October 17, 2002 at 3:12 am
[image]http://www.junmeng.org/lb5000/non-cgi//usr/28/28_1321.jpg%5B/image]
[image]http://www.junmeng.org/lb5000/non-cgi//usr/28/28_1321_1.jpg%5B/image]
[image]http://www.junmeng.org/lb5000/non-cgi//usr/28/28_1321_2.jpg%5B/image]
New chinese stealth plane?
By: EGTC - 5th February 2012 at 19:49
Thanks guys. It appears you’re right. I checked airframes.org (forgot about that site until 5mins ago) and found it was YR-BAN, B737-400 of Blue Air.
Many thanks for clearing that up quickly. 🙂
By: Doors4 - 5th February 2012 at 19:41
Its an airline called Blue Air.
Who I believe operate B737-300/400/500 aircraft.
By: Culpano - 5th February 2012 at 18:55
Its an airline called Blue Air.
By: RPSmith - 29th September 2005 at 23:32
Which is why they developed the SK-2…………
Ken
So that’s what a Gee Bee racer would look like with an in-line engine!
Roger Smith.
By: Flanker_man - 29th September 2005 at 17:30
PS – the SK part of the designation stands for ‘Skorostnii Krylo’ – High Speed Wing.
Smallest possible airframe to take a V-12 engine, smallest possible wing to make a safe landing on Soviet grass strips.
Ken
By: Flanker_man - 29th September 2005 at 17:25
For a fighter visibility would have been a major concern.
Which is why they developed the SK-2…………

Ken
By: Flakiten - 29th September 2005 at 14:59
thanks again.
By: GASML - 29th September 2005 at 10:18
Would be great for Reno though!
By: JDK - 29th September 2005 at 09:06
?
Before W.W.II the idea of a maneuvering dogfight at 300mph plus was discounted by various people (who might have known better) such as the Air Ministry, who came up with the fatal ”Fighter Area Attacks”. The early Spitfire had a flat topped and flat sided canopy, and the vertical height of the windscreen was less than 1 foot – to ensure speed. The Hurricane and Messersmitt Bf-109 both had heavily framed winscreens and the height of the windscreen was also small.
By: Moggy C - 29th September 2005 at 08:34
Sort of misses the point about being a fighter, doesn’t it? :confused:
Moggy
By: EN830 - 29th September 2005 at 07:55
For a fighter visibility would have been a major concern.
By: Flanker_man - 29th September 2005 at 07:46
What plane is this?
Thanks
It’s a Soviet Bisnovat SK-1 – an attempt by Bisnovat to produce the smallest possible fighter around the M-105 V-12 engine…..
A further variant – the SK-2 – had a raised cockpit giving a better view for the pilot.
Neither type entered service.
I made a vacform model of one a long time ago :-


A bit more info at :- http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/gustin_military/db/sov/SK1BISNO.html
http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/gustin_military/db/sov/SK2BISNO.html
Ken