dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1790540
    matt
    Participant

    sferrin, as per the head of DRDO, Dr. Saraswat, the Pradyumna BMD missile has slightly better performance than the Patriot PAC-3 :

    The AAD-02 was slightly better than the PAC-3 (Patriot Advanced Capability) of the U.S. in terms of range and altitude. The direct hit compared very well with the PAC-3 in terms of accuracy.

    Avinash Chander, Director, Advanced Systems’ Laboratory (ASL), Hyderabad, said, “I don’t think any country [other than India] was able to achieve a direct-hit in the first attempt” in endo-atmosphere.

    Reference :-

    http://www.hindu.com/2007/12/07/stories/2007120761241800.htm

    Having spent all that money to deploy this system India would still not be the better for it as I am sure China has enough missiles in its arsenals NOW to saturate any BMD India might put up in the future to come.

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1790542
    matt
    Participant

    Hercules and Hawk were both knocking down short range missiles in the 60s. In the 90s the Marines had modified Hawk to do the job even better. Still though, it’s a start. It is amusing though to hear people go on about how Pakistan needs to worry because India now has missile defenses, but at the same time the US’s is ineffective. 😉

    Well I was and am one of the ones that think the US BMD is counter productive, as for Indias well i dont think it will make matters any better considering our wonderful neighbour to the north, east and west i think this would be a counter productive move.

    Actually it has already proven to be counter productive for India, with India joining the BMD bandwagon at a time when Russia could have done with its support back in the late 90’s and early 2000.

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1790551
    matt
    Participant

    Hmm yup sorry Nike had a longer range than this.

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1790560
    matt
    Participant

    Well India has only just started to make its foray into BMD, so it could be 2 things that have happened.

    1) The reporter has put 1+2 together that got 4
    2) India is just starting at the level where USSR and USA were in the last century with there tactical AD systems

    so who actually knows!

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1790612
    matt
    Participant

    Nuclear-Capable Akash Missile Test-Fired

    (Source ddi Indian Government news; issued Dec. 14, 2007)

    On the heels of conducting trials of interceptor missiles, India on Thursday revived its surface-to-air nuclear-capable Akash missile programme by carrying out its fresh test firing near Balasore.

    The multi-target missile with a strike range of 25 kms and capable of carrying a nuclear warhead of 50kg was test fired from a mobile launcher, defence sources said.

    The missile targeted a flying object using Pilotless Target Aircraft (PTA) “Lakshya” as support system, they said, adding the PTA was flown at 11.36 hrs and “Akash” missile test-fired at around 11.55 am from the ITR.

    For the next ten days, a series of test firings of the missile would be carried out to pave the way for its induction into the Indian Air Force.

    IAF had not been satisfied by performance of the missile in earlier test firings and this had led to Government clearing a deal to procure ground-to-air missiles from Israel.

    The trial was carried out to fine-tune the sophisticated missile, though Akash has undergone several tests earlier as part of the country’s Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme (IGPMD), sources said.

    The Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL) at Hyderabad, the nodal agency which designed the missile, has also approved its “flight consistency”, they said.

    The 5.6-metre-long missile weighing about 700 kg uses an integral “ramjet” rocket propulsion system and has a low reaction time.

    The Akash missile operates in conjunction with the indigenously built “Rajendra” surveillance and the engagement radar being developed by Hyderabad-based Electronic Research and Development Establishment (ERDE), sources said.

    The radar is capable of tracking 64 targets and guide up to 12 missiles simultaneously.

    Comparable to the US-made “Patriot”, the Akash missile has better features and it is completely mobile with capability to be launched from a battle tank too, they said.

    During its entire flight, the thrust is maintained and the propulsion works till the missile hits the target.

    Akash was initially designed as an anti-aircraft missile, but scientists from Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) were presently working to re-configure it as an “anti-missile” missile, sources said.

    -ends-

    in reply to: Engine for LCA? #2538242
    matt
    Participant

    Too much emphasis is placed these days on computer simulation, people seem to forget real engineering involves practical and physical testing and analysis and understanding and is not the case of sitting days on end at a terminal crunching numbers.
    I don’t think we can tell from a line art whether an aircraft is aerodynamically challenged or not however if the old adage “if it looks good, it will fly good” does come true more often than not and I do tend to think that the rectangular tube that is the fuselage of the LCA has been chosen to try and fit in as much in terms of payload as possible in the worlds “smallest combat aircraft”
    It would not be beyond the realms of reality that it was decided that the range and hence the internal carrying capacity of the fuselage and wing were more important for this small aircraft than being able to shout that you can reach MACH 2
    No modern design can be a pure breed capable of all things perfectly.

    Compromise Compromise and then Compromise some more

    in reply to: Upgraded Iranian F-14As #2550190
    matt
    Participant

    Doe the Phoenix missiles in Irans stock still work? Have they managed to reverse engineer those too?

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2550197
    matt
    Participant

    Does this mean someone has got a large backhander?

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2550350
    matt
    Participant

    USAF should scrap overpriced junk like C-5 and C-17 and buy An-124 and IL-76 MF. 😀

    you could add to that the A400M and C 130J

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2550353
    matt
    Participant

    What part of the getup turns it from a Military transport to a Spec ops ? Will it have a Howitzer or mortors on it or something similar?

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2550536
    matt
    Participant

    India may need to be a part of the project just to make sure it is not sold to the chinese.. pure and simple.

    but is their any real info on the PAK FA

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2551744
    matt
    Participant

    The key part for me is the last part of the report on the C 130J I remember that even the US were not very happy with the C 130J and its extra costs, but since their was no replacement (viable) at the time i guess they stuck with it.

    It caused a lot of controvarsy

    in reply to: Composite artillery projectile #1792265
    matt
    Participant

    this is just the silliest thing i have heard.. they are just making matters worst and its a classic case of trying to “fix wot aint broke”.

    Composite shells = more trouble and inspections etc etc etc to make sure the shell wont break up at the wrong time.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2504676
    matt
    Participant

    But what happened to the MMRCA contract? :S

    matt
    Participant

    Well If the Germans and the French want to buy an MI-26T to match the capabilities of the MV-22 then I think its a good buy and a very logical buy. If the Marines can argue for a non autorotating two rotor heavy lift system that needs perfect weather to fly then i dont see anything wrong with an European upgraded MI-26T.

    Beatings going through the pain of a A400M type scenerio.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 3,292 total)