December 11, 2016 at 2:23 pm
off the top of my head
1. J-10 is the same size as the F-16 because of some guy’s ability to use photoshop. disagreed he called you racist
2. plasma stealth is the future and superior to physical stealth
3. 787 was named with respect to Chinese culture. 8 being an important number. it had nothing to do with boeing’s numbering scheme
4. FC-1 exports, should be by 20 countries by the claims of some
5. Typhoon will have aesa and meteor by 2010
By: Y-20 Bacon - 12th December 2016 at 14:50
I told you guys before.. Bacon here loves drama. All sorts of X vs Y threads, which really is Nation X vs Nation y nonsens. Not very helpful.
Over at Defencetalk.com, the rules dictates no such threads. I sort of miss those rules here..
a bit more productive than bashing every type of US aircraft, right haarvey 😉
By: Y-20 Bacon - 12th December 2016 at 14:48
A good number of threads you make are just trying to flame and bring out subjective opinions of others, seemingly to create arguments from that. You either lack maturity or you’re just trying to create tension and drama.
nope. aside from you, and oblig, going about that holier than thou attitude, everyone here is not arguing about anything.
ironic that the guy complaining about drama, is the one creating drama.
By: FalconDude - 12th December 2016 at 14:16
I’ve been hearing this since the mid-90’s. How plasma-stealth based MiG-1.42 is the going to be the Raptor-Killer. The F-22 and ‘American-Stealth’ will be rendered useless. The fanboi claims of the MiG.-1.42 back in the 90’s deserve a special Nobel prize for creativity.
Pardon me, but fanboy ism aside, theoretically plasma stealth is better than shape stealth. The fact that it’s mostly unachievable has nothing to do with its theoretical merits.
By: haavarla - 12th December 2016 at 13:27
I told you guys before.. Bacon here loves drama. All sorts of X vs Y threads, which really is Nation X vs Nation y nonsens. Not very helpful.
Over at Defencetalk.com, the rules dictates no such threads. I sort of miss those rules here..
By: RadDisconnect - 12th December 2016 at 13:17
everyone is posting normally except you.
its fine since no names are being mentioned.
A good number of threads you make are just trying to flame and bring out subjective opinions of others, seemingly to create arguments from that. You either lack maturity or you’re just trying to create tension and drama.
By: KGB - 12th December 2016 at 03:52
That the Pak Fa is a large aircraft than the J-20
By: hopsalot - 12th December 2016 at 03:03
everyone is posting normally except you.
its fine since no names are being mentioned.
I nominate this post as the forum’s most ridiculous claim or statement.
By: Y-20 Bacon - 12th December 2016 at 02:47
This is nothing but a flame thread. Seriously how is this a productive topic at all? It’s just asking for mudslinging to happen.
everyone is posting normally except you.
its fine since no names are being mentioned.
By: Vnomad - 12th December 2016 at 02:17
J-10 is the same size as the F-16 because of some guy’s ability to use photoshop. disagreed he called you racist
The J-10 is just about the same size as the F-16.
.
.
.
.
.
.
racist
By: QuantumFX - 12th December 2016 at 02:07
off the top of my head
1. J-10 is the same size as the F-16 because of some guy’s ability to use photoshop. disagreed he called you racist
2. plasma stealth is the future and superior to physical stealth
3. 787 was named with respect to Chinese culture. 8 being an important number. it had nothing to do with boeing’s numbering scheme
4. FC-1 exports, should be by 20 countries by the claims of some
5. Typhoon will have aesa and meteor by 2010
I’ve been hearing this since the mid-90’s. How plasma-stealth based MiG-1.42 is the going to be the Raptor-Killer. The F-22 and ‘American-Stealth’ will be rendered useless. The fanboi claims of the MiG.-1.42 back in the 90’s deserve a special Nobel prize for creativity.
By: TR1 - 11th December 2016 at 20:57
What is with your crap drama threads?
By: obligatory - 11th December 2016 at 20:56
have to agree with radis, close this ****
By: RadDisconnect - 11th December 2016 at 20:26
This is nothing but a flame thread. Seriously how is this a productive topic at all? It’s just asking for mudslinging to happen.
By: obligatory - 11th December 2016 at 16:13
“the aero design of the SH is superbe.”
By: MadRat - 11th December 2016 at 15:12
Track While Scan has something to do with ‘synthetic displays’. Nevermind we had video games by the timeframe he was speaking…..