June 3, 2008 at 11:07 am
Might be a very “greenish” question to ask.. but here goes.
There must be hundreds and hundreds of aircrafts in the english channel, from Spits to Tiffies to Tempests to FW190 and anything inbetween. There must also be hundreds of planes in close proximity to the shorelines on both sides of the channel.
Is it totally not possible to at least try a few rescue missions for some of these aircrafts if they can be found? I mean, they did indeed find the Titanic and managed to bring up several artifacts from it. I’m not an expert in channel depths or anything but I would think that if the deep is the problem, there is at least the possibility of some of the ones close to the shorelines?
Is the problem that parts of these areas are made to be war graves and therefore not reachable? Or is corrotion the major issue and in reality theres nothing left of any planes? Or is it just a matter of economy?
By: Peter - 31st March 2025 at 12:38
After this length of time underwater, I can only assume that there would be little left mainly large items like engines etc..?
By: 617upkeep - 31st March 2025 at 12:38
In response to anyone seeking information regarding WW2 aircraft wrecks around the U/K and French/Dutch/Belgian/German/Danish/Norwegian coasts –
I am reading a very interesting book about WW2 Air/Sea Rescue Airborne Lifeboats – the title is – RESCUE FROM THE SKIES -The story of the Airborne Lifeboat by Stephen Brewster Daniels. ISBN 0-11-772761-X. Printed by H.M.S.O. It gives many accounts of ditched aircraft and more importantly, the last known navigation co-ordinates transmitted by these aircraft. No doubt many of them have deteriorated too much for salvage but it gives an idea of the number and types that went down. Very interesting reading for myself having served in the RAF in Coastal Command based at RAF Northwod in 1964/65 as a telegraphist/W.Opr(ground duties).
R. Braga
By: robmac - 31st March 2025 at 12:37
Can I just say that Barry’s Airfix Spitfire is the dogs hangers and would personally be thrilled to own such a thing as a full size plastic Spitfire.
Back too the wrecks, I tend to follow the wreck sites found in the Pacific jungles and oceans around there. The amount of wrecks of F4U’s, A6M’s and the likes is vast but the ones in the sea bed, albeit covered in coral, survive remarkably well, but the government forbids the recovery of any airframes I believe as a mark of respect for the crews and they’re families.
By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 12:36
Photo origin unknown.
That’s an Aichi Seaplane, identified some time ago.
John
By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 12:34
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=88668&highlight=Aichi+E13A
John
By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 12:34
Photo origin unknown.
This was posted on a couple of websites quite some time ago. and I identified it as a Aichi E13A Jake floatplane (sans floats). The “panel” holes are misleading as are the missing wintips and more info as to the site has appeared on the web in recent times.
John
By: Al - 31st March 2025 at 12:34
The Med has more water evaporation, which should leave a higher salt content than the Channel, which is open to the Atlantic. Depth and oxygen levels play quite a factor too…
By: richw_82 - 31st March 2025 at 12:34
That’s an Aichi Seaplane, identified some time ago.
John
More info please?
The fact it has curved leading edges, and aircraft such as the Seiran don’t, would lead me to say otherwise. The wing shape looks much more like a clipped wing Spit, given that the holes in the top surfaces are where you’d likely find cannon bays.
Original pic
Compare this:

Rather than this:

Regards,
Ric
By: scotavia - 31st March 2025 at 12:33
The Baltic provides the best preservation for underwater wrecks although research there tends towards wooden ships which have been located in incredible condition.
By: richw_82 - 31st March 2025 at 12:33
Thanks John!
Viewing objects through water is always misleading. I guess half the time the movement of water distort things and the other half your mind makes up.
Regards,
Ric
By: robmac - 31st March 2025 at 12:32
Maybe its because wood lasts longer than metal under those circumstances, look at the Mary Rose and how long she was under water for although not a lot left, it was considerably more than what would be left of a metal fighter or bomber. Saying that, I wonder if any Mosquito’s are in the sea that belly landed, but then again, would they sink being made of wood?
By: Me-109E - 31st March 2025 at 11:25
Oh and I apologise to Barry for the attack on his ‘Spitfire’
By: Arabella-Cox - 31st March 2025 at 11:25
Its just me then.
By: Me-109E - 31st March 2025 at 11:25
My point refers to the B-17 engines
I offered to look after them correctly but this was declined by the beach owner ten years ago.
By: Arabella-Cox - 31st March 2025 at 11:25
Nope.
I miss your point, Me109E.
What does this refer to?
Is it just me??
By: Me-109E - 31st March 2025 at 11:25
I know these B17 engines well and can confirm they are preserved by Barry for all to enjoy. Along with the Spitfire ( tupperware indeed!!), and many other artifacts from our aviation heritage, they are displayed in an ideal location next to one the most famous airbases in the Southwest, if not the country. If they hadn’t been offered to Barry and Barry had not been able to accomodate them, goodness knows where they’d be now……thrown back to the sea to continue to rot?? ….forming a breakwater somewhere, forever forgotten. I’m pleased to hear that one other engine is also in another museum close to the crash site.
This is one B17 and crew whose story will not be forgotten quickly thanks to one dedicated individual who found these engines a home.
As for the “attack” on Barry’s Spitfire ……..well at least he’s got one, and a fine lady she is too !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keep it up Baz!
Missed the point totally
I offered to recover these engines from the beach and have them imersed in purpose built tanks with fresh water that would be changed a couple times a month to remove the salt etc.
This offer was declined and they now sit in the open air rotting away as far as I know.
By: Arabella-Cox - 31st March 2025 at 11:24
Dornier 215 off the Dutch coast
By: Peter - 31st March 2025 at 11:23
Ok can we get back to the original topic please. If this continues it’s downward slide with snide remarks, this thread will be closed and suitable action taken.
Peter Moderator
By: spitfireman - 31st March 2025 at 11:23
Nick
You need to go back to my reply ( post 53) in this thread re; your rant at me.
You did not mention then how you would have treated these blades, etc
Please don’t insult peoples intelligence here, you obtain/buy then sell aviation items for profit?
I buy/obtain items for the public to see (free).
The header for post 53
A man’s passion under attack
that still stands, please…………no more snide comments.
Baz
By: Arabella-Cox - 31st March 2025 at 11:23
Nick (Me-109E)
Having read back through the posts I have found that you have resurrected something from four or five months ago. Hardly surprising that I (and probably anyone else reading your post) couldn’t immediately see what on earth you were talking about!
However, having read through it all I am afraid that one is drawn inescapably to the conclusion that this is patently a case of sour grapes on your part. Why else your posts? You clearly dont like the fact that he has them and you dont.
Uncalled for, unnecessary and pointless. Also, its unfair on Barry.