dark light

  • Mark12

Venomous

Not my usual thing…but great weather for short while at North Weald yesterday.

Mark

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/Mark12/IMG_2138a.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

883

Send private message

By: roberto_yeager - 31st March 2025 at 12:56

Beautiful!!!:eek:

1Saludo

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

246

Send private message

By: Toddington Ted - 31st March 2025 at 12:56

Oh yes, that is very nice!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,313

Send private message

By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 12:56

Lovely shot. How nice to see it with a “proper”nose.

John

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 31st March 2025 at 12:56

Cracking shot of a lovely aircraft.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

178

Send private message

By: Easy Tiger - 31st March 2025 at 12:56

Just completing a major service by Weald Aviation for Air Atlantique Classic flight. The tanks will be painted the correct colour once tested. Nice shot in a momentary sunny spell

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

50

Send private message

By: Davej - 31st March 2025 at 12:55

Lovely shot. How nice to see it with a “proper”nose.

John

Agreed. But why the hell do they insist on fitting those bloody underwing tanks! They were never fitted ‘in period’ during RAF service. And yes I know its an ex Swiss machine.

Accuracy. One thing AACF has never been big on!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

550

Send private message

By: Ewan Hoozarmy - 31st March 2025 at 12:54

why the hell do they insist on fitting those bloody underwing tanks

A) because they can, and
B) Cos it makes it go further

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

467

Send private message

By: megalith - 31st March 2025 at 12:54

Sorry, you can only insist on acurracy when YOU pay the bills.

In all honesty people who nit-pick about things like drop tanks on the Venom really P!ss me off:, AACF do as much for the preservation of this country’s jet and post war aviation heritage as shuttleworth do for the preservation of our pre-war heritage. Additionally they give ordinary enthusiasts the chance to actually fly in historic aircraft.

So just get real, you can’t reverse time so just be glad someone is willing to reach into thier pockets and fork out the tens of thousands of pounds needed to keep this Venom flying.

Steve

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,224

Send private message

By: inkworm - 31st March 2025 at 12:54

Historical accuracy depends on many things, if you are going to be a total purist then it could be argued that none of the current warbirds flying are actually accurate as they have all had replacement parts that have been created since they first flew.

It’s always nice to see things as they were in an ideal world but something is much better than nothing.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,455

Send private message

By: merlin70 - 31st March 2025 at 12:54

Not my usual thing…but great weather for short while at North Weald yesterday.

Mark

I can’t believe that you were there simply because the sun came out. Anything Supermarine you are able to share with us?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

46

Send private message

By: flyingant - 31st March 2025 at 12:53

Thanks for the great photo of the ex J-1614 (WK436). Good to see she is being well looked after! Here’s something perhaps more to your taste?!

MV268 on a visit to Sion (the Venom’s old base)

http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu235/ant-45/DSC_4762.jpg

And to keep the Venom theme, here’s J-1630!

http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu235/ant-45/venom.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 31st March 2025 at 12:53

Agreed. But why the hell do they insist on fitting those bloody underwing tanks! They were never fitted ‘in period’ during RAF service. And yes I know its an ex Swiss machine.

Accuracy. One thing AACF has never been big on!

You’re talking the language of complete and utter lets be nice please…, RAF single seat Venoms could and indeed did carry underwing tanks.

Irrespective of our views, or what is ‘right and wrong’ the owners of these wonderful jets are entitled to do what they wish with them.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

46

Send private message

By: flyingant - 31st March 2025 at 12:52

why the hell do they insist on fitting those bloody underwing tanks! They were never fitted ‘in period’ during RAF service.

Accuracy. One thing AACF has never been big on!

You neither it seems. Get your facts right. This is WR413 which served with 6 & 208 squadrons, in 1955.

http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu235/ant-45/ven.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,167

Send private message

By: WJ244 - 31st March 2025 at 12:51

It is nice to see authenticity in vintage aviation but if the owner of a classic aeroplane choses to paint it luminous green with orange stripes then that is their choice and I don’t feel I have any right to complain loudly unless I am in a position to buy the aircraft and repaint it myself.
When Southend museum got their Storch D-EKMU it was a bright orange with black trim stripes and at the time we were just pleased to have what was originally intended to be an airworthy Storch. I am not entirely sure why she was grounded but I think it was a problem with CAA requirements that hadn’t been forseen before the aircraft arrived in the UK.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,313

Send private message

By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 12:51

I think Dave J was actually refering to the style of the tanks, not the fact that the Venom did/could carry underwing tanks.

John

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,455

Send private message

By: merlin70 - 31st March 2025 at 12:50

Yes that book.

Ah yes the book. Is there a date for publication?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

66

Send private message

By: The Beach - 31st March 2025 at 12:50

I think you will find the Spitfire is not MV 268 but is MV 263

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 31st March 2025 at 12:50

I think you will find the Spitfire is not MV 268 but is MV 263

I think you will find it is MV293 painted as ‘MV268’. πŸ™‚

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 31st March 2025 at 12:50

I can’t believe that you were there simply because the sun came out. Anything Supermarine you are able to share with us?

“It will all be in the book” πŸ™‚

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,322

Send private message

By: Graham Adlam - 31st March 2025 at 12:49

“It will all be in the book” πŸ™‚

Mark

Mark it does not appear to have a propeller? Is this some Mk of Spitfire we haven’t seen yet?? Book ? can you enlighten us ? I am sure Key cannot object when so many here would have in interest in that.;)

1 2
Sign in to post a reply