dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,816 through 1,830 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LCA #2564387
    matt
    Participant

    As I use an old wet film Canon AE1 I was thinking of going over to a digital EOS as well. This is really for the photograpy sub forum but does anyone have any views on the EOS?

    which eos?

    in reply to: RIAT RAF Fairford Vid. #2565378
    matt
    Participant

    yes!

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2568018
    matt
    Participant

    how are the radars and engines doing?

    in reply to: Fuji Film S3 Pro #461151
    matt
    Participant

    see everyone keeps saying this,

    i want to do landscapes and to be fair i do more macro, landscapes fine art and portraits then i do air displays.

    i have a yashica TLR which i can use with velvia for landscapes but the whole business of slides just puts me off and i want to have something close that is relatively all round.

    just read review for the fuji on amatuer photographer they compared it to the D200 nikon they say the same as dpreview the detail is only kept up at the highlights not the shadows i think about 2 stops in the highlights.

    so doesnt seem like worth spending the money and changing the lense system. i am in love with my tamron sp 90mm macro and dont want to loose it. i think i shall get the 30D seems they have really improved the metering with this beast.

    in reply to: F-22A against Super Flanker #2569179
    matt
    Participant

    maybe we will know soon enough. i am sure the Americans would love to put this beast up against both the F/A-18 subpar horner, Typhoon and the SuperFlanker and since the only other country apart from china which has aircraft close to this is india maybe we can expect a few outings for both AC.

    IT would make sence for the games to go ahead if they wanted to fully use the F-22A.

    in reply to: Canon EOS Digital SLR – Which Model ? #461281
    matt
    Participant

    I just bought a cheap 20D last week. The 30D is using the same sensor as the 20D, so the only major differences are a better raw buffer for the 30D, and a larger display on the back. For me these weren’t inportant issues as I could get me a new cheap 20D. BW Roger

    Aint that simple, check out this months pratical photography or photography monthly or something they have a review on the 30D it does produce better images.

    in reply to: F-22A against Super Flanker #2569837
    matt
    Participant

    Why may a typhoon stand a chance and not the Su-35?

    dont mind me i dont think a Su-35 OR Typhoon would stand a chance but i am intrigued by your comment.

    in reply to: F-22A against Super Flanker #2569853
    matt
    Participant

    SOPWITH CAMEL

    in reply to: Fuji Film S3 Pro #461283
    matt
    Participant

    i have read the reviews and i have played with the 20D before.. the S3 just seems to be better for lanscapes

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2572771
    matt
    Participant

    Arms Americana: US opens military barn door for IndiaAdd to Clippings
    Chidanand Rajghatta
    [ Tuesday, May 09, 2006 09:48:48 pmTIMES NEWS NETWORK ]
    RSS Feeds| SMS NEWS to 8888 for latest updates

    ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI: In a military and arms sales career spanning three decades, Michael Devers seldom had India on his radar — until 2005. A senior executive with Boeing’s Integrated Defence Systems (IDS), the lesser-known arms division of the giant airplane maker, Devers traveled far and wide– Korea, Japan, Middle-East, Australia -‘ hawking the latest American military wares to US’ allies and friends. But rarely ever to India, which resolutely bought arms from the Moscow, Washington’s Cold War rival, and Europe.

    Then one day it began changing. Early last year, a top Boeing executive received a phone call from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s office. The US was going to finally clear the sale of F-16s (made by Boeing’s rival-in-arms Lockheed Martin) to Pakistan. But the Secretary was keen to offer India more advanced F-16s and even newer Boeing-made F/A-18 Super Hornets in keeping with the strategic shift in the region. Was Boeing prepared for that?

    “We were all stunned,” another Boeing executive, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the exchanges, recalled. “This is a new generation combat aircraft that we have not sold to our closest allies. Outside the US Navy, no one has it. Yet here was the Secretary asking if we were ready to sell to India and also ready for joint production.” Boeing’s reply was swift: Sure thing.

