IAF chief to visit France
IAF chief to visit France
RAJAT PANDIT
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ MONDAY, MARCH 29, 2004 11:18:09 PM ]
NEW DELHI: IAF chief Air Chief Marshal S Krishnaswamy will leave for France this week to discuss the possible acquisition of additional multi-role Mirage-2000 fighters to bolster India’s ageing air combat fleet.
The IAF chief’s five-day visit from April 3 is being described as a ‘‘goodwill’’ visit. Sources said the French proposal to sell the Mirage-2000-V jets to India is bound to figure in the high-level talks.
India has already finalised the acquisition of 10 Mirage-2000-V jets from Qatar, which wants to sell them off. But the French proposal is to sell 18 Mirage-2000-Vs off-the-shelf to IAF, followed by licensed production of 108 in India.
With the indigenous LCA expected to be ready only after 2010 and the older MiG variants being phased out, the IAF is desperate to acquire some frontline fighters.
‘‘The French proposal for 126 jets is being considered. The solution for force level depletions have, perforce, to be based on import or licensed manufacture of aircraft, both of European and Russian origin,’’ said a source.
Though two squadrons of the Sukhoi-30MKIs have now become operational in the IAF and HAL is gearing up to manufacture 140 of these ‘‘air dominance’’ jets under licensed production, the IAF is also keen on ‘‘smaller’’ fighters like the Mirage-2000-Vs.
:confused: So they send a lump of metal and silicon to orbit the moon, 30 years after other countries have done it..
This is where the comment that the UK cant fight any major wars without US backing comes into prominance.
Its foolish
FOOLISH
and FOOLISH
Originally posted by BuffPuff
Hmm..This comparison would make more sense if, and only if the F-16’s are equipped with AMRAAM’s (or eqiv.). If not, then I’d say the SU-30 will have a rather big advantage.
Better tell the Indian Airforce and the PAF that the cant fight a war since, the F-16’s might not be equiped with AMRAAM’s.
:confused:
Well i thought it was pretty big news that two former cold war oponents would do joint exercises for the first time.
It could also mean exercises with other European countries.
But their are always a few who would opose so i offered to take it off.
How would they use the Kamov’s ?
Mi-35 choppers now become more lethal
RAJAT PANDIT
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ SUNDAY, MARCH 28, 2004 02:32:22 AM ]
SURATGARH: India ‘s only dedicated attack helicopter, the Russian-origin Mi-35, can now wage war round-the-clock.
The massive project to upgrade these lethal helicopter gunships with advanced Israeli night-fighting capabilities and avionics is on the verge of completion.
“It’s a quantum jump…we can now acquire and fire at night. The idea is to enhance the night-flying capabilities of our entire helicopter fleet,” said Air Vice Marshal Sudhir Sah of the IAF’s Western Air Command.
Added a young pilot, “Mi-35s are the baap (father) of the US army’s Apache helicopters and Pakistan ‘s Cobra gunships…they are the best in the world.”
Quipped another, “Even Sylvester Stallone will now find it difficult to evade these helicopters like he did in the Rambo flicks. We can now use the stealth of darkness.”
Enthusiasm apart, the Mi-35s certainly look formidable with their wide array of armaments and cluster bombs. These include “Shturm” radio-guided supersonic anti-tank guided missiles, 80 mm rockets, 23 mm cannons and nose-mounted four-barrelled 12.7 mm gatling guns.
And now, with the Israeli upgrade, two Mi-35s can even stop an advancing enemy tank brigade right on its tracks, said officers of the frontline 104 “Firebirds” squadron based here.
The “One-O-Four”, incidentally, is celebrating its golden jubilee this year.
The upgrade of IAF’s other Mi-35 squadron, the 125 “Gladiators” based in Pathankot, is also near completion.
Sources said the upgradation package of the Mi-35s, acquired by India in 1990-91, signed with the Israeli Aircraft Industries is upwards of $20 million.
The package includes “digital-optronic stabilised payload assemblies”, with forward-looking infra-red TV cameras and laser-range finders, navigation systems and multi-mission computers.
not really a UCAV, a drone or a missile but ucav .. would it not have to survive the attack?
If you read the other thread on the GTRE it says that India had been working on the offer, and i dont see how it could hurt working on the PAKFA and the JSF
I wonder if India is really aloud to join this project..
It was interesting but i got put of by all the acronyms and stuff..
ah well live and learn, had i bothered i would have realised that the us had something similar to a Hellfire armed predator so long ago.
The EF might have a lead/head start, but i have to Agree with SRbin on this in that ultimately it will be the JSF with the greatest export number, and also value (if their are any upgrades etc..).
well its know that this should be replacing the F-16’s so how many F-16’s sold and need to be replaced.. (block 50+ dont count as i hope no one would be crazy enough to pay out so much to replace them early)
:confused:
If they dont go for the Storm shadow or SCALP they would be pretty crazy.
Considering that no one really knows anything about the J-10 what would be worth commenting on? Does it require a high percentage of GCI input ?? does it use a system similar to the gripen allowing networking ? is it more like the modern day Mig-29 ? what are the Avionics?
I want to know what handle the writer of the Original AFM article goes by on this forum, their are some things id love to ask him.
As for the F-7’s nose cone debate, its not completely imposible for the CAC’s to (re) engineer a larger air intake and facilitate a bigger radar.
But if this is all true and the F-7 is on par with F-16’s (performance wise, excess thrust, phi dot, etc etc) then what would be the mud mover ? the FC-1 or the F-7