June 13, 2006 at 3:58 pm
fro aircraft movements in the world.It must be high as it is a very busy airport
thanks
By: Grey Area - 14th June 2006 at 21:15
Did you include light aircraft and helicopters? :D:D:D
By: David Kerr - 14th June 2006 at 21:13
I’ve looked at my log of that day and seen that I’ve recorded 847 movements in a 24 hour period (there’s probably quite a few I missed!) with only 305 different aircraft.
Unfortunately didn’t record arrival or departure times on all movments but the bare minimum movements are:
32 from 0000-0659
199 from 0700-1059
197 from 1100-1459
200 from 1500-1859
139 from 1900-2359
So it was a minimum of 50 per hour for 12 hours – I’ve only 80 movements without timings so it could be squeezed upwards to about 53 per hour if only 36 of the “timeless” ones occurred in the 12 hour period.
By: Grey Area - 14th June 2006 at 19:37
On the 28th May 2003, MAN topped 60 movements per hour at the peak of arrivals for the Champions League Final at Old Trafford.
Happy days….. :D:D:D
By: David Kerr - 14th June 2006 at 19:05
R2 was designed to allow just slightly over 60 movements per hour, from memory.
It may have that theoretically maximum, but I’ve been at MAN a good decade or so ago when it was churning out 50 in an hour on a single runway on a theoretical max of 42 an hour. If push came to shove, I’ve no doubt 70 could be acheived.
By: philgatwick05 - 14th June 2006 at 15:42
😀
By: Pablo - 13th June 2006 at 22:07
For the past few years, I’m pretty sure that MAN has been in the 45-50 bracket of worldwide airports in terms of pax.
I would imagine typical movement rates in peak periods are between 55 and 60 per hour, slowing to around 30 in single runway ops.
R2 was designed to allow just slightly over 60 movements per hour, from memory.
By: David Kerr - 13th June 2006 at 21:00
Some earlier passenger throughput and movements (rounded):
1965: 1.4 million, 47000 mvmts
1975: 2.7 million, 68400 mvmts
1980: 4.4 million, 83300 mvmts
1985: 6.2 million, 95600 mvmts
1991: 10.8 million, 151600 mvmts
1994: 14.8 million, 168000 mvmts
1997: 16.1 million, 168300 mvmts
MAN also handicapped by lack of full-length parallel taxiway to 24L/06R which means that when 24L is in use for landing, aircraft have to go in the loop and wait for a break in traffic for them to backtrack down the runway.
I would imagine typical movement rates in peak periods are between 55 and 60 per hour, slowing to around 30 in single runway ops.
By: Jon Taylor - 13th June 2006 at 19:56
Seeing as we’re on thr topic of MAN, does anyone have the passenger number for recent years? Would like to know how much of a rise there’s been.
In 2003
46 – Manchester (MAN) – 19 022 485
And you have 2004’s so you can see a big rise there!
Jon
By: A330-300 - 13th June 2006 at 19:44
Seeing as we’re on thr topic of MAN, does anyone have the passenger number for recent years? Would like to know how much of a rise there’s been.
By: dave@MAN - 13th June 2006 at 19:37
thanks
By: Jon Taylor - 13th June 2006 at 19:33
MAN only has two runways, one of which is closed half the day. So it does not take much to appear busy.
For environmental reasons apparntly, Manchester is extermely “Environmently Friendly”
Just incase you didnt know,
Here is Passenger numbers, so this might give you an idea!
2004’s (2005’s dont think its been published)
44 – Honolulu (HNL) 21 971 556
45 – Dubai (DBX) 21 711 522
46 – Manchester (MAN) 21 544 199
47 – Shanghai/Pudong (PVG) 21 124 233
48 – Kuala Lumper (KUL) 21 058 572
in 2005 i think MAN handeled around 22,000,000 pax, but not sure!
Jon
By: dave@MAN - 13th June 2006 at 19:21
that doesent matter the main one allways consently has something going on
LGW ONE RUNWAY ONE OF THE BUSIEST [U]
By: tenthije - 13th June 2006 at 19:16
Can only find top 30s, but MAN is not listed in them.
To give you a clue. For 2005 Long Beach (LGB) is listed as number 30 with 353’011 movements. Manchester has “only” 234’835 movements. By comparison, Atlanta was #1 with 980’386 movements.
In Europe Charles de Gaulle is largest with 522’619 movements (world ranking 11) followed by Frankfurt (490’147 #16), Heathrow (477’888 #17) and Amsterdam (420’633 #20).
http://www.airports.org/cda/aci/display/main/aci_content.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-54-57_9_2__
[quote=dave@MAN[/quote]It must be high as it is a very busy airport[/quote]Respectfully, that argument is a bit pale. MAN only has two runways, one of which is closed half the day. So it does not take much to appear busy. A good number of airports in the world ranking have numerous runways. For instance, Atlanta and CDG have 4, Schiphol has 6, Atlanta has 7 (with more proposed) etc.
By: dave@MAN - 13th June 2006 at 19:05
good thankyou
By: David2386 - 13th June 2006 at 19:03
I think your google must be broken, two quick searches returned the following.
http://www.airports.org/cda/aci/display/main/aci_content.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-54-55-2812_9_2__
and
By: dave@MAN - 13th June 2006 at 18:57
yes
what is it?
By: LBA-EGNM - 13th June 2006 at 18:48
I think by the post i think you mean, for example 10th busiesst in the world?
By: Grey Area - 13th June 2006 at 16:53
Moderator Comment
It’s unacceptable for this forum.
Please follow the same rules as everyone else if you wish to continue posting in here. If you are unwilling to follow our rules, post elsewhere.
Any further unacceptable postings may be deleted without warning or explanation.
GA
By: dave@MAN - 13th June 2006 at 16:44
sorry thats how i usually post
what does it rank in the world for:
biggest
busiest
is there stasticitics on it
i meen busiest in world not uk
By: Grey Area - 13th June 2006 at 16:40
Moderator Comment
You’ve already been warned about this, “Dave”.
Please follow the same rules as everyone else if you want to continue posting in here.
Thanks
GA