Why after working on the Mig 1.4X airframes would they go back to the Mig-29 9.1X airframes ? It makes very little sence.
Why do you have a map of India with its industries? I can understand IPCL but GFSC isnt that a fertilizer company? Excuse my ignorance but the last time I checked Gujurat Fertilisers was doing research in Genetic modification (the last time i checked) and they produce wonderful YELLOW WATERMELONS instead of the red but that still does not come close to AVIATION.
Same as the above, and why does the writer have the JSF in the same level as the F/A-22? If the writer means advance technology then I can understand,but then the MCA should not be in that list, since its not even at prototype stage.
Why is the M2k in the air superiority role? i thought the M2k was a bomber first that was later converted to multirole/fighter later on.
Didnt they do a flight or something with the 101 and found that its safty margin is a lot better then anything else ? They are testing it for presidentian operations or something arent they?
Why do the US sell so many military aircraft then? Why not buy European, Russian, or even Chinese? Seem funny that the American Military doesn’t suffer from these issues.
For one even with the Bad customer service US firms are sadly miles ahead of others in terms of weapons tech and R&D it seems.
Secondly I cant asnwer why the US Military doesnt suffer. but the “you take what we give you” mentallity is very prominant in US companies (although I do realise that this is a generalisation and most probably not true for all US companies, rationallity however suggests that since i have not experience different its the only thing i can say)
and what is that based on?
experience of colleagues and also attitudes found from US aviation companies.
Well i tried to find an strong point, everything cannot be so bad!!!!!!
US is one of the worst for service.
But the Us industry has an strong point…POST SALE SERVICE!!!!…
WHAT ? huh ? US industry post sale service is one of the worst in the world.
The Mariner UAV would probably be linked into the MMA system also.
i think had they been given an oppaturnity sukhoi would have been drooling over it as well..something like 45 bill development and estimated 200 bill procurment over 3 decades.
One can only dream of what Sukhoi or Mig could come up with if they were given this kind of money..
Why bother with the Seaking? its a old helo that is being put to grave by the RN and if they are getting rid of them then you can assume they have no use at all. To carrying on believing that India should keep buying RN is just silly. Get rid of them, invest in bigger Dhruv if need be.
Yep but I dont collect such things its was posted on BRF a while back you could ask them again on the Su-30 thread, when it comes back online.
hmm i guess ill have to dive into that pit, just hope its not wishfull thinking by one of the members.
The same awefully old composites will go into the MKI program around the time that the HAL production matures..
Do you have any sources for use of composites on the MKI ? just out of interest.
Thanks Arthur. It was deleted before. I think that since the start of the LCA India has made huge progress.
They will start assembling much complexer fighters like MKI.
you mean “much more complex fighters” dont you? instead of complexer? and you do mean much more capable then complex dont you? since the electronics in the MKI are bought partly over from the LCA and Materials wise the LCA is a bit more Advance then the Su-30’s
Do they need a plane that is late and not the latest? The LCA has profitted a lot from open markets (western technology) but I don’t think they should go on but lift with a newer model with Russia.
Sorry not trying to be pedantic but could you reword that part as it is hard to read.
even as a low tech (low high tech combination) I would serious think twice. Why just getting it into service? Just for the pride?
As a Low tech fighter in a high lo combination it would do very badly since its not that much lower tech then the Su-30’s again apart from the radar most of the avionic back bones are the same.
Matt, Tailfree mig29? That plane is an airsuperiority fighter. I don’t think they will move some control surfaces. I don’t think the B2 or other flying wings are famous when it comes to air to air combat.
Oh yeah i guess the B2 not being famous for air to air combat is a shame.
Specially since its a bomber and has a wing span long enough to match a B1 or something just as big.
and who said a flying wing? i said tailfree Mig-29, that wouldnt make it a flying wing.