dark light

baloffski

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 206 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1064491
    baloffski
    Participant

    Is that a complete front panel and from what mark?

    This could be an ideal project for somebody I know who due to a medical condition has the attention span of a goldfish, so how easy are the bits to find to fill the holes, as it is something we may be able to use as part of his rehabilitation?

    Google is probably my friend for these questions, but I am a bit strapped for time so I am hoping some kind soul will post me some info on here (and at least I will know it is pukka gen)

    Thanks in advance

    in reply to: Honington Buried Treasure? #1078550
    baloffski
    Participant

    I would be very careful about digging on any airfield in the UK. The discovery of ‘significant amounts’ of asbestos at RAF Woodvale recently has forced the famous Woodvale Rally to permanently relocate to Southport. RAF Barnham (coincidently administered from Honnington), was supposed to have been cleared of all chemical weapons in the 1960s. However, a mate of mine on 5131 BD Sqn suffered Mustard Gas Burns having been called into dispose of some shells dug up by contractors in the 1990s.

    in reply to: Identifying Parts From Possible Crash Site #1081027
    baloffski
    Participant

    For my two penn’orth, the key type thing looks like the worm drive off a jubilee clip and the component next to the spring clip, with the holes in looks like a banjo bolt or bleed nipple of some sort.

    If you take the dimples in the kitchen paper as a sort of size reference and the ‘grippers’ in the spring clip I would have that as retainer clip for a fluid line.

    All that brings me to pretty much the same conclusion as DarnSarf – some kind of agricultural spraying kit or a mix of that and old automotive. I would be very surprised if it was aviation related

    in reply to: RAF Propellers X or + #959229
    baloffski
    Participant

    The correct way is vertical cross and usually with number one blade (marked with a black or yellow circle) at the top, especially if the aircraft is to be parked for more than a few hours or any length of time in cold weather conditions. This is to prevent oil getting past the Beta Feedback Shaft Seals. I am reasonably sure this is mentioned in Safety and Servicing Notes and the Prop AP/TOs and there was if I remember rightly a Lockheed Service News article about it.

    The other very good reason for leaving them in + not x is that during your preflight walk around you check that the Prop Brake is working and also the prop and engine are free to rotate. If you leave them in X you have to get a ladder out to do the check. (There was a Flt Engineer known as Micro Eng who had to get a ladder out for the inboards but that is another story).

    The Americans would often use the X though and the only explanation I ever got was it made the aeroplane look sexier.

    in reply to: Ten best-looking British aircraft #965615
    baloffski
    Participant

    HP Victor B1

    Shorts Belfast

    in reply to: Unknown Aircraft Exterior Panel ID #976716
    baloffski
    Participant

    My initial thought was dry bay lid but discounted it hence the cowardly ‘I think it is Lockheed’ statement.

    I discounted it because it looks too new to be pre wing change; and it may be out there but I am struggling to find any reference to the lids being square even pre-modification. That isn’t to say of course that it isn’t a re-manufactured panel, but why would you make a new panel to fit a hole shape that no longer exists?

    I toyed with the idea of J model but can’t find a good enough picture to tell. If the weather turns rubbish I may plough through my old copies of Lockheed Service News to see if there is anything C130 or even Galaxy/Starlifter.

    Of course Albert has been changed many many times by just as many operators. There may still be some A models kicking about, although I think after the fire bomber tragedy they may have been withdrawn.

    in reply to: Unknown Aircraft Exterior Panel ID #978295
    baloffski
    Participant

    It is likely that the panel is from a stressed skin construction wing hence the many big fasteners with high torque loadings. It looks possibly Lockheed to me but I would not bet any large sum on it.

    in reply to: New Spotted For 2012 Season Here #981126
    baloffski
    Participant

    Griffen bimbling over today.

    whats with the “rescue” on the door??

    That is an 84 Sqn cab judging by the Union Flags and what looks a lot like the scorpion badge on the tail (the card suit symbol should be on the other side of the tail).

    Used at Akrotiri for SAR, Under Slung Load, Water Bombing and support to the UN Peacekeepers.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #988122
    baloffski
    Participant

    I really am scraping the deepest of memory barrels here, but I have some memory of the Riggers using this port to do bleed air checks on systems like Anti Ice when the jets were in the hangar for Minor servicing etc. We used to get banished out of the hangar when they were doing cockpit pressurisation checks so I am not sure if they used the same point for that.

    Out on the line it was a quick blat on the Artouste or an engine run, but WO ME(A)S at Marham would have been a bit miffed if we had tried that in one of his hangars.

    It was 1985 though when I last wielded a Handley Page Engine Door Key so don’t take it as a certainty, I struggle remembering what I had for my dinner sometimes these days!

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #990288
    baloffski
    Participant

    Camouflage would be lovely, but surely that would mean the end of the name ‘Lusty Lindy’ as she was christened in ’91 whilst in the Gulf. Could Andy Price’s artwork be retained on a green and grey jet without it looking ‘a bit daft’ and attracting negative comments from the armchair warriors?

    I remember the first Victors to be painted Hemp being referred to as the Flying T*rd because they were brown and pointed at each end by the paint finish purists. I dare say something similar happened when the Nimrod went Hemp. But that is the colour they ended their service in so that must count for something?

    My view is crack on fellas, you do superb work and if you have the paint already it is a no brainer. It would be superb to have one in Hemp, one in Cam and one in White. But as long as it keeps the jet from corroding any colour is fine except pink……………..;).:diablo:

    in reply to: Drop tanks / belly tanks #1017687
    baloffski
    Participant

    Tornado Drop tanks here:

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/EXTERNAL-FUEL-TANKS-TORNADO-/290679241180?pt=UK_CPV_Aviation_SM&hash=item43add539dc#ht_2041wt_754

    Though these are the 1500 ltr versions which are made from Phenolic Asbestos which would be a ****** to cut and may cause some consternation in the H&S world.

    Better the 2250 ltr ‘Big Jugs’ but they are like rocking horse manure. Stainless Steel and a far bit of room in them for a monster engine.

    in reply to: Sqn Numberplates #1017744
    baloffski
    Participant

    No. 1 Balloon Company, Royal engineers are to reform in their centenary year:

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/no1f-squadron-21052012

    It says the official Stand Up will be at what may be the last Leuchars Airshow, which has to be the most bittersweet of double edged swords.

    in reply to: 69 years ago….. #1020028
    baloffski
    Participant

    Per Ardua Ad Astra from a former Hole in the Wall Gang Spanner Monkey with a large Talisker about to be raised.

    in reply to: 69 years ago….. #1029269
    baloffski
    Participant

    Per Ardua Ad Astra from a former Hole in the Wall Gang Spanner Monkey with a large Talisker about to be raised.

    in reply to: VC-10 enthusiast on the move! #1026395
    baloffski
    Participant

    Ive seen C130NAV a few times…

    There is a C130ALM and C130PLT too!

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 206 total)