July 1, 2018 at 4:28 am
Hi
Can someone give me an estimate of unit cost of F-16 and Mig-23ML in 1990
thanks
By: paralay - 10th July 2018 at 20:24
The US pilot fought against the Russians? Or did he see enough CNN?
By: Freehand - 10th July 2018 at 19:50
A USAF pilot was quoted saying “I hope they mass-produce the MiG-23 and export it everywhere. In that case, we won’t have to do much fighting. The Russians are going to kill themselves flying it.”
By: LastOfGunfighters - 10th July 2018 at 01:07
I very much doubt any MiG-23 could perform a 9G sustained turn which the F-16 could do at low altitudes. I think later MiG-23s were rated for 8.5G, earlier ones less than that.
For whatever reason Western pilots who had the opportunity to fly the thing (like the USAF’s Red Eagles) seemed to hate it despite remarking on its very impressive acceleration.
By: Levsha - 6th July 2018 at 21:31
I want to remind you that the modifications of the MiG-23ML and MIG-23MLD were equal in maneuverability F-16
Well, as there probably aren’t any MiG-23 left flying (Angola?) around world – who cares?
By: TomcatViP - 6th July 2018 at 20:13
Really? 30 deg AoA and 9g?!
By: paralay - 6th July 2018 at 18:22
I want to remind you that the modifications of the MiG-23ML and MIG-23MLD were equal in maneuverability F-16
By: schurem - 6th July 2018 at 16:50
More like 5 or 6 if the Soviet Politbureau sufficiently likes you, your cause and your chances to put a spanner in the international imperialist capitalist machinery 😀 And like the Man said; quantity has a quality all of its own. 12 floggers tag teaming a pair of vipers would probably not end well for the vipers. Especially if they don’t rock AMRAAM.
By: nastle - 6th July 2018 at 15:44
thanks
so approx 3 xmig-23 ( 6 million each) can be bought for the price of 1x f-16 ( 18-20 million)?
By: paralay - 5th July 2018 at 12:54
MiG-23
The internal price of 2 – 2.5 million rubles
The external price of 3.6 – 6 million $
By: nastle - 4th July 2018 at 07:19
^ was it the migs from egypt ? that must be the mig-23MS
By: schurem - 3rd July 2018 at 07:59
I been reading Red Eagles, about the secret squadron if MiG’s that the USAF had squirreled away at Tonopah. They consistently bemoan the -23’s horrible, terrible, awful flying qualities. They absolutely dreaded flying that thing in anything but a fast, straight line.
By: KGB - 3rd July 2018 at 04:08
Im still just curious. What does a big hulking swing wing Mig 23 fighter/interceptor have to do with F-16’s ?
There is plenty in the US inventor to compare Mig 23’s to. Phantoms. Avadarks. Tomcats.

By: nastle - 2nd July 2018 at 23:00
Not vey agile – like any other aircraft that’s heavily laden.
so in A2G missions they needed escorts ?
Like in Osirak raid ?
By: nastle - 2nd July 2018 at 22:59
I meant the cost of Mig-23ML to domestic market i.e VVS or PVO
By: Levsha - 2nd July 2018 at 22:28
yes indeed f16 was a great multirole aircraft in the 80s, I wondered how agile it was when burdened with external loads when carrying out strike missions though ?
Not vey agile – like any other aircraft that’s heavily laden.
By: eagle - 2nd July 2018 at 22:21
one MiG-23MS was released for $ 3.6-6.6 million. (depending on the degree of “friendly location” to the buyer country).
The above statement illustrates why a comparison is difficult. What version of MiG-23 are we talking about? MiG-23MS was an export monkey model. What “customer” are we talking about, i.e. level of friendliness.
Has the MiG-23 in a non-monkey-model version ever been sold to a non-puppet state? Prices among socialist brother states are pretty meaningless, as are rip-off sales to arab countries.
Whereas in the west, GD/LM probably charged the full amount to every customer.
By: nastle - 2nd July 2018 at 22:02
Schrem
Yeah that’s kinda lame. Comparing top of the line F-16s to Mig 23’s.
The Soviet answer to f16 was Mig 29
this thread is set in the late 80s to 1990
large numbers of mig-23ml and mf confronted f-16A/C during this era
mig-29 was only in small numbers like 700 in VVS by 1989
By: nastle - 2nd July 2018 at 21:52
Thanks Levsha
yes indeed f16 was a great multirole aircraft in the 80s, I wondered how agile it was when burdened with external loads when carrying out strike missions though ?
By: Levsha - 2nd July 2018 at 20:22
no just a simple comparison thats all
I personally think F-16A/C in the pre-AMRAAM era was a pretty overrated A2A fighter
Of course, the F-16 was always a multirole aircraft from the beginning – MiG-23, not so much.