dark light

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,139

Send private message

By: EGTC - 5th February 2012 at 19:49

Thanks guys. It appears you’re right. I checked airframes.org (forgot about that site until 5mins ago) and found it was YR-BAN, B737-400 of Blue Air.
Many thanks for clearing that up quickly. 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

109

Send private message

By: Doors4 - 5th February 2012 at 19:41

Its an airline called Blue Air.

Who I believe operate B737-300/400/500 aircraft.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

730

Send private message

By: Culpano - 5th February 2012 at 18:55

Its an airline called Blue Air.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,488

Send private message

By: RPSmith - 29th September 2005 at 23:32

Which is why they developed the SK-2…………
Ken

So that’s what a Gee Bee racer would look like with an in-line engine!

Roger Smith.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: Flanker_man - 29th September 2005 at 17:30

PS – the SK part of the designation stands for ‘Skorostnii Krylo’ – High Speed Wing.

Smallest possible airframe to take a V-12 engine, smallest possible wing to make a safe landing on Soviet grass strips.

Ken

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: Flanker_man - 29th September 2005 at 17:25

For a fighter visibility would have been a major concern.

Which is why they developed the SK-2…………

http://www.combatsim.com/img/5/9/0/sk2.jpg

Ken

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1

Send private message

By: Flakiten - 29th September 2005 at 14:59

thanks again.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

604

Send private message

By: GASML - 29th September 2005 at 10:18

Would be great for Reno though!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 29th September 2005 at 09:06

?
Before W.W.II the idea of a maneuvering dogfight at 300mph plus was discounted by various people (who might have known better) such as the Air Ministry, who came up with the fatal ”Fighter Area Attacks”. The early Spitfire had a flat topped and flat sided canopy, and the vertical height of the windscreen was less than 1 foot – to ensure speed. The Hurricane and Messersmitt Bf-109 both had heavily framed winscreens and the height of the windscreen was also small.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 29th September 2005 at 08:34

Sort of misses the point about being a fighter, doesn’t it? :confused:

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,978

Send private message

By: EN830 - 29th September 2005 at 07:55

For a fighter visibility would have been a major concern.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: Flanker_man - 29th September 2005 at 07:46

What plane is this?

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/3197/trivia8mx.jpg

Thanks

It’s a Soviet Bisnovat SK-1 – an attempt by Bisnovat to produce the smallest possible fighter around the M-105 V-12 engine…..

A further variant – the SK-2 – had a raised cockpit giving a better view for the pilot.

Neither type entered service.

I made a vacform model of one a long time ago :-
http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/Duffy/Bis-SK_03.jpg

http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/Duffy/Bis-SK_01.jpg

http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/Duffy/Bis-SK_02.jpg

A bit more info at :- http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/gustin_military/db/sov/SK1BISNO.html

http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/gustin_military/db/sov/SK2BISNO.html

Ken

Sign in to post a reply