September 12, 2005 at 8:27 pm
Just noted that Jet Provost T4 XP688 now resides at the bottom of a scuba diving lake in Lancashire! See http://www.thedelph.com
Some may consider the JP something of a poor relation in the historical aviation fraternity, maybe hardly worthy of being saved to some, but there are plenty of dedicated aircraft preservationists out there who cut their teeth on the JP , and some of us that still love the old girls!
This kind of thing makes me seeth!, there are parts of that aeroplane (and other recently scrapped aeroplanes) that could be have been salvaged to at least keep others looking complete, and in some cases running, if only there was a bit more flag waving before this sort of destruction took place !
Whinge over (but i,m still driving up there to have a word with those divers), anybody else know of aircraft that have recently expired quietly, without ceremony, and who never got chance to sign the organ donor card?
XS186 ground crew
By: lauriebe - 23rd December 2006 at 03:16
Apologies for the late input on this one but I have only just realised that XP688 is the first JP that I flew in at Manby on 20 July 72. This was a formation trip around Lincolnshire to mark the close of Strubby. I had not realised it was still around.
Sad to hear of its final resting place.:(
By: Phantom Phixer - 20th December 2006 at 12:16
Yet as in other walks of life the minority ruin it for the majority
By: Dave T' - 20th December 2006 at 12:12
……. scrappies get annoyed about non serious buyers going just to look at an airframe and take pictures. The thought was these time wasters would just speed up the scrapping process.
Yes thats correct.
RIP XL391 🙁
.
By: Phantom Phixer - 20th December 2006 at 10:59
Very much agree with you Roy,
I have been in the market myself recently and although sources like wrecks and relics are an invalauble guide to sourcing an aircraft these publications dont hold all the answers.
In fact most of my leads came from people I know or through a friend of a friend.
To pool all that information in one source would be very very beneficial not only to prospective buyers but also with regards to saving airframes.
How feasible would it be though? I remember when I posted a thread enquiring about aircraft in srcapyards whilst searching for an airframe.
THe answers I received back (some being a little short and rude) were we dont do that on this forum as scrappies get annoyed about non serious buyers going just to look at an airframe and take pictures. The thought was these time wasters would just speed up the scrapping process.
Im sure there was somestuff out there I would have loved to acquired but missed out on as I was unable to find out details,
A vicsious circle 😀
By: wv838 - 20th December 2006 at 10:36
If none of us coughed up the cash to buy it and preserve it, how can we moan when someone chucks it in a lake ?
We really need a far better means of spreading news like aircraft available than we currently have, the grapevine is good – but it could be better.
Roy.
By: ALBERT ROSS - 18th December 2006 at 23:09
Mike, many thanks for posting that. It seems strange that CAW continued using the JP4 in 1973, when all the other FTSs had converted to the T.5.
Tried sending you a PM re Macaws, but you have no contact info. Appreciate if you could PM me, as I have an offer to make you? Thanks.
By: Foxy - 18th December 2006 at 22:47
XP 688
You may be interested in this picture of XP688 that i was flying in the Macaws in 1973. Sorry about the quality but i haven’t taken it out of the frame to scan it.
By: Moggy C - 7th November 2005 at 10:39
You can’t help wonder if anyone ‘flew’ it to the lake bed.
Might have been a bit problematical sitting in the cockpit in scuba gear and I’m sure there’s a thousand good reasons why not. But you’d be tempted, wouldn’t you?
Moggy
By: setter - 7th November 2005 at 10:31
There are also healthy numbers of Strikemasters in Aus and NZ as well as quite a few JPs –
Regards
John P
By: David Burke - 7th November 2005 at 08:20
Relight -It went down in the lake about twelve years ago- I will find the id for you.
By: Arabella-Cox - 4th November 2005 at 20:38
ANOTHER ONE ! Help please
Further to the loss of XP688 to a diving lake in Lancashire, i have found out today about ANOTHER JP that has gone down in a diving lake at Gildenburgh near Peterborough !
Could anyone cast any light on it’s identity ?
By: Arabella-Cox - 14th September 2005 at 20:04
Worthy replies guys, and some unavoidable truths.
We can’t preserve all of them, but it should’nt stop us noting the plight of historic aircraft, especially when, as is the case with the JP , there are several being scrapped, burnt, cannibalised and even cut up for simulators each year.
I know of at least four JP’s that will be destroyed or simply cease to be restorable airframes within 12 -18 months.At that rate the JP population will be halved in 10 -15 years.
