January 31, 2013 at 12:14 pm
On the back of Kitty Hawk with HMAS Melbourne alongside at Pearl Harbour.
Looks like a Turbo Porter…
Picture from Making It Harder Than Necessary? 12 Dec 2012 By Tommy H. Thomason
http://thanlont.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/making-it-harder-than-necessary.html
By: wilkofife - 1st February 2013 at 09:25
I can reveal that the Porter was there to carry a V.I.P. Australian statesman on a courtesy visit.
The visit was cut short after twenty minutes when Sir Les Patterson discovered there wasn’t a bar on American ships……..:D
By: pagen01 - 1st February 2013 at 08:36
Revising the idea of M Class submarines and the Parnall Peto!:D
By: Newforest - 1st February 2013 at 07:38
Looks like an April 1st project. 😀
By: ngatimozart - 1st February 2013 at 05:40
😮 Would you care to explain what on earth is going on with that last shot of the Skyhawk on the Sub? 😮
Was a classified RAN project.
By: Cherry Ripe - 31st January 2013 at 18:09
I haven’t found any mention of PC-6s registered in Hawaii in the late 1970s.. which would suggest that it was something they “brought with them”.
Edit: According to this there were no actual PC-6s on Air America’s inventory by 1978. The tail livery doesn’t match AA anyway, nor does it match another known CIA operator of PC-6s, Continental Air Services. So is it a civvie bird on a carrier? Hmm.
Edit2: Oh-hoh! How does this livery look for a match? Bird & Sons, another cover operator.
By: Lazy8 - 31st January 2013 at 17:55
http://a4skyhawk.org/?q=2g/humor/aus_sub.htm
I have a suspicion there may be more to it…
By: hunterxf382 - 31st January 2013 at 17:41
but at least a Turbo Porter could land on a carrier…
😮 Would you care to explain what on earth is going on with that last shot of the Skyhawk on the Sub? 😮
By: Lazy8 - 31st January 2013 at 17:33
The entry before the bit about the admiral might be pertinent too. If they had gone to Africa they might have been doing something clandestine – I’ve no proof, but it’s not impossible.
I do have an alternative explanation:
http://pixar.wikia.com/Planes
😀
By: Cherry Ripe - 31st January 2013 at 17:24
Could it be the admiral’s barge? 😀
Funny you ask that; whilst moored at Pearl in late 1978 Admiral Davis succeeded Admiral Hayward as CINCPAC, onboard CV-63… according to this.
And it’s definitely about that date, or at least after October 1977 when VF-213 re-equipped with F-14s; you can see their tail insignia on the port fantail.
Edit: an on a tangent, this is an interesting article on how pressure from Helio lead to the cancellation of a Navy programme to use the Porter to support brown-water ops in Vietnam. Several years later the USAF “discovered” the Porter again for Credible Chase.
By: davecurnock - 31st January 2013 at 16:23
Could it be the admiral’s barge? 😀
By: FoxVC10 - 31st January 2013 at 16:06
Don’t you mean stern?
Apologies, but I am an ex crab, not a navy b*mmer.
Its front and back of a boat, toilet not a head and none of that man overboard malarkey for me!
Its a lovely photo thou, you can see the size differences between the two carriers clearly.
Just seems odd to find something like a PC-6 on an American (or any) boat. My first thoughts also where ex Vietnam but the photo is dated 1978 so a little late. The aircraft isnt protected either so probably not a delivery.
By: Flanker_man - 31st January 2013 at 14:08
The US Army operated the Helio U10 Super Courier in Vietnam – maybe one of those???
Ken
By: ericmunk - 31st January 2013 at 12:52
HMAS Melbourne was used to deliver Australian Army Porters to Vietnam in the early seventies.
Edit: obviously 1978 was a tad late for the Vietnam war… Picture would have been taken during Exercise RIMPAC 78.
By: Al - 31st January 2013 at 12:51
Can make it out a little better on another image of the same occasion, 10th May 1978…

but at least a Turbo Porter could land on a carrier…
By: Phantom Phil - 31st January 2013 at 12:45
Looks like a PC-6 Turbo Porter to me….
By: TonyT - 31st January 2013 at 12:28
I see it on the back of the roof, it looks like one.
By: mantog - 31st January 2013 at 12:28
Seemed light hearted to me…
By: hampden98 - 31st January 2013 at 12:23
Don’t you mean stern?