I always wanted a Goblin Teasmaid but the Mrs put a stop to that!
Seriously though, as an ex engine basher on all sorts of Gas Turbs, I reckon anything which has burner cans on the outside just says raw power even though they were soon left in the weeds thrustwise.
It was the end of flying ops at Lyneham today and a very sad day not only for Fat Albert but the RAF as a whole. Never having the romantic attachment for many people that Battle of Britain fighter stations do, it nevertheless has a rich history as this short clip from the BBC shows:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-13987771
Shutting an airfield that has two runways and moving vital transport ops to a location with one and history of closing for fog is folly in the extreme.
End of an era, start of an error in my opinion.
Chaps,
I am the first to admit that I have the attention span of a goldfish with ADHD and there are some long old explanations up ther. I wonder could some kind soul do a quick bullet brief as to what has happened and what outcome you are fighting for please.
That way I can send a concise email to the right people and say the right things rather than blunder in with my size 11s!
There was an article in the Telegraph about something similar:
I am not sure the days of a plastic laminated A4 sheet where damp has got into the edges and around the staples; showing a fuzzy picture and list of performance figures with a brief description, are over just yet.
One of the difficulties of tech which uses the visitor’s own gadget is the variety of platforms and their performance. F’rinstance I am a BlackBerry user so an iPhone App is no good to me, but I am told that the BlackBerry QR code recognition knocks the Apple into a cocked hat. Some people are hell bent on Android; but let us not forget the many many users of non smart tech.
Earpieces connected to a low power radio station can be a bit hit and miss due to atmospherics affecting the AM broadcasts. If there is a decent surveilance radar running anywhere near you will get a blip every rotation and there is always the chance of an earful of white noise during ATC/Pilot radio talk. That said I have used them within sports venues where IMHO they enhanced the event considerably.
Price needs to drop dramatically before this sort of kit is available to anyone without an Arts Council grant to give the man from Apple/Adobe/Google/RIM etc champagne and canapes. But bring it on I say, whatever it takes to get people engaged and leave with a better knowledge gets my vote every time.
Everybody was surprised at just how well the tankers had fared, the assumption was that they would have been very well used and abused and fit for nowt when they came home.
However, the first one back was subjected to a thorough tear down inspection and found to be in better nick than any of the rest of the fleet.
I am pretty certain that the first three tankers back were given a big refurbishment by Marshalls and sold on to the Sri Lankans. I am not sure if the refurbished versions which were sold to the Austrians were ex tankers.
This will give you an idea of how valuable C130 is in the global market. The killer for the C130K fleet has been lifex wingboxes and there is a world shortage of spare ones. If there were any available at less than stupid amounts of money we wouldn’t be having this conversation as new wingboxes would have given probably 20 years extra life.
I am led to believe that there was even a plan to strip the short J wingboxes out to fit to the Mk 3A Ks at one point, but that really set the cat amongst the pigeons.
Back on the topic of TriStar preservation, if I had my way Marshalls would be commanded by act of parliament to maintain in perfect nick at least one TriStar, as remuneration for the amount of money they have fleeced from the MOD on converting and upgrading over the years. That and the amount of days wasted in theatre by troops coming home after getting shot at for 6 months, caused by the delay in getting a jet out of Marshalls post servicing/upgrade. But don’t get me started on that!
Pah! Get some op time in shiney fleet!
The first troops that deployed on Op Banner in 1969, did so in Fat Albert (a mere toddler at just two years old). I flew my last Banner run in 2007 just as the op was finally declared over.
I would love to see lots of Hercules preserved all over this country as we owe it a huge debt as a nation, but the harsh reality is Lockheed’s finest is still very sought after and bits of it are VERY valuable to Military and Civil operators. If you consider the money spent on the flight deck alone in the last ten years on upgrades, a full spares recovery programme is very lucrative indeed.
A very sad end to a mighty servant, but these are the times we live in.
Try looking for a flight number beginning with RR or Ascot. That would denote air trooping flights though if it was a cargo flight I can’t offer any similar suggestions.
With the exception of some aeromed and JGN (if they are still running) all RAF C130 callsigns (freight or pax) with four figures after Ascot/RR are either 4 or 5 depending on the mark of aircraft so Ascot 4xxx would be a Mk1 or 5 and Ascot 5xxx would be a stretch (3 or 4). If it is a 3 figure number after Ascot it is a UK internal flight.
If memory serves 2xxx is VC10, 3xxx TriStar/C17 and 1 is 32 (TR), but I am more than happy to be corrected there, as I was never shiney fleet.
The 10B is fitted to the Hawk T1 and the 16A to the Typhoon
Hi Baloffski, was it the same thing picture above at Brooklands? I had a feeling that it was a one off.
The picture EXMPA has posted shows the beast as I knew it. If you can imagine two long jetpipes with the ends flattened, you have roughly what it looked like from the front; as opposed to the Farnborough one, which appears to be one jetpipe with the efflux directed sideways through ducts.
I can confirm that the Cottesmore MRD in the mid eighties was a pair of Derwents and I hated and feared running them in equal proportions. Sat in a ‘garden shed’ between two ancient jets was no picnic and even though you had massive heat sources within arms length, piggin’ cold!!
It seemed like every winter the 1600 hrs Tannoy message across the station only changed from Blacktop Standdown to 2 hours notice only ever occured when I was duty MRD Bod. I was called out for real three times and sat in my shed for 4 hour stints was no fun. Even the delight in burning Bowser clutches out for an early knock off lost its sparkle when the MTO threatened to charge the driver and the operator the next time it happened.
We were never allowed on tarmac because it would be a molten mass at the far end of the runway by the time we finished. We even had to be careful on concrete as it was easy to blow the bitumen filleting out.
They were decommissioned in about ’89 I think and I seem to recall the lads in Prop Flight sectioned at least onE Derwent for display and I think another was painted and chromed also for display.
Shrapnel damge was indeed the reason behind the trip home in a C17. We went over to have look at it before it was shipped home and it needed more than filler…….Speed tape maybe :rolleyes:
Better known as Christine or that F$%^&* B*£^&*” Jet.
Every type has it’s rogue jet and this is the Harrier fleets. I know some lineys that refused to work on it alone because of its ability to draw blood in a big way. A bit inconvenient as it was usually U/S for some reason or other.
It suffered its fair share of mishaps too including I am pretty sure, suffering quite a lot of damage ‘overseas’ resulting in a C17 ride home and an incident with a jack which led to an extended repair scheme.
I take it you have seen this:
http://www.liverpoolblitz70.co.uk/
And this:
http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/nof/blitz/
and finally this:
http://www.yoliverpool.com/forum/showthread.php?50893-THE-BLITZ&highlight=liverpool+blitz
I will be down watching the parade etc on Saturday so if there is anything specific I may be able to help with drop me a PM
Also of use for bulling boots!
Ahem! You may think that Prime Minister; i couldn’t possibly comment!
That is quite an abrupt reply, but hey ho it wouldn’t do for us all to be the same.
Di-electrics are the actual transmitter/receiver ‘aerial’ bit of a system, f’rinstance Doppler, which is quite low powered.
Whereas radomes are in essence a lump of airframe made out of material which allows the passage of radio waves.
Tornado GMR/TFR are high powered transmitters and ‘paint’, or in this case rubberised Flexane type coating will not hinder the output.