If our awareness of the situation is raised, or constantly refreshed, perhaps the next one we see that is being cut up might be the one when we walk up to the guy with the torch and say ‘hold on a minute, what’s going to happen to this’ ?
By: stringbag - 14th September 2005 at 18:36
– There are two Mk.1s left, both in the UK, one at RAF Cosford, the other with Kennet Aviation.
– One Mk.2 is preserved in Australia.
– The Mk.3 variant is extremely rare, only one flier left based at North Weald.
– The Mk.4 variant survives in smallish numbers, a number were scrapped in the 1970s due to fatigue problems.
– Surviving numbers of the Mk.3A, Mk.5, Mk.5A and Mk.5B JP are very healthy compared to the others.
M
By: JDK - 14th September 2005 at 11:29
Wouldn’t it be fair to say there’s ‘enough’ JPs in preservation?
There’s flying examples on three continents, I believe (UK, Australia, USA) plus quite a few in preservation in the UK.
Anyone got numbers?
Do we have to ‘preserve’ EVERY old aircraft? How?
By: Bager1968 - 14th September 2005 at 09:34
As a veteran USMC jet avionics tech, and historic aircraft lover, who normally desires preservation and restoration, and who is also a diver…. all I can say is that she is still doing the job she was made for….. training people!
There are many Marine archeaologists, historians, and similar people who used to be merely recreational divers, but received enlightenment on some “rotting piece of abandoned metal”!
Sitting on the bottom of a lake, creating interest in otherwise non-aviation aware bubbleheads, is much better than being ground up at the recyclers, or rotting in a field & covered in weeds.
By: TobyV - 13th September 2005 at 23:41
Well I hope, and I’m sure, that yours is better looked after! This could have been a nice little restoration project for someone (I’ve seen much worse things brought back) but now it will inevitably become rotting Al2O3 to poison the fish in that lake 🙁
Any pictures of your one around?
By: Arabella-Cox - 13th September 2005 at 21:15
That’s the one Albert, a classic era scheme !
To answer your point TobyV , JP’s are still offered for sale intermittently, occasionally for a comparitively reasonable cost, a fairly complete example went for a touch over a £1,000 on ebay recently!
Whilst i,m sure most might argue that this is a good thing, it does mean that these aircraft are within easy reach of whimsical buyers,who don’t care whether it’s an aeroplane or a climbing frame.
Having said this, my example was obtained at a reasonable cost, so i suppose it’s an occupational hazard for JP’s as to who gets them, i can hear several JP undercarriage knees knocking now!
By: ALBERT ROSS - 13th September 2005 at 20:55
Thanks for posting the pic of XP688 in much happier times Albert.
I think the Macaws embelishments that adorned quite a few Manby JP4’s in the 60’s and 70’s was the best the RAF made of the tacky red / white /grey scheme.
I,ve done a bit of research into the colour schemes that JP’s wore through their service life, consensus is that the original overall bare metal / silver was universally hated by the groundcrews, they apparently they had to rub the whole airframe down with a kind of Brasso to maintain the finish, on a regular basis!
The second overall light aircraft grey was much more popular ,but the dayglo self adhesive strips were prone to severe fading in sunlight making the aircraft look very tatty very quickly.
Hence the final red/white scheme which we were subjected to for decades, and which annoyingly still adorn a vast majority of JP’s.
XS186 will be re-painted shortly , in her second service(1965 – 1968) scheme of light aircraft grey with (painted) dayglo and College of Air Warfare insignia…. sweet !
Photo’s to follow.
Lovely…you mean like this? The light grey was only applied between 1967-68 and not all JPs were finished like this, with most going from silver & dayglo into the red/white/grey scheme.
By: TobyV - 13th September 2005 at 20:53
Thats criminal 😡 🙁 That looked in really good shape too (beforehand). What is it all about, is someone doing a second remake of “Thunderball” on a very tight budget?
Surely that JP cant have come cheap ( I have seen some really for poor condition ones for sale at not-cheap prices) so I cant believe anyone would be this daft?? Its not my favourite aeroplane but I’m sure its great fun.
By: RMAllnutt - 13th September 2005 at 20:49
I noticed on their website that they emptied more than 250 abandoned cars from the lake, cleaning it up. Seems a little ironic that they are now happy to fill it again with our aircraft… and armoured personnel carriers by the looks of it too. What a strange thing to do! Not to mention, wasteful!
Richard