September 30, 2005 at 8:52 pm
Manufactured by Farrand Optical, New York, serial number 136. In one of these pictures you can see the crosshairs,
In another the wires for the heater coil. The shafts for the prism controls are totally operational
By: JDK - 2nd October 2005 at 02:10
Bump.
SOMEONE must kno! Oh, it may not be a Spitfire widget. Therefore the expertise percentage plunges to 10% and the interest to nil :rolleyes:
By: Peter - 1st October 2005 at 14:12
thanks for the funnies guys but seriously the chap wants to know what it is…. Really
By: JDK - 1st October 2005 at 13:39
Malcolm. If it’s not, it ought to be. 😀
By: Malcolm McKay - 1st October 2005 at 13:29
If we told you we’d have to shoot you – oh what the hell we’ll tell you.
Its a ultra cosmic classified instrument to measure the enthusiasm level of the advanced air show attendee. At the first sight of the attendee’s favourite aircraft the instrument glows red and sends a signal to the organizers who immediately alert the nearest tee shirt vendor to offer the enthusiast their cut rate special embossed tee shirt.
It is called the Tee Shirt Vendometer.
😉
By: Moggy C - 1st October 2005 at 13:17
My best guess is that it’s either a spectroflurometer, filter flurometer, or associate instrument 😉
Moggy
By: J Boyle - 1st October 2005 at 06:09
An “Astro Navigator”.
By: Ron Cuskelly - 1st October 2005 at 05:45
Peter
Curiosity got me googling and although I didn’t find your mystery device I did establish that the company has been known as Optical Technology Devices, Inc. since 1944. Here is their website:
http://www.photonicsonline.com/storefronts/opticaltechnology.html
PS: If you click the link that says “Visit our Website” you will get a really helpful animation that tells us that they are now known as Farrand Optical Components and Instruments … and that’s all.
By: mark_pilkington - 1st October 2005 at 05:17
It looks like it might be the piece of the “Hubble” telescope they forgot to bolt on, that because it was missing, made the Hubble take those fuzzy pictures, – but I could be wrong, and maybe then it could just be a bombsight?
But I would have to agree with James,
that calling it a bombsight is the sort of thing someone would say who doesnt know what it is
where as I am calling it part of “Hubble” because I am absolutely sure I have no idea what it is – smiles
regards
Mark P
(incidently, I went to a Australian Government Emergency Complex in Victoria and found a piece of “SkyLab” mounted in the garden as a display, so this piece might turn out to be part of Skylab rather than Hubble – smiles)
By: JDK - 1st October 2005 at 05:05
Beats me.
I don’t think it’s a bombsight – it’s the sort of thing someone whould say who doesn’t know what it is (‘course, I can be proven wrong… 😀 )
Could be something for synthetic gunnery, navigation or bomb training?
By: Peter - 1st October 2005 at 04:42
dunno i received it through email as attachments wanting to know if it was a bombsight?
By: Feather #3 - 30th September 2005 at 22:56
Sun compass??
G’day 😉