dark light

  • VX927

What Happened to Snoopy?

Just wondered what happened to snoopy, the met office C130?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

862

Send private message

By: Phantom Phil - 22nd May 2009 at 11:16

Snoopy to soldier on!

I was at Marshall’s last week and was shown around the outside of Snoopy. She now sports a modified refuelling probe with some sort of air sampling devise where the end valve once was. Unfortunately due to Airbus being a tad secretive I wasn’t allowed to take any pictures! What I was told however is that she is very low houred and because of this Marshall’s may keep her on for some time as simply a test vehicle even after the current engine and prop trials!;)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

57

Send private message

By: carmedic - 22nd May 2009 at 10:29

:diablo: Good choice of words – not……… 😀

Read it and you tend to think the worst don’t you? :diablo:

quiet right, not the best choice of words 😮

but it was a quick snap (photo) as I was driving past. I quickly poked my lens through the fence and snapped away, I had not realised it was ‘snoopy’ until I loaded the photo’s onto my PC a few days later 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 22nd May 2009 at 10:00

Ye gads, how much bigger is that engine and prop!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

790

Send private message

By: VX927 - 22nd May 2009 at 07:38

Mmm, how stupid do I feel now?!!!!! 23:40 when I wrote that… Think I must have already been half asleep!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

924

Send private message

By: hunterxf382 - 22nd May 2009 at 07:31

:diablo: Good choice of words – not……… 😀

Read it and you tend to think the worst don’t you? :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,400

Send private message

By: Nashio966 - 21st May 2009 at 23:55

ie, she was snapped (photo taken of?)

🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

790

Send private message

By: VX927 - 21st May 2009 at 23:38

XV208 snapped during engine test 22nd Oct 08

http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/240003.html

Sorry… But what snapped??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

57

Send private message

By: carmedic - 21st May 2009 at 23:16

XV208 snapped during engine test 22nd Oct 08

http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/240003.html

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

57

Send private message

By: Cambridge Flyer - 5th October 2008 at 10:26

“On Wednesday 10 September, the Integrated Project Team comprising Airbus Military, EPI, Ratier-Figeac and Marshall Aerospace completed successful full power powerplant runs on the A400M TP400 Flight Test Bed during approximately 2 hours of ground runs at MA’s Cambridge facility, UK.”

from MA website.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,989

Send private message

By: Fouga23 - 5th October 2008 at 09:46

Nope, seems there is a problem with the engine control software.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 5th October 2008 at 09:12

Very quiet here, has Snoopy flown yet?:confused:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,400

Send private message

By: Nashio966 - 19th August 2008 at 00:14

it does rather, do you think the whole aircraft could fly on the one engine? it seems to be double the power of the standard T-56 (if that is whats in this model?)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 18th August 2008 at 21:06

That TP400 prop looks positively evil just sat that waiting for its turn!:diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,828

Send private message

By: WP840 - 18th August 2008 at 19:38

XV208 was replaced in 2004 by BAe146-300 G-LUXE, the 146 prototype.

See here http://www.faam.ac.uk/

This is scandalous that Snoopy could have been replaced by an aircraft with a ‘normal’ nose! 😡

And what happened to Snoopy’s nose when they took it off XV208?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 18th August 2008 at 18:18

Snoopy seems to be up-and-around…..well, around, if not up yet. 🙂

http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/scene/cambridge/080731/snoopy.htm

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

741

Send private message

By: bloodnok - 16th December 2007 at 08:55

Could create some interesting assymetric power characteristics?

Imagine, taking off with two Allisons at full chat on one wing, the TP400 on the other, and they’ll still need the other engine in reverse! 😮 😀

Similar things have been done before, you may recall a few years ago XV181 was converted to carry a C-130 J engine in the number 3 position.
This was done to prove the aerodynamics of the nacelle and prop and get ‘flight’ figures.
However it was a much simpler task as the engine/wing interface was very similar, so not much in the way of modifications was needed.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

741

Send private message

By: bloodnok - 16th December 2007 at 08:48

Think both the L-100’s went to Safair.

All three of Air contractors L100’s were always owned by Safair and were only ever leased to Air contractors. from memory they usually still had Safair markings on them somewhere at the same time as Air contractors.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

741

Send private message

By: bloodnok - 16th December 2007 at 08:44

IIRC that the problem was the single shot fire extinguishers on all Allison turboprop engines. It stopped Air UK from having CV580 s years ago and caused no end of problems for Trans Meridians Herk plans. They eventually sorted something out when the Air Bridge Electras eventually got a UK C of A followed by Channel Express. ( Not sure what though)
Hope it helps
Be lucky
David

The fire bottle issue is one of the main reasons, also the other great stumbling block is the lack of emergency exits. the civvy L100’s have large emergency exits at the front, much like the later J models.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,360

Send private message

By: Bager1968 - 16th December 2007 at 06:35

But those are Jercules… not Hercules. 😀 😀 😀

1 2 3
Sign in to post a reply