dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,881 through 2,895 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by seahawk
    matt,

    nice data about the Tungsta, but the range given is only viable in a desert enviroment that offers no natural cover. Add some hills or trees or buildings and the range against a good flown AH in nap of the earth is virtually more then 2-3 kms. And even then getting a lock on will be hard.

    I once had a chnace to witness to german PAH-1 helicopters surprising a US Army SAM Battery. The helos remained undetected until they showed themselves 300m from the SAM site.

    But as I said, the most important factor in that equitation is the terrain. If the terrain offers cover an helo has a good chance to remain undetected from ground based systems, if it is a terrain without cover, then the helo is much more in danger.

    I presume that any Indian drive into Pakistan would happen in the desert areas, as they offer less cover for the defender and alow the Indians to use their superior engagement range, the AH-1s would be facing a serious threat.

    Also I think that the main threat will be the Phalcons and IAF fighters. Especially as Indian fighters equipped with modern BVR missiles can egange the helos without entering the threat envelope of manpads and other light air defences.

    Hi, yeah the given range would be ideal one. On the other hand apart from the desert their are not that many places the tanks could cross. since theirs no point in sending in the AH1’s wheres theirs no armour i presume a good range, you do have a good point about the trees and all though …

    matt
    Participant

    triple can u please stop it already its not even funny.. the helo pics are nice but get rid of the other stuff..

    Pinaka never met up to the requirements of the army (oki so they kept changing them ) and the Dhruv is still to be kitted out fully.

    Aditya could you please tell me where the comanche part is on the export list ?

    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by aditya
    An interesting link:

    http://pmdtc.org/CONGNOTIFY.HTM

    I found this particularly interesting:

    Aditya hi, can you please tell me where about it is on the page i found lots of information about M113 and so on that the US want to sell but i cant find that particular link. please help.

    thank you in advance.

    in reply to: Kondor-E + Yakhont/Brahmos #2659280
    matt
    Participant

    contour mapping to attack shipping?

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2659302
    matt
    Participant

    plug and play ?? wait are you talking bout a aircraft or the Creatives labs Graphics chipset with the similar name?

    in reply to: FC-1 thread (news and pictures) #2659331
    matt
    Participant

    Arjun is an Aircraft? ooooh that long pipe must be where the rockety pow wowy stuff comes out to make it fly..

    i didnt know the Mig-31 was such a beautiful looking aircraft.

    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by PAF Fan
    Sabreace
    Talk is cheap, lets not pretend Pakistan will be a walk over, after the attack on the Indian parliament India mobilised its army and warned Pakistan that they were coming…………..then they walked back to their barracks! Again, congratulations on trying the change the subject, can we now go back to helicopter talk or do you want to insult each others armies a bit more!? I could post tons of links pointing to the poor state of Indias armed forces, but that has led to too many pointless arguments in the past….

    The Indian armour consists MAINLY of T-72s and Vijyantas, this is easy meat for AH-1Fs…….

    The report of the extra Cobra deliveries is on the FAS site, will post the link, we will have 60 Cobras not

    As seahwak pointed out, Cobras will use trees and hills to pop off their TOW rounds before quickly hiding behind cover, much of the dangerous spotting will be done by the Bell 206s

    last time i checked is was 20 cobras and 40 UH1’s

    matt
    Participant

    2S6M Tunguska Anti-Aircraft Artillery
    In addition to the 8 mounted ready missiles two additional missiles can be carried inside. Range out to 10 km for hovering aircraft and low flying targets. There is a 2S6M1 variant/upgrade, which has improved missile control, range and altitude capabilities of 1.5-10 km, and 0.015-6 km respectively. An artist`s concept of the Soviet ZSU-X anti-aircraft system was released by the US Department of Defense in January 1987. However, as of November 1997 the 2S6M1 was not known to be fielded.

