dark light

baloffski

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 206 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British "Crew Chief" designation #1106688
    baloffski
    Participant

    I am pretty sure that USAF have used the system since the days of World War 2 where a Crew Chief has total responsibility for one aircraft and that is why his name appears on the side for the aircraft.

    The USAF has always enjoyed a better manpower to aircraft ratio than the RAF so consequently on a Sqn of say 12 aircraft each would have its own individual Crew Chief and he/she would then have a full team of specialists under his/her command.

    The RAF have always embraced the concept of a centralised manpower core responsible for all of the aircraft on the Sqn. This would be led by an Engineer Officer or two and a WO Eng. There would be a Flt Sgt per shift and before the introduction of the Chief Technician rank, they were always called Chiefy.(The most famous one of course being Chiefy Powell of 617 Sqn fame).

    The Flt Sgt (and later the Chief Tech) would corral his troops and prioritise which aircraft would be worked on and in which order.

    Interestingly RAF Regiment Flt Sgts are still referred to as ‘The Chiefy’ which causes some people confusion, because instead of finding somebody wearing 3 stripes and a propellor, the hapless individual is confronted by 3 stripes and a crown.

    in reply to: Cockpitfest 2010 Wish list #1111611
    baloffski
    Participant

    Ten minutes on the Jetstream Flight Deck taking pictures would be nice!

    in reply to: DeHavilland Sea Vixen At Bruntingthorpe #1114177
    baloffski
    Participant

    Has it lit yet?

    in reply to: Canberra Surveys 3/4 Afghanistan! #1116412
    baloffski
    Participant

    They would be the Martin RB-57 version of the Canberra then.

    Nope, as pointed out to me in very strenuous terms by one of their senior groundcrew when I made the same mistake “RB was Air Force and did recce, we are NASA flying the WB and we do Weather”

    He was quite an excitable chap and was close to incandescant when I kept referring to his aircraft as a Canberra!

    in reply to: Canberra Surveys 3/4 Afghanistan! #1116722
    baloffski
    Participant

    We often used to see ‘Canberras’ with really big engines and very long wings on survey duties in Afghanistan operated by NASA.

    in reply to: Why a Meteor? #1116728
    baloffski
    Participant

    The problems of using the Hawk are probably best illustrated by the rear seater abandoning XX227 over Scotland on 21 Apr 1983.

    If you punch the date and a/c serial into google it should give you a link to the Military Aircraft Accident Summary (I have a PDF copy but have no idea how to upload).

    It appears the engine did flame out and had to be relit, so perhaps the Hawk isn’t suited to testing rocket assisted seats?

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1122662
    baloffski
    Participant

    The thing Tony is talking about is better known as a Hernia Kit. I seem to recall it was invented by a bloke in the RAF who got a fiver for his trouble and everybody now uses them. The inventor must be sick as a parrot when he sees that the likes of AE Tools are selling them for £350!

    Ther used to be a drawing which Stn Workshops used to make these kits so it may be worth having a trawl around and see if you can get one or maybe even somebody has a kit they could loan you. The drawback of course is you have to be able to get at least one fastener out to use it.

    Dzus fasteners are a pain if corroded in, belting them with an impact driver as such is not much use as the way the cam mechanism works means the fastener will go into the panel against the spring pressure and not provide the impact driver with anything to purchase against and turn.

    Fortunately you have time on your side so get all the paint off then let the magic fluid penetrate and do its stuff. When it was a race to get a jet serviceable, out came the drill and off with their heads!

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1124046
    baloffski
    Participant

    Moveable nozzles AND cones? could this be SR-71?

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Nozzle-Indicator-/290442456506?cmd=ViewItem&pt=UK_CPV_Aviation_SM&hash=item439fb82dba

    Or just plain old Mirage?

    in reply to: Advice and Suggestions for new RAF Museum Boss #1125389
    baloffski
    Participant

    Having scanned through his piece in this month’s Flypast where he talks about the impending retirement of VC10, Nimrod and the likelyhood of a TriStar, I would ask him to look into the preservation of at least one example of the one aircraft which has been involved in every aspect of British military action since it was introduced in 1967.

    As far as I am aware there are no plans to preserve even a solitary C130K in this country after their retirement. We missed a trick by not putting a single buy back aircraft in a museum somewhere, the delay in receiving the J model should have been used as a bargaining chip to save one from the shredder.

    There is not now, or ever has been since 1945, a single aircraft type in the inventory that has been in harms way more than Albert. I may be biased but one should be saved and a suitable AV presentation built around it detailing the unparalleled service this aircraft type has given.

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1130233
    baloffski
    Participant

    You sir, are a scholar and a gentleman!

    If you could sneak a rule into one shot, next to a switch to give me an idea of aperture size that would be marvelous.

    Thanks

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1130543
    baloffski
    Participant

    It’s me again!

    Does anyone have a picture of the specific panel highlighted in red on this pic of XL190s cockpit by Dr Strangelove?

    http://i944.photobucket.com/albums/ad281/baloffski/xl190-2.jpg

    It is a Victor K2 Co pilots side panel

    Thanks in advance!

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #1131405
    baloffski
    Participant

    The close up photos are proof perfect that the respray has been very well executed and will keep her looking good (and the metal moth at bay) for many years.

    Well done!

    in reply to: Any ideas what these gauges may be? #1131867
    baloffski
    Participant

    The man who sold it referred to the panel as from a Jetstream 21 perhaps a term used for a development aircraft, but I am drawn to the probability that it is from Culdrose 562/XX483 as put forward by Pagen01.

    My other rationale behind these gauges not being a development mod is the thought, that if during development vibration needed to be monitored closely, then it would probably have been done by a Flight Test Engineer sat ‘down the back’ at a console probably looking at all sorts of engine parameters.

    There is a cracking pic of the FEs desk on the VC10nderness site here:

    http://www.vc10.net/Photos/XV109.html

    Can anyone identify which are the engine vibration gauges?

    Many thanks to all who have expended thinking power on this wee poser so far – the quest continues:confused:

    in reply to: Any ideas what these gauges may be? #1132856
    baloffski
    Participant

    Unfortunately the screws are captive to the panel, tightening a collar arrangement at the back which clamps the gauge in place, so that explains the paint being a good match.

    I am still unconvinced about Astazou engines needing vibration gauges. I even had a look at Dauphin Helicopter cockpit images out there and haven’t seen such gauges (yet?). I imagine rotary would be more reliant on constant vib monitoring so I am still scratching my head!

    in reply to: Any ideas what these gauges may be? #1133732
    baloffski
    Participant

    That was my initial thought but I can’t see why the amplitude of an engines vibration signature would be of any use to a pilot?

    On RB199 engines there is a system that monitors engine vibration, but that simply triggers a CWP warning at a pre-determined threshold. Is the Astazou really so vibration sensitive that you need to monitor in flight?

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 206 total)