    In mid-March 2005, Rice traveled to New Delhi for what would only later be revealed as a path-breaking visit ‘ of the kind Henry Kissinger made to Beijing in 1970. Amid a raft of issues that would dramatically redefine US strategic interests in Asia, Rice not only sounded out Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on the nuclear deal, but also suggested India not be too worried about US supply of F-16s to Pakistan because India could have its pick of US arms from here on.

    The US was keen on a whole new security architecture in the region, a goal that was written into a ten-year military pact signed by the two defense establishments in June when Pranab Mukherjee visited Washington.

    Two weeks after the Rice visit, Philip Zelikow, her policy advisor in the State Department, summed up the tectonic shift in US policy in the following words: “(The US) goal is to help India become a major world power in the 21st century. We understand fully the implications, including military implications, of that statement.”

    The statement was music to the ears for the folks at Boeing, and indeed, every other American arms maker such as Raytheon, Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics. It was also the sound of cash registers ringing. Long out of bounds for America’s notorious “military-industrial” complex for a variety of reasons, including sanctions, New Delhi had been fertile stomping ground for Russian and European arms dealers for years. Suddenly, Washington had thrown open the barn door and Americans could get into the scrimmage — with, as some US firms like Boeing believe, far greater traction and advantage.

    The reason for US relaxation of arms sales to India is clearly as much commercial as strategic. India’s defense expenditure has climbed steadily over the past few years, current standing at $ 20 billion a year.

    Although that’s only a fraction of the $ 460 billion US spends and a quarter of China’s $ 80 billion, it is expected to keep increasing as India looks to fulfill its potential role as a global power. In fact, India’s defense expense is abysmally low when looked at in per capita terms (where Israel is by far the highest).

    With each increase in India’s defence budget, there has been a frisson of excitement in the world’s arms bazaar as New Delhi has tried to upgrade its military.

    No single item caused more animation in 2005 than the announcement that the Indian Air Force was looking for 126 Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) to supplement its fleet, where the mainstay is the aging and disaster-stricken MiGs. And the ripple reached as far as St.Louis, Missouri, a once-great Midwestern city –home to Boeing’s IDS and the center of its F/A-18 Super Hornet manufacturing facility — that is a pale shadow of its former self. And it was to St Louis that the Indian media from Washington was press-ganged (we joked) last week for a surprising sales pitch.

    in reply to: F-22 jammed canopy #2586745
    matt
    Participant

    This is sad.

    you have to laugh at it but i feel for the guys designing it.

    in reply to: How would you bring down a B-2? #2588831
    matt
    Participant

    bloomin Elle, still worried about the B2 7 pages after the theoretical war started while an aircraft carrier just parked it self in your neighborhood and is firing cruise missiles and aircraft from its deck are pounding your men?

    Failed leadership. Go for the carrier!

    i love the circular arguments are great.

    in reply to: F-22 makes airshow debut. #2594333
    matt
    Participant

    i hope it comes to farnborough or riat this year, or even biggin hill! its the least you yanks can do for making us watch the cashprey (osprey get it? hmm oki not funny).. :S

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2595654
    matt
    Participant

    The United States has successfully employed “part time” pilots in reserve and “Air National Guard” units since the end of WWII.

    There is no reason why an Indian Air Force fighter pilot couldn’t fly for Air India as well.

    too my understanding a lot of the friendly fire insidents have involved the “Air national Gaurd” .. That kind of trigger happy attitude in a zone as hot as the sub continent could lead to major nuke exchanges relatively quickly.

    The part time trigger happy jocks work for the US because if they make a mistake they have an immense oceon to hide behind..

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2598354
    matt
    Participant

    I do have add that this report should be taken seriously by the IAF and they should do something about recruitment let pilots retire early keep a few to train and let the others go off and do what they want after 7 years.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,816 through 1,830 (of 3,292 total)