dark light

  • skog

Uniteds competitors lobbying against the loan.

Executives at other airlines savored the federal government’s rejection of United Airlines’ request for a loan guarantee last night, after some of them had lobbied intensely against any bailout.

“At the end of the day, it’s good for our industry, and it’s good for the American people,” Gordon M. Bethune, chief executive of Continental Airlines, said last night, talking about the rejection of the loan application.

United’s competitors are likely to steal some of the airline’s passengers as it struggles to restore its finances and suffers through the distraction and publicity of a probable bankruptcy filing, industry analysts said. American Airlines, United’s main rival in Chicago and one of its chief competitors in California, stands to benefit the most, analysts said.

But the biggest prize would be United’s rights to fly overseas routes, which a judge could order the company to sell if it files for bankruptcy protection. The jewel in United’s system is its extensive schedule of flights across the Pacific to Asia, much of it acquired in 1985 when United bought the rights to fly those routes from a struggling Pan American World Airways.

Over the last week, United’s rivals sent their own financial analyses of the airline’s condition to the Air Transportation Stabilization Board, the federal body created after the Sept. 11 attacks to help the industry. The executives argued that United’s business was broken and that the $1.8 billion in loan guarantees it sought would end up being wasted, ultimately to be paid by taxpayers.

Douglas M. Steenland, the president of Northwest Airlines, praised the board for doing “an incredible amount of work” and called its decision “the right one.”

In the coming months, the loan rejection and even a bankruptcy filing are likely to lead to some cutbacks in service at United, which is based outside of Chicago and has a major hub at O’Hare International Airport there, but travelers should expect the airline to maintain most of its routes, travel agents said. US Airways is already in bankruptcy protection, and Continental emerged from earlier bankruptcies to become one of the industry’s stronger carriers, the agents said.

“In the near term, it will mean nothing for travelers,” said Hal F. Rosenbluth, the chairman of Rosenbluth International, a large travel agency based in Philadelphia. “The stigma of an airline bankruptcy has, for all intents and purposes, lost its negativity over the years.”

Industry executives said they had expected the government board to reject United’s request and were surprised only by its timing. Others noted that the letter from the board to Frederic Brace, United’s chief financial officer, was both detailed and blunt in its criticism of the company’s business plan.

Many analysts had expected the board to delay its decision until United’s mechanics had voted on concessions that they rejected earlier. That vote, which was scheduled for today, was called off last night.

“I was a little surprised they didn’t wait,” said C. Thomas Nulty, president of Navigant International, a travel agency based in Denver. “But I guess they decided that even if it went United’s way it wouldn’t have made a difference.”

United executives, while vowing to do everything they can to avoid bankruptcy, say that their rivals opposed the loan guarantee primarily so that they could benefit from the company’s troubles. Last night, the company’s supporters expressed disappointment with the decision.

J. Dennis Hastert, the Republican from Illinois who is speaker of the House, “thought United presented a fair and balanced proposal to the board,” according to Peter M. Jeffries, a spokesman.

As the nation’s second-biggest airline, after American, United is “too important to the traveling public” to be put at risk when the economy is weak and the holiday travel season is coming, Mr. Jeffries added.

Aside from incremental gains in market share, other airlines might most benefit from United’s woes by buying some of its international routes. Airlines approved by safety regulators have free rein to fly within the United States, except at a few crowded airports, but international flights are restricted by trade agreements.

United has a relatively large number of flights to Asia and Latin America and a good number of flights to Europe as well.

Both American and Delta Air Lines have tried in recent years to win new rights to fly to Asia and would probably be among the most eager bidders if United is forced to sell its Pacific route system.

“That asset has great value,” Mr. Nulty said, “and I know United is worried creditors will view that as a way to get some of their money back.”

——————

Seems to me like the vultures are circling the struggling animal already. And picking on it to kill it off completely. 🙁

What annoyes me here, is that these corporate asshats seems to have no regard for human life. Ok, so it’s business, but United have around 90000 employees, and in addition they generate thousands and thousands of other jobs around the world.

I might be naive, but i just dont see how it will help American economy to throw what must be, in total, way over 100.000 people into the unemployment lines. Maybe they could be a bit more honest and say, “hey, by sacrificing all those people and families, we will save our own asses!”…

Ok, rant off! 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,864

Send private message

By: KabirT - 6th December 2002 at 06:35

RE: Uniteds competitors lobbying against the loan.

UA is one of the best Airlines and best out of USA…..sad to see it sinking like this.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

284

Send private message

By: Selsport69 - 6th December 2002 at 00:02

RE: Uniteds competitors lobbying against the loan.

Its always a sad day when airlines start failing but even more of a sadder day if I lose my holiday because of it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 5th December 2002 at 13:36

RE: Uniteds competitors lobbying against the loan.

Well why exactly did the American people decide not to fly anymore? UA was a badly run airline which was…coping. The American people dstroyed it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

38

Send private message

By: skog - 5th December 2002 at 11:04

RE: Uniteds competitors lobbying against the loan.

>Why is one of biggest capitalist cie asking for public
>money? Capitalism point of view is fine when profits are
>high and Tax money good when profits are gone ? That’s a
>strange vision of capitalism !!!
>They are complaining , about terrorist attacks , bad market
>, competition , bad customers etc ….. I didn’t read about
>MISMANAGEMENT !!!!

They can never say mismanagement. Besides, corporate CEOs get bonuses for everything they do. And if they are fired, they even get a “golden parachute” as we call it in Norway.

The director of Braathens Airline got a huge golden parachute when he left, and bechause of that expense, the airline was even worse off, so their only choice was to be bought by SAS and become a regional carrier for them.

>I’d really like those fat cats to admit that they screwed
>up.

They never would. Hell, even companies that make huge profit fire people just to save money, so that the bosses can meet their quotas so they get bonuses. 🙁

>However I’m afraid that UA is the first one , what about AA?

They going next, i think. But sometime the market has to turn, im not afraid of flying, and i never have. If the american networks, like FOX news who i think is the sickest of them all, stopped their scaremongering, perhaps the industry would recover faster.

Incidentally, i recommend the movie “Bowling for Columbine” !! 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,866

Send private message

By: Hand87_5 - 5th December 2002 at 09:41

RE: Uniteds competitors lobbying against the loan.

It’s a shame that a such nice airline might end as TWA , Panam and many other.

however this brings me to some consideration.

Why is one of biggest capitalist cie asking for public money? Capitalism point of view is fine when profits are high and Tax money good when profits are gone ? That’s a strange vision of capitalism !!!

They are complaining , about terrorist attacks , bad market , competition , bad customers etc ….. I didn’t read about MISMANAGEMENT !!!!

I’d really like those fat cats to admit that they screwed up.
However I’m afraid that UA is the first one , what about AA?

Sign in to post a reply