    Specifications
    Alternative Designations 2K22M, Tunguska-M
    Date of Introduction 1990
    Proliferation At least 2 countries
    Description
    Crew 4
    Combat Weight (mt) 34
    Chassis GM-352M tracked vehicle
    Chassis Length Overall (m) 7.93
    Height (m)
    TAR up 4.02
    TAR down 3.36
    Width Overall (m) 3.24
    Automotive Performance
    Engine Type V-12 turbo diesel
    Cruising Range (km) 500
    Speed (km/h)
    Max. Road 65
    Max. Swim INA
    Fording Depths (m) INA
    Radio R-173
    Protection
    NBC Protection System Yes
    ARMAMENT
    Gun
    Caliber, Type, Name 30-mm gun, 2A38M
    Rate of Fire (rd/min) 4,800 (four gun total)
    Reload Time (min) gun ammunition and missiles in about 16 min.
    Elevation (°) (-/+) -10 to + 87°
    Fire on Move Yes
    Missile 9M311
    Name SA-19/GRISON
    Range (m)
    Max. Range 8,000-10,000
    Min. Range 2,500
    Altitude (m)
    Max. Altitude 3,500
    Min. Altitude 15
    Dimensions
    Length (m) 2.83
    Weight (kg) 57 (in container)
    Missile Speed (m/s) 600-900
    Guidance SACLOS
    Seeker Field of View(°) INA
    Tracking Rate INA
    Warhead Type Frag-HE
    Warhead Weight (kg) 9
    Fuze Type Proximity
    Self-Destruct (sec) INA
    System Reaction Time (sec) 6-12
    Fire on Move No (must be at a halt to fire the missile)
    FIRE CONTROL
    Sights w/magnification
    Stabilized optical sight 1A29M
    Magnification 8x
    Field of View(°) 8 o
    Commander’s position IR day/night sight
    IFF Yes
    Radars HOT SHOT radar system
    Name 1RL144 (TAR)
    Function Target Acquisition
    Detection Range (km) 18-20
    Tracking Range (km) INA
    Frequency 2-3 GHz
    Frequency Band E
    Name 1RL144M (TTR)
    Function Target Tracking
    Detection Range (km) 16
    Tracking Range (km) INA
    Frequency 10-20 GHz
    Frequency Band J
    MAIN ARMAMENT AMMUNITION
    Type AP-T, Frag-T, HE-I
    Range (m)
    Max. Range 4,000
    Min. Range 200
    Altitude (m)
    Max. Altitude 3,000
    Min. Altitude 0
    Projectile Weight (kg) INA

    in reply to: Five Mi-24PNs to be delivered 28 Jan #2659854
    matt
    Participant

    a pic of the Mi-24/35 ( hmm sorry i couldnt find decent enough pics so i dont know if this is the 35 or the 24, but i think it is the Mi-24)

    in reply to: Pakistan: Plane carrying 4 helicopters arrives from RUSSIA! #2659864
    matt
    Participant

    All this is Assuming that Air superiority is in favour of the AH1’s and that they are free to move around without any threat from Migs.

    in reply to: Bush Fears that China will Win Space Race. #2660449
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by SD-10
    How China has lost? Does US has Weopons in Space. Do they occupy Moon. Does US has monoply over who will send Satellites.There Space Shuttle Program is dead. They will have to borrow money from China Central Bank to build another Space Craft. The real race have not even begun yet.

    you want to send weapons in space? hmm have fun 🙂 …It Nearly made the US bankrupt, and please do spend millions on putting weopons up into space,while the rest of the world works on missiles fired from F-15’s and Mig-31’s that can knock them down!

    How is the space shutting program dead

    http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/home/index.html

    i guess (http://www.users.waitrose.com/~spaceplanes/htm/sp_x33.htm )
    means nothing to you!

    in reply to: Bush Fears that China will Win Space Race. #2660457
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by SD-10
    China is in Space Race. It cannot waste time on re-inventing the wheel every thing. All other Nations will do the Basic research. China will do advance research on their Products.

    They have already lost then.

    in reply to: Oh oh- Russian AF in Uncontrollable Decline #2660472
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by Dubya
    Simple economics.

    No war in Chechnya means that there is no demand for large amounts of funds and resources to be funnelled into that particular hellhole of a country.

    These funds and resources can be invested either back into the economy (smart use of funding) or be invested into Russian Naval Aviation (rather stupid use of funds but it means us aviation freaks can still talk about the capabilities of the navalized Su-33 Flanker).

    So why have any armies anyway? I mean just let everyone do what they want sit back and think bout all that money you saved up!

    Armies are not their to be show cases they are their to be used when needed. Not just sit around with alll the modern equipment in the world so that you can show the world how shiny your bigger stick is..

    in reply to: Oh oh- Russian AF in Uncontrollable Decline #2661579
    matt
    Participant

    so i phrased my post wrong. althought i dont deny that it has turned in the eyes of radicals as a Islam Vs Russia and the west and the world .. type situation, I was trying to say that it was not always like that.

    and i was just trying to make a side not the there were reports of Afghanis in chechniya .. sorry for the confusion. ..

    in reply to: Oh oh- Russian AF in Uncontrollable Decline #2661586
    matt
    Participant

    I do not think it is a simple case of Islamist against Russians although it has been turned into such a war. There were reports some time back of Afghans etc etc fighting for the chechans. but i dont have the source.

    any one who has more information could you please educate us. thanks.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,881 through 2,895 (of 3,292 total)