Ive seen C130NAV a few times…
There is a C130ALM and C130PLT too!
Just out of interest John, is the Avon you have an early ‘cannular’ 100 series or one of the later annular 200/300 series, where is the museum?
With my total pedantic hat firmly seated on my bonce:
Early Avons were Canned or Cannular (you can see the combustors)
Later Avons are Canannular (the combustors are moved inside the engine)
And Annular where the bit between the back of the compressor and front of the turbine is effectively one big combustor, ‘modern’ engines such as the RB199.
Pedant hat off.
The Avon is the stand out gas turbine of all time. First flown in the late 1940s and operational in the first Canberras in the 50s. 62 years on it is still fully supported by Rolls Royce in the gas generator variants for the oil. gas and power generation industries. I think they even ran them on liquified coal dust!
Part of my FT course was blade blending on an Avon and it is a ‘simple’ job as James has described above to remove the Compressor top half casing to expose the Blades. I don’t think you can do anything with the hot end without specialist tools but I could be wrong.
A word of warning though, if you don’t lock the rotating assembly, somebody will put fingers in and turn the Compressor. I know 300 series and think some, if not all the others had an anti rotation brake fitted which meant the engine will only turn one way. What happens is the inertia of the big rotating mass drags fingers in and they get wedged. You can’t turn the engine in the opposite direction because of the stop, so the only way to get the trapped fingers out is to get the bolt croppers out of stores. (I would strongly advise that they are used on the blades not the fingers – however, the preservationist in me thinks otherwise!)
I too am a big fan* of the Avon so would love to see pictures too.
*The Avon was a turbojet not a turbofan before anyone says anytihing!
Those two looking motors will have gyros in them if they are artificial horizons. If they haven’t then they must be remote indicators.
I think they more likely to be Desynn pots/motor drives. One looks to have a torque figure on the label and there is no ‘gyro – handle like eggs’ type warning on either the internal drives or the casing.
It looks very aircraft part, but just to add another penn’orth to my catapult man theory, the small needle could be something to do with making sure that the wind is within limits for launch? Indicates the yaw element on a corkscrewing deck? I will get me coat………..
I may be of on one of my tangents, but is it for take off/launch rather than a landing aid? I confess to knowing little about ships with runways, but I am guessing it would be mostly bad to press the trigger that launches the catapult/aircraft when the boat is nose down? The man that holds the trigger would have a quick shufty at this indicator before releasing the steam just to make sure that they are pointing at sky not water.
The roll sector isn’t marked all the way around which you would kind of expect to see if it was fitted to an aircraft that could roll further than 45 degrees AOB, (which would be mightily scary enough in a big boat but it must happen?)
My three penn’orth anyway!
Was it a manufacturer thing to save the complexity of dual control and instruments? I seem to remember the Vulcan was supposed to be (and the test flights were) single seat ‘up the front’.
Would any of you kind souls have an image of the Stick Shaker Cancel Buttons from a Jetstream T1 LH Instrument panel please? (A part number would be even better but I mustn’t be greedy!)
Thanks in advance!
Would any of you kind souls have an image of the Stick Shaker Cancel Buttons from a Jetstream T1 LH Instrument panel please? (A part number would be even better but I mustn’t be greedy!)
Thanks in advance!
Even if it is an RAF ‘dome it may not have been painted whilst in service.
In the recesses of what I have got left of a memory, I think I recall handing Spencer Flack a red helmet when he was crewing in to G-HUNT. But as it was at a Valley air show in about 80/81 I could be talking complete dirigibles.
All RAF aircrew operate in a mutual support club and if you aren’t cutting it in that club you will soon become a former member of that club. I witnessed many people get chopped at very very late stages in their flying training because they weren’t up to snuff. I have also seen some withdraw themselves because they couldn’t cope. If you take that ethos right to the top of the profession, the Red Arrows have always been the elite section of the club; and have not and I would say will never accept anything except the very very best. So to include a token woman/gay/ethnic minority pilot is beyond belief. She would not have got past her first Cyprus Det let alone 2 years with the team if she wasn’t good enough.
To even get as far as her first selection interview she will have jumped through hoops of fire and been signed off by an awful lot of people who would have safety and competency as their only criteria of approval. Then the AOC has to sign off on every team member and authorises the team to display every season based purely on safety. If during her work up she was not making the grade the axe would have fallen well before the press were told that the first female Reds pilot was inbound. So all this tokenism mumbo jumbo is cobblers IMHO.
Personally, I think that IF the reason she has elected to fly a desk is because of stress, she has shown herself to be in possession of the biggest set of brass ones going. It is not easy on anyone in the armed forces to say that stuff is getting them down – even in these enlightened days, it is just not the done thing. So well done for showing the kind of moral fortitude many will never aspire to.
Thanks Ma’am for providing the world with two years of flying excellence in what is IMHO still the world’s premier aerobatic team.
Now all that aside is it a good or bad thing the Red’s going to 7 this year?
It may help them, as two jets in every display will not be eating fatigue life. This will help the engineers to manage the rate effectively across the fleet and in effect make the jets last longer. Don’t forget these aircraft are 30 odd years old now and with probably no hope of replacement when they get to lifex, so dropping to seven could well prolong the life of the team in its current guise.
There is however the spectre of a beancounter post Olympics and the Jubilee saying “The RAFAT is an unnecessary expense and we are canning it”. Cue public outrage blah blah, Cameron steps in and says “not on my watch” And the team is reduced to 7 permanently to save a lot of political face in front of the populace, and the beancounter gets his pound of flesh in return.
How do you think the future looks?
It makes my pee boil when I read that an aircraft such as this has to be moved out of an MOD owned hangar because the rent is prohibitive. The way I see it is as long as there is no cost to the public purse, something this big and of such huge local interest and historical importance that is being saved for the nation, should be allowed to occupy what in all likelihood given the draw down pre Army will be an empty space rent free.
As tax payers we ‘own’ the hangar and I very much doubt even the most die hard skinflint would begrudge a bit of free floorspace until the Army are ready to park their 10 ton trucks in there. Take the fuses out of the supply and turn the heating off to absolutely make sure that no public money is being expended if need be, but don’t tow the jet out of the shed until you have to – not because rent forces you to.
Not so very long ago the Station Commander could make the decision that this would be a project which would be of great benefit to promoting the military to the public. The PR (in this case probably worldwide) would be superb and Harry the Staish would have been one step closer to his/her OBE. Win Win situation all round.
This renting out of public property is driven purely by faceless beancounters who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
That is my Monday rant done -thanks for your indulgence!
Saints was a Marmite posting – you either loved the place dearly or hated it with a passion.
I was ‘fortunate’ enough to only do my driving course and RB199 off aircraft course there, but what I saw of 8 Sqn (Engine Repair and Overhaul Sqn better known as EROS) made me shudder with fear when we were taken around it.
The visit started in the Cleaning Plant which was the closest thing I have ever seen to Dante’s Inferno. we walked along an elevated walkway between colossal vats of hot degreasing fluid with components on a huge conveyor being dipped in and out of them.
Next was a bay where engines were stripped and components were then passed to Inspection. It was here I met an old mate of mine, who had delivered to him in the morning a basket containing 1000 turbine blades which he had to examine for any obvious failures and then either put in the scrap bin or send off for Non Destructive Testing. After lunch he had another thousand blades delivered.
I don’t know if there is any truth in it but he said that EROS had the highest
incidence of mental health issues in the RAF! whether this was the work or the fumes from the cleaning plant I wouldn’t like to say.
There was only a small RAF contingent in there and apart from my mate they seemed quite happy with their lot. There was a large number of civilian staff and a fair few of these were Rolls Royce Field Service Reps. The lady who worked the tea bar was known as the Bristol’s rep but I am not sure it was anything to do with Bristol Aeroengines……..
After my mate got a move to Tornado Major servicing on 10 Sqn he became a die hard fan of Saints and when they shifted the Majors out, he pulled the pin and went to work for GE.
St Athan used to be the epicentre of aircraft deep maintenance in the RAF at one time and the last servicing is a sad milestone.
Cosmoline is the stuff a lot of C stores such as nuts and bolts etc came packed in as a preservative. I never saw it used on anything bigger probably because it was a wretch to remove. If you can imagine really thick and sticky Castrol GTX. The Anhydrous Lanolin came out of the tube like toothpaste, though I think you could order pre-mixed.
The good thing about Cosmoline was you could scrape it out of the bag to ‘glue’ nuts in when working in difficult places to stop the nut falling out of the socket and ending up in the most awkward place on the aircraft.
Back in the annals of time when I did my FT at Halton; one of the last phases was Preservation and Packing, where, after the inevitable death by OHP, the practical section was inhibiting a Gnome engine on a stand and then putting it in an MVP bag. After wrapping each pipe in miles of green polythene we then had to spray the green stuff on; and as I recall it was referred to as Anhydrous Lanolin. It came in a tube and it was thinned down for spraying using lots of Avtur.
When we finished doing that and had sealed the engine in a MVP Bag (using the daft zip system which provoked more bad language than any other kit I ever used) we had to take them out, and you guessed it – strip all the lanolin off with Avtur and take all the tape off ready for the next course. We were all like gardeners for a week after that phase with bright green fingers.
PX9 rings a bell – but it was 1985!
Is the 1940 related to the year of manufacture not the year of issue? In that case it may have been manufactured in 1940 but the actual issue date could be ’41 or a very long shot of 1942, worth a thought I guess.
If you do think it belonged to an Officer, a trawl through the Air Force List for those years in the National Archive may throw something up perhaps?