dark light

N5552.0W00425.9

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 312 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: GLA pics with hopefully better results! #559843
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    Nice to see one of the GSM 738’s in full colours…when did it get its tail decals ?

    G-CDEG has always had them.

    in reply to: Air scandic #565611
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    The Finnair 757’s have 227 seats. MTOW of 115T. Compared with the RR 757’s the PW ones have a higher MZFW and MLAW.

    in reply to: Gerona Crash Site #571145
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    The accident report can be found at http://www.aaib.gov.uk

    in reply to: bmibaby officially operating from Heathrow #576113
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    BMI are using the baby brand to sell their lower priced fares on BMI mainline. If you try to book say GLA-LHR on bmibaby you are then re-directed to the BMI mainline website where the fares are displayed.

    Best thing BMI could do is keep the Baby fare structure and roll everything back under the one brand again.

    in reply to: Hapy 21st Virgin #577025
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    Congratulations – I particulaly enjoyed the pic in the paper of SRB looking at Pamela Anderson as her cleavage popped out her top.

    in reply to: Boy hailed for air safety gadget #577333
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    The 1 issue is what would happen when you came to a runway exit.

    in reply to: I'm gonna cry…….. #577596
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    DME – as Martin says contact Disclosure Scotland.
    From memory, a conviction within the 5 years previous to you applying for an airside ID pass will prevent you from getting an airside ID – after 5 years I believe it is viewed to have lapsed.

    in reply to: Industry and the future #578886
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    As for the second issue, I have not seen anything like this discussed at all, have you a source? I am disappointed if the industry press has not reported on this. But either way it is unlikely to happen, unless of course France and Germany want to make their airlines uncompetitive on the world stage.

    Mostly on PPRUNE – that ever reliable source of fact :rolleyes:

    You are right when you say that such a tax would make the airlines of France and Germany uncompetitive. Can you then imagine the problems that would be created if they were able to force such a tax onto the rest of Europe.

    As for a tax on the fuel itself, this is probably also completely unworkeable – you could end up with the situation where it is left to individual countries to set the tax level and the airlines then decide to take more fuel or tech stop en-route to avoid paying the higher tax levels.

    in reply to: Industry and the future #579107
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    Actually the possibility of taxing fuel is VERY minimal, and infact in Europe we are probably going to see Emissions Charging instead (by 2008, inline with oher industries which are now taxed in this way, with airlines being assigned quotas of emissions. The ball is well and truly rolling for this, and it will be instead of fuel tax. This is a major debate in the industry, with most airlines coming forward in supprt of the idea (but personally I think this is because it will offer them a barrier to entry again for new carriers that cannot get their hands on sufficient permits…taking us back to the issue of reductions in barriers which have permitted Ryanair/Easyjet etc to do what they do).

    I had seen that – the airlines want to be included in the emissions trading scheme, and be able to buy permits off of each other and other industries in a similar way to slot trading.
    On the other hand there has been much talk in the lead up to the G8 summit, mostly from French and German politicians about taxing either the aviation industry/fuel as a means of providing aid to African countries.

    in reply to: Industry and the future #579128
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    Pressure from the environmental lobby in Europe will grow over the coming years to tax aviation – fuel seems to be their prime target area for tax. You will probably find that Airbus, Boeing and the engine manufacturers will argue for such a tax to be levied on those airlines that use older aircraft that burn more fuel than the newer build aircraft.
    Technology will be developed that will allow the environmental impact of aircraft to be significantly reduced. Take the 787 for instance – the APU will reportedly use fuel cell technology that will allow it to use a small fraction of the amount of fuel used at present to power it.

    Instead of taxing the aviation industry, the EU and EEC should be encouraging companies like RR, GE, Airbus and Boeing to develop the new technologies that will help to make the aviation industry more acceptable to the environmentalists. To achieve this, maybe they could start by using some of the money that goes on the Common Agricultural Policy to research and develop such new technologies.

    In the UK the whole of the transport system needs to be better integrated. For instance the West Coast Main Line Train network should run via LHR, with a high speed link between LHR and Manchester.

    in reply to: aviation fuel..current cost of? #579276
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    Oil currently costs approx $60 USD per barrell – last summer oil was between $35 and 40 per barrell. As fares have not went up becuase of competition, a fuel surcharge is a means of some airlines covering this extra expenditure on fuel.

    in reply to: Is Onur Air a regular at GLA? #584859
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    The DC-9 belongs to the US Navy.

    in reply to: New FlyBe routes next week.. #585672
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    Flybe have a large billboard on the perimiter road to GLA that lists LBA as a destination. I would say the following for winter expansion:

    ABZ to any of the following – BHX/EDI/EXT/GLA/NCL/NWI/SOU.

    LBA to GLA/EDI.

    in reply to: What do First Choice use to cross the pond? #587638
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    All of the FCA long haul programme is now operated on the 767-300.
    The past 2 weeks G-OOAN has been operating the GLA flights.
    Their 767’s have a 62J/196Y seating config – 258 seats in total.
    Seat pitch will not be an issue.

    in reply to: Anti Collision Beacons. #588692
    N5552.0W00425.9
    Participant

    The Anti Col beacon on the Q400 is masked by the engines – if you are on the ground, and either level with or to the rear of the aircraft you can’t see the beacon.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 312 total)