are and who can be relied upon when our back is against the wall.
By: SaYAhSay - 29th July 2006 at 03:21
Support for the IRA was US tax payers money ?
How about if equipment was sold to the UK at Israeli prices ?
‘Ok we sell in bits at a price more than we sell them fully assembled and delivered to Tel Aviv.’
How about as alleys, the UK fights a war for the US only to discover the US is advising and aiding the other side too.
How about as partners and close war allies the UK leans on a neighbour Norway, because they are screwing around with the wink wink sssssh ‘special Oil prices arrangement’ and the UK agrees to buy masses of chemical and WMD just in case.
How about the UK and US both sign an agreement which prevents both from rushing into the middle east and grabbing oil contracts at the end of the war, BUT he of forked tounges think it perfectly okay, if a new Californian Oil Co rushes in and signs up the deals. California is not America, a part of it but not America, OH sorry the UK thought we meant the US, when we meant us.
There are not many in history that have got an equal deal with the US, Israel only because it’s supporters run the politics anyway. There can not be any other reason at all. what for justice, for fairness, for humanity. As soon as the oil runs out Israel is on its own, instability is a god (excuse the pun) send to US oil interests.
By: djcross - 29th July 2006 at 02:48
Think hard. What method would you use if you wanted to pump $Billions of US taxpayer money to help the Brit economy? Hint: It’s been happening since 1942, but saw a downturn in the 1990s.
By: Pete_sj - 29th July 2006 at 02:04
“What Does The UK Get From It?”
How about a free dental plan? No, no, that’s way too much money. How about a free dental consultation?
By: sferrin - 28th July 2006 at 21:43
They didn’t come free of charge, Sferrin. 🙂
Undoubtedly but who else do you think we’d let buy them at ANY price? (Could you imagine the ruckus if Taiwan said they wanted to buy some LOL! )
By: Arabella-Cox - 28th July 2006 at 18:07
Also the UK managed to win a significant concession from the US over the JSF project. Could another country have got that? Possibly not. Plus there was the US support for retaking the Falklands – again, another country might have been pushed to “let go” by the US, so the latter could keep its links to South America bright and bonny.
In many respects the US does have similar foreign policy goals to us, so it’s natural to team up with them when they converge. Other countries can’t do that so easily because they don’t have the historical/cultural links.
That said a good friend tells someone when they’re making a bad mistake and refuse to help them shoot themselves in the foot. However, unfortunately, Tony Blair was starting to realise it wasn’t that easy to make a domestic policy legacy for himself, so he decided being an “international statesman” would get his name in the history books instead. It has, but probably not in the way he hoped!
By: Sauron - 28th July 2006 at 05:15
Well it’s the UK that comes out the winner in the relationship as any objective look at the last 90 years makes clear.
The U.S. came to the aid of the UK twice during that period.
This was the main reason the UK was able to hold on to much of it’s empire during the cold war period and preserve it’s position as a significant economic and military power.
Sauron
By: Corsair166b - 28th July 2006 at 04:11
Wow…was gonna say something but as a Yank (and apparently not a very popular member of the United States) I think I’ll just keep my trap shut and HOPE for now that those who I count as my UK friends are still that…friends….it sure as hell looks like I ain’t gonna make any NEW ones around here…
A NON member/ or supporter of the Bush cabinet,
Mark
By: J Boyle - 27th July 2006 at 16:11
Trade, Tourism…but most of all, it gives Brits someone (else..besides the French, Spainish, Germans, etc) to gripe about and generally feel superior to. 😀
By: duxfordhawk - 27th July 2006 at 15:40
Seems we all feel the same about this special Relationship, So it poses the Question why have several governments signed up so wholeheartedly to this Deal, Is it due to the US effort during World War II?.
Would Tony Blair and his government me more popular if they had avoided getting involved in America’s battles and stayed well away from Iraq?, My feeling is yes.
Think its time we let Bush do what he wants and we stay well clear of it and the all the Sh1t that comes with it.
By: Paul F - 27th July 2006 at 09:20
Oh UK gets a lot out of the SR…
What does UK get from the Special relationship..?
Being held over a barrel and sh*ft*d at every opportunity??? :dev2:
i.e.:
The one-way option of having her residents extradited despite them having committed no offence on US territory, or against US entities – with no apparent way (or political will) of stopping the extradition.
The priviledge of being used as stop over for rendition flights.
The priviledge of being used as a stop over for flights full of ordinance thats on it’s way to Israel.
No access to the critical engineering know-how that may (or may not) be an integral part of the JSF (if it ever happens).
See, the list of goodies the relationship brings is endless……. :rolleyes:
Paul F
By: Grey Area - 27th July 2006 at 07:02
They didn’t come free of charge, Sferrin. 🙂
By: sferrin - 26th July 2006 at 21:47
D-5s.
By: lukeylad - 26th July 2006 at 21:44
Tonnes of exersise space for the RAF.
By: plawolf - 26th July 2006 at 19:31
A pat on the head and a list of chores. :rolleyes:
By: Barnowl - 26th July 2006 at 15:27
The fact that the US will never ever call us harbourers of terrorism and invade us… Well probably, anyway.
BARNOWL
By: tenthije - 26th July 2006 at 12:33
But whats the UK getting in return?
That would be about it? 😀